On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/21/2012 05:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I have moved raid sets to other machines (of similar distribution
>> revs) and never had a problem before.
>
> I wouldn't expect you to. If you move volumes other than the boot
> volume, it doe
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 03:20:00PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 01:30 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > and somewhere in the last few days (in this list I think) someone posted
> > that Anaconda should detect the existing raid array and allow you to re-
> > use it for a new install.
> >
> >
On 01/21/2012 05:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I have moved raid sets to other machines (of similar distribution
> revs) and never had a problem before.
I wouldn't expect you to. If you move volumes other than the boot
volume, it doesn't matter that they get a new device name.
> In fact I have f
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 01:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I tried to boot a 5.x system with several raid1 sets with a 6.0 live
>> dvd and not only did it not detect/match up the mirrors, it renamed
>> and broke them so they no longer worked on 5.x. I
On 01/19/2012 01:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I tried to boot a 5.x system with several raid1 sets with a 6.0 live
> dvd and not only did it not detect/match up the mirrors, it renamed
> and broke them so they no longer worked on 5.x. I think there are
> major differences in the way the kernel han
On 01/19/2012 01:30 PM, fred smith wrote:
> and somewhere in the last few days (in this list I think) someone posted
> that Anaconda should detect the existing raid array and allow you to re-
> use it for a new install.
>
> so just as an experiment, I booted up the 6.2 DVD (not live) and took it
>
Greetings,
I installed a squid 3.1.10.i686 squid to a centos 6.2i686. The proxy is
working fine with the default config.
After I decided to use it as a transparent proxy, I added two lines to
config: http_proxy 10.0.5.1:3128 transparent, always_direct allow all
http_port 10.0.5.1:3128 transpare
Thank you. I will ignore the error message.
Helmut
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] Im Auftrag
von John Doe
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Januar 2012 18:03
An: CentOS mailing list
Betreff: Re: [CentOS] secpwgen
From: Helmut Drodofsky
8 matches
Mail list logo