Re: [CentOS] Newbie here

2012-04-07 Thread Eero Volotinen
2012/4/8 root : > Hello there > newbie here, > Finally managed to install 5.1 and hope to get started with RHCT > textbook.  Has anyone gone the self study route ?, any tips/hints to > light the way most appreciated. > Thanks for reading > Kind regards Hi, RHCT 5 or RHCE 5 is now obsolete. You sh

Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch? [solved]

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/7/2012 7:49 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Have you tried editing the files in >> >> /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/ >> >> or >> >> /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf >> >> ? > Obvisouly not:) And I hope not either... > Facilities are provided just for this in /etc/logwatc

Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/7/2012 9:37 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> I will take a look and try to see if it will be easy to change the >> postfix and dovecot. More than likely I will just tell them what it is >> and 'good luck' at figuring it out..lol > Only ignore what you encounter and deduce to be not important. >

[CentOS] Newbie here

2012-04-07 Thread root
Hello there newbie here, Finally managed to install 5.1 and hope to get started with RHCT textbook. Has anyone gone the self study route ?, any tips/hints to light the way most appreciated. Thanks for reading Kind regards Paul ___ CentOS mailing list C

Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I just assumed there was something newer out there. 2007 was the last >release notes for the version installed on centos. There is a newer >version out there, but that would be off of the base repo and not sure >if I want to go that route in the how-to. Dates aren't always a good judge of package

Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/7/2012 7:49 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Have you tried editing the files in >> >> /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/ >> >> or >> >> /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf >> >> ? > Obvisouly not:) And I hope not either... > Facilities are provided just for this in /etc/logwatc

[CentOS] Apparent Bug In Gnome Games

2012-04-07 Thread Mark LaPierre
Hey Y'all Can someone suggest the appropriate place to report a bug in a Gnome game? -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 www.counter.li.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos

Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Have you tried editing the files in > >/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/ > >or > >/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf > >? Obvisouly not:) And I hope not either... Facilities are provided just for this in /etc/logwatch. The location you refer to will get over written on an upda

Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Michael Davis
On 4/7/2012 3:55 PM, Mail Lists wrote: > On 04/07/2012 10:09 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: >> Logwatch file shows last upgrade to the code was 2007. >> The unmatched entries are killing me in the reports. >> I figure there must be a newer utility centos has in the repo but I >> cannot find one. >> >> Is l

Re: [CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???

2012-04-07 Thread David Hrbáč
Dne 7.4.2012 21:31, ken napsal(a): > "yum update" output: > > ... > --> Running transaction check > --> Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric > ---> Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > 1:

Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Mail Lists
On 04/07/2012 10:09 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: > Logwatch file shows last upgrade to the code was 2007. > The unmatched entries are killing me in the reports. > I figure there must be a newer utility centos has in the repo but I > cannot find one. > > Is logwatch the only one that is included? > > than

[CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???

2012-04-07 Thread ken
"yum update" output: ... --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric ---> Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 from installed has de

[CentOS] - tigervnc-server with kde

2012-04-07 Thread Paolo De Michele
Hi all I have a problem in the configuration of tigervnc-server-use centos 6.1 and tigervnc-server version is that which lies in the repo I followed the following steps: - tigervnc-installed - added the user in the section /etc/sysconfig/vncservers - set a password using the vncpassw

[CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
Logwatch file shows last upgrade to the code was 2007. The unmatched entries are killing me in the reports. I figure there must be a newer utility centos has in the repo but I cannot find one. Is logwatch the only one that is included? thanks ___ CentO

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS 6.2 *TO* a USB drive, not installing from USB.

2012-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/5/12, Lamar Owen wrote: > The grub order and names and the linux kernel/udev order and names should > not be assumed to have any correlation of any kind, since they are > discovered differently. Yes, that is what I understand from the grub manual. However, from that I also understand and exp