Hi All,
Question:
What (how, where) I need to set (configure) to make 'middle' button on
the touch pad acting as a '__paste__' button when I run LINUX (CentOS
6.2) as guest on MS Windows 7 Home premium ?
Details:
LENOVO T520 laptop
touch pad with 3 buttons
pointing device (red small mushroom)
On 09/01/12 15:43, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>
>>
>> http://taiter.com/techlog/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
>>
>
> My mistake, the correct link is here:
>
> http://blog.taiter.com/tech/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
>
> Forgot I was testing my redesign and had the wrong server in my h
On 01/09/2012 09:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On 2012-01-10 14:13, email builder wrote:
> ...
>
> ...
>> If I already have a bunch of packages from RepoForge, some of which
>> might also be in the CentOS repo (some presumably with lower version
>> numbers), what happens after installing and configuring
On 2012-01-10 08:44, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
..
>
> And then there's google+. I'm *REALLY* tired of Poredsky (or however
> his
> name's spelled), sending me spam in Russian
>
I hear you. I recently created an SPF record and added the necessary
SMF-SPF milter on my mail server just to fi
On Monday 09 January 2012 15:29:59 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> file_t means the file has no label, so the only way to create this
> type of file would be to remove the security attributes on the file.
> On an SELinux system, file_t should never be created, they are only
> created on a disabled SELinux
On 2012-01-10 14:13, email builder wrote:
...
...
> If I already have a bunch of packages from RepoForge, some of which
> might also be in the CentOS repo (some presumably with lower version
> numbers), what happens after installing and configuring
> yum-priorities?
>
> Do those packages automat
After solving my problem by downgrading perl-NetAddr-IP to the CentOS
repo's version, yum is of course telling me perl-NetAddr-IP is out of date
and needs to be updated (back to the buggy one in RepoForge).
So looks like yum-priorities is in order (ha! the pun!), but I have a question
>> Hmm, OK
>> I have three e-mail servers and the error is on all three.
>>
>> [root@MailIn ~]# service spamassassin restart
>> Stopping spamd: [ OK ]
>> Starting spamd: Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Export
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> I have three e-mail servers and the error is on all three.
>
> [root@MailIn ~]# service spamassassin restart
> Stopping spamd:[ OK ]
> Starting spamd: Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
> /usr/lib/per
On 01/09/2012 05:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> If it is your server you could just route the udp packets (using
> iptables to NAT if needed), unless you need access control or logging
> from the socks service.
The exit point is a few hops away, it's different from the default exit
point, and I d
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 04:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
>>> OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
>>
>> it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
>> decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't use
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> I have three e-mail servers and the error is on all three.
>
> [root@MailIn ~]# service spamassassin restart
> Stopping spamd:[ OK ]
> Starting spamd: Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
> /usr/lib/per
On 01/09/2012 04:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
>> OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
>
> it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
> decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
openssl is used for encryption, bu
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
>> OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
>
> it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
> decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
>
OpenVPN can run over ei
\
>> Is there somewhere at RepoForge I could notify them about this?
>
> users mailing list:
> us...@lists.repoforge.org
> http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thank you. I am reporting it now
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
h
On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
> OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca
On 01/09/2012 02:24 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> Anyone here using a SOCKS server? I'm using ss5 but there seems to be a
>> strange disconnect issue with it and openvpn. While I'm trying to figure
>> out whether ss5 is at fault, or openvpn, I'd like to try a different
>> SOCKS server. Could you rec
On 01/09/12 2:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I've argued before that blocks should be by source - actual source, the
> oldest "Received-From", not from the last mailer.
Those are far too easily forged, and in fact a majority of spam has
forged Recieved headers, you can only trust the one YOUR m
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
>> I am *NOT* going to jump hosting providers
>> every time this happens.
>
> fine, you've made your choice - you should spare us the grief of your own
> choices.
>
It's pretty hard to beat a free gmail account for mail lists and
similar
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I am *NOT* going to jump hosting providers
> every time this happens.
fine, you've made your choice - you should spare us the grief of your own
choices.
--
Craig White ~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com
1.
Craig White wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question
>> with my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
>> "image# 1" is looking for.
>>
>> This bloody email has now been blocke
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question with
> my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
> "image# 1" is looking for.
>
> This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
quite simpl
>> Is there somewhere at RepoForge I could notify them about this?
>
> users mailing list:
> us...@lists.repoforge.org
> http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thank you. I am reporting it now
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
> Anyone here using a SOCKS server? I'm using ss5 but there seems to be a
> strange disconnect issue with it and openvpn. While I'm trying to figure
> out whether ss5 is at fault, or openvpn, I'd like to try a different
> SOCKS server. Could you recommend one that works well on CentOS?
If you c
Anyone here using a SOCKS server? I'm using ss5 but there seems to be a
strange disconnect issue with it and openvpn. While I'm trying to figure
out whether ss5 is at fault, or openvpn, I'd like to try a different
SOCKS server. Could you recommend one that works well on CentOS?
Thanks.
--
Flo
I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question with
my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
"image# 1" is looking for.
This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 10:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 1:39 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > *giggle* *giggle* *laugh* *guffaw* BWAAHAHAHAHHH!
> >
> > No spam via gmail? Wow... Funniest thing I've heard all day!
>
> none of it that I've seen came through gmail servers...
On 01/09/2012 10:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> On 01/09/2012 10:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> Who here is *not* using a work email? Who here posts from their own
>>> hosting site? Has this ever happened to you?
>>
>> I own my own domain/server/subnet. My WIS
On 01/09/12 1:39 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> *giggle* *giggle* *laugh* *guffaw* BWAAHAHAHAHHH!
>
> No spam via gmail? Wow... Funniest thing I've heard all day!
none of it that I've seen came through gmail servers... lots of spam
from anonymous open relays with forged @gmail.com from addr
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:29:24PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Thats a BS excuse. gmail has MILLIONS more users than bluehost, yet
>> doesn't seem to ever be used to relay spam. Why? they are proactive
>
> *giggle* *giggle* *laugh* *guffaw* BWAAHAHAHAHHH!
>
> No spam
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 10:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Who here is *not* using a work email? Who here posts from their own
>> hosting site? Has this ever happened to you?
>
> I own my own domain/server/subnet. My WISP customers can only send mail
> via my server, with all
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 1:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Let's go through this again - we did it months ago. My site is hosted by
>> hostmonster, which also operates as bluehost. They are a*large*
>> provider,
>> with hundreds of thousands of domains, and the email from all of them go
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:29:24PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> Thats a BS excuse. gmail has MILLIONS more users than bluehost, yet
> doesn't seem to ever be used to relay spam. Why? they are proactive
*giggle* *giggle* *laugh* *guffaw* BWAAHAHAHAHHH!
No spam via gmail? Wow... Funniest t
On 01/09/12 1:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I own my own domain/server/subnet. My WISP customers can only send mail
> via my server, with all the prevention's I could think of. I have never
> been hit with this (but I do have small customer base), but I have had
> regular domains (like one lo
On 01/09/2012 10:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 01/09/12 12:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Again, I*HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
>>>more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
>>
>> your email is being relayed th
On 01/09/12 1:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Let's go through this again - we did it months ago. My site is hosted by
> hostmonster, which also operates as bluehost. They are a*large* provider,
> with hundreds of thousands of domains, and the email from all of them go
> through their (few) email
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 12:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Again, I*HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
>> more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
>
> your email is being relayed through 66.147.249.253
> (oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com) which
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 07:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST.
>> Do I hav
On 01/09/12 12:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Again, I*HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
> more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
your email is being relayed through 66.147.249.253
(oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com) which appears on several spam lists
On 01/09/2012 09:56 PM, email builder wrote:
> Is there somewhere at RepoForge I could notify them about this?
users mailing list:
us...@lists.repoforge.org
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
Google is the M
On 01/09/2012 07:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> On 01/09/2012 07:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe
>>> if I add a few more words
>>>
>>> John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 1
>> So maybe I *do* need to open a bug report? Where do I do
>> that?
>
> can you try to disable ipv6, then reboot and see if you still
> get the
> error message?
Sorry, it's a production machine, I'd rather not do that.
I can
make small
Again, I *HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>> > On 01/09/12 11:11 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> They are?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2012 03:24 PM, Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2012 20:00:29 Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>> SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon
>>> will not change t
On 01/09/12 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> > On 01/09/12 11:11 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> >> They are? I dunno - ours are labelled where they're intended to be
>>> >> mounted, like / or /boot
>> >
>> > don't plug one of those into a different system for repair
On Monday 09 January 2012 20:00:29 Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon
> > will not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the
> > content from /tmp and allow new content to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2012 03:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon
>> will not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the
>> content f
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 11:11 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> They are? I dunno - ours are labelled where they're intended to be
>> mounted, like / or /boot
>
> don't plug one of those into a different system for repair or you'll
> have all kinda grief. $HOSTNAME_root would be the sane
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> labels get messy too, when you have 27 systems and a half dozen file
>>> systems each. you want your labels globally unique so if you plug a
>>> volume into another system for repair there's no collisions. our
>>
>> They are?
On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon will
> not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the content
> from /tmp and allow new content to be created. If you want the
> content to be accessible from apac
On 01/09/12 11:11 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> They are? I dunno - ours are labelled where they're intended to be
> mounted, like / or /boot
don't plug one of those into a different system for repair or you'll
have all kinda grief. $HOSTNAME_root would be the sane way to do it...
>> hostnames
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, wrote:
>
>> labels get messy too, when you have 27 systems and a half dozen file
>> systems each. you want your labels globally unique so if you plug a
>> volume into another system for repair there's no collisions. our
>
> They are? I dunno - ours are labelled
On Jan 8, 2012, at 3:32 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
>> With all of the discussions regarding getting p3wned, I am feeling
>> paranoid and can't seem to figure out how to suppress this...
>>
>> telnet $SOME_CENTOS_5_SERVER 22
>> Trying $SOME_IP_ADDRESS...
>> Connected to $SOME_CENTOS_5_SERVER.
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 10:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> So we use labels. I*loathe* UUIDs. Quick, tell my yours on one system
>> without looking (as would be the case if the drive crashed).
>
> from my rescue environment, I'd use: xfs_admin -u /dev/
> (or the somewhat messier
On 01/09/12 10:37 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> If*anyone* has the answer to this, I want to know. Or maybe we should
> just file a bug against parted, which ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY does*not*
> want to a) align it for best performance, or b)*TELL* you what you need
> to align it.
Is there another
On 01/09/12 10:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So we use labels. I*loathe* UUIDs. Quick, tell my yours on one system
> without looking (as would be the case if the drive crashed).
from my rescue environment, I'd use: xfs_admin -u /dev/
(or the somewhat messier ext? equiv)
labels get messy
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 07:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe
>> if I add a few more words
>>
>> John R. Dennison wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I haven't
On 01/09/2012 07:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe if
> I add a few more words
>
> John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I haven't gotten anything from the list since
John R Pierce wrote:
> I have a large raid (lsi megaraid sas2 9261-8i card) and when I use
> parted to initialize it as the one big partition I want, it gives me a
> warning.
> # parted -a optimal /dev/sda "mkpart primary 128s -1s"
> Warning: You requested a partition from 65.5kB to 81.0
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/09/12 6:09 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> Works fine here...
>> On some PCs/servers the key is sdb...
>
> the days of relying on /dev/sd? are long past.
Heh. See the point of a related thread, where mkswap -L did. not. work. No
label...
>
> 'scsi' devices renumber themselves o
I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe if
I add a few more words
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do
I have a problem, or is the li
I have a large raid (lsi megaraid sas2 9261-8i card) and when I use
parted to initialize it as the one big partition I want, it gives me a
warning.
# parted /dev/sda "mklabel gpt"
Warning: The existing disk label on /dev/sda will be destroyed and
all data on this
disk will be
On 01/09/12 6:09 AM, John Doe wrote:
> Works fine here...
> On some PCs/servers the key is sdb...
the days of relying on /dev/sd? are long past.
'scsi' devices renumber themselves on every boot. case in point,
server I'm configuring now... has a LSI mptsas card with 2 disks
mirrored for the
On 01/09/2012 09:08 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> man sesearch
>
> sesearch -A -s httpd_t -C
>
> WIll show you all the allow rules for the apache service.
Thanks, Dan. I appreciate the clarification.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
>
> That sounds good.
> Would you share the munin plugin later pls?
> I'm interested too.
>
Sure will. This is not a top priority for me so I won't likely get to it
for another week or two, but once it is done I will share.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- M
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do I
> have a problem, or is the list quiet?
>
> Please cc me offlist, if this goes through.
I hope you get 20,000 replies :)
In the headers of all list traffi
I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do I
have a problem, or is the list quiet?
Please cc me offlist, if this goes through.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2012 09:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 01:36 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux says: "Access is only
>> allowed between similar types, so Apache running as httpd_t can
>> read /var/www/html/inde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon will
not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the content
from /tmp and allow new content to be created. If you want the
content to be accessible from apache, you could chan
>
> http://taiter.com/techlog/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
>
My mistake, the correct link is here:
http://blog.taiter.com/tech/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
Forgot I was testing my redesign and had the wrong server in my host
file :)
___
> Under gnome control panel, all seems ok: under sound preferences, sound
> output is configured to use HDMI channel.
>
> I am using nvidia drivers from elrepo.org (nvidia-x11-drv-290.10
> and kmod-nvidia-290.10). Somebody knows where can I find some doc to
> resolve this? Any idea?
I recall doi
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
>> From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
>>
>>> I tried to boot from my 6.0 USB key, no joy. Updated it to 6.2. Still
>>> no
>>> joy: it gets started, I do the disk layout, it formats the drives, and
>>> then fails, saying that it can't find "image# 1".
>>
>> Works fin
John Doe wrote:
> From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
>
>> I tried to boot from my 6.0 USB key, no joy. Updated it to 6.2. Still no
>> joy: it gets started, I do the disk layout, it formats the drives, and
>> then fails, saying that it can't find "image# 1".
>
> Works fine here...
> On some PCs/servers the k
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
> I tried to boot from my 6.0 USB key, no joy. Updated it to 6.2. Still no
> joy: it gets started, I do the disk layout, it formats the drives, and
> then fails, saying that it can't find "image# 1".
Works fine here...
On some PCs/servers the key is sdb...
syslinux.cfg:
On Monday 09 January 2012 12:06:04 Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 1/9/2012 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
> > First I'm no SELinux expert ;-( but I've ben following this
> > thread with interest. It apears to be going around in circles.
> >
> > The only time I've come across a file_t type is when I hav
On 1/9/2012 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2012 23:19:39 Bennett Haselton wrote:
>> On 1/8/2012 7:28 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> On 01/08/2012 03:15 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
It's a file created by one of my CGI scripts. (The web server
is accessed by several
On Sunday 08 January 2012 23:19:39 Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 1/8/2012 7:28 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > On 01/08/2012 03:15 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> >> It's a file created by one of my CGI scripts. (The web server
> >> is accessed by several hostnames which are dynamically assigned
>
On 01/08/2012 08:40 PM, email builder wrote:
>
> So maybe I *do* need to open a bug report? Where do I do that?
can you try to disable ipv6, then reboot and see if you still get the
error message?
>>> Sorry, it's a production machine, I'd rather not do that. I can
>>> make sm
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/07/2012 12:50 PM, email builder wrote:
> I don't know what is causing your specific issue ... whether you
> are
> getting something newer in sa-update than is designed to work with
> CentOS (sa-update bypasses the normal rpm type updates and does u
79 matches
Mail list logo
