On 03/06/12 10:40 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> I've had to use inode64 on far smaller file systems (15TB) due to inode
> counts (many files) and not file system size.
My understanding of it is, the inode number is its physical position on
the disk. if the first 1TB (2^31 * 512) of the disk h
- Original Message -
| On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:59 PM, John R Pierce
| wrote:
|
| > On 03/06/12 3:51 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
| >> Is there a need for inode64? Is it too late to back-out of it, or
| >> have you pickled the file system already.
| >
| > as i undertsand it, you need inode64 on an
On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/06/12 3:51 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
>> Is there a need for inode64? Is it too late to back-out of it, or have you
>> pickled the file system already.
>
> as i undertsand it, you need inode64 on any XFS file system over 2TiB,
> and ours is
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:43 +1100, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> Sadly still getting the same errors. Will have another go at this
> tomorrow. Three more things to try
> 1. UBCD and Western Digital diagnostics.
> 2. Bring the RAID array up via the live cd and see if it resyncs. At
> least I'll be able
On 03/06/12 3:51 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> Is there a need for inode64? Is it too late to back-out of it, or have you
> pickled the file system already.
as i undertsand it, you need inode64 on any XFS file system over 2TiB,
and ours is 74TiB.
--
john r pierceN 37
On Mar 6, 2012, at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/02/12 10:05 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> is anyone familiar with this inode64 stuff and NFS in EL6.2 ?
>
> still having show stopping issues with XFS, inode64, and NFS. the
> fsid=uuid option suggested by some googling doesn't seem to wo
Les Mikesell wrote:
>> But the permissions in lower folders, where I can create sub-folders,
>> are exactly the same as the permissions in the top folders, where I
>> cannot.
> Is SELinux active, and if so is the context set correctly?
Thanks for the response.
No, SELinux is not running:
Am 06.03.2012 18:56, schrieb Bowie Bailey:
> On 3/4/2012 10:25 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> hello list,
>>
>> I am attempting to backup a centos 5.4 (x86_64) server running mysql
>> with a cron job. Here's how the cron job looks:
>>
>> [root@cloud:/home/bluethundr/backupdb] #crontab -l
>> * 3 * * * /
On 03/02/12 10:05 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> is anyone familiar with this inode64 stuff and NFS in EL6.2 ?
still having show stopping issues with XFS, inode64, and NFS. the
fsid=uuid option suggested by some googling doesn't seem to work at all
for Solaris clients...
http://xfs.org/index.php/X
I'm having a strange problem with selinux and the mounting of a nfs
directory.
I'm specifying the security context as part of the mount command, yet the
security context still shows nfs.
The mount shows what the security context should be:
[root@clienthost ~]# mount
serverhost:/usr/local on /usr/
Hello,
I've some difficulties with my installation, specially with sieveshell.
O.K., just have a look on my site:
intranet : 10.0.10.0/24
DMZ : 10.0.0.0/24
My IMAP-server is based on DMZ-site on my host vml70 (10.0.0.70):
# netstat -penlut
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Pro
On 3/4/2012 10:25 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> hello list,
>
> I am attempting to backup a centos 5.4 (x86_64) server running mysql
> with a cron job. Here's how the cron job looks:
>
> [root@cloud:/home/bluethundr/backupdb] #crontab -l
> * 3 * * * /usr/bin/mysqldump jfwiki >
> /home/bluethundr/backup
Hello there,
since kernel update 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6, one of my USB external SATA
drives is not mounting. With kernel 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6, it auto-mounts
in GNOME desktop when I plug the disk.
When I plug the disk, this wakes it up and I see in /var/log/messages:
kernel: usb 2-4.2: USB disconnec
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
> Thanks again for responding.
> But the permissions in lower folders, where I can create sub-folders,
> are exactly the same as the permissions in the top folders, where I cannot.
>
>> And yes I have created new folders with mkdir.
Is SELi
On 03/06/2012 04:09 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Nataraj wrote:
>
I would check the ownership and permissions of the mail directories and
files. You might also try a different mail client.
>>> All the dovecot mail directories and files are in ~/Maildir ,
>>> and are owned by me, with all
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, William Warren
wrote:
> why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition?
It has to load code before you have the kernel that understands raid
or how to detect it. That's why they call it booting.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
On 2.3.2012 22:18, Digimer wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 04:00 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
>> On 3/2/2012 2:46 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>> On 3/2/2012 1:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Digimer wrote:
>> Bowie, in terms of RAID 10, each drive technically cant be standalone
>> right? The drives are st
On 6.3.2012 16:29, William Warren wrote:
> why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition?
Because grub cant read a mdraid 10
Make a /boot on mdraid 1 and the rest on mdraid 10
--
Kind Regards, Markus Falb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
As I understand anaconda uses parted to partition (starting from
centos 6), using this as example (kickstart configuration file):
clearpart --all --drives=sda --initlabel
part /boot --asprimary --size=200 --fstype=ext2 --ondisk=sda
part swap --asprimary --size=16384 --fstype=swap --ondisk=sda
part
Nataraj wrote:
>>> I would check the ownership and permissions of the mail directories and
>>> files. You might also try a different mail client.
>> All the dovecot mail directories and files are in ~/Maildir ,
>> and are owned by me, with all directories having 700 permission,
>> and all files
>
>
> Am 06.03.12 11:59, schrieb C. L. Martinez:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Somebody have tried to run a centos5 lxc guest under centos6 host??
>> Is it possible??
>>
>> Thanks.
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman
Am 06.03.12 11:59, schrieb C. L. Martinez:
> Hi all,
>
> Somebody have tried to run a centos5 lxc guest under centos6 host??
> Is it possible??
>
> Thanks.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent
Hi all,
Somebody have tried to run a centos5 lxc guest under centos6 host??
Is it possible??
Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Bob Hoffman
> Postfix, by default, accepts all incoming mail to any user listed in the
> shadow/passwd and alias files.
> I cannot find a way to stop that without manually blocking each non
> wanted user (like nobody, apache) without killing local delivery.
What about using /etc/postfix/
25 matches
Mail list logo
