On 04/24/2012 03:08 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/23/12 5:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> The PVM/HVM distinction isn't really that relevant any more on modern
>> hardware and modern hypervisors since most of the overhead is eliminated
>> with hardware features (Nested Page Tables, etc.)
On 04/23/12 8:31 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> um, LVM can't see over 2TB of the drive either, unless its formatted
>> > GPT, whereupon it can't be used as a boot device on a non-EFI system.
> The idea is to create multiple 2TB partitions.
>
> In one specific case I set up a 4TB System by cr
On 04/24/2012 03:20 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/23/12 5:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>> Thanks! The controller I've got (I believe it is a 3Ware 9000 series) - I
>> think that controller does not allow you to create hardware slices on top
>> of a RAID'ed disk (volume). But that is a good idea i
On 04/23/12 5:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Thanks! The controller I've got (I believe it is a 3Ware 9000 series) - I
> think that controller does not allow you to create hardware slices on top
> of a RAID'ed disk (volume). But that is a good idea in general. I used that
> approach on a couple of H
On 04/23/12 5:12 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> The PVM/HVM distinction isn't really that relevant any more on modern
> hardware and modern hypervisors since most of the overhead is eliminated
> with hardware features (Nested Page Tables, etc.) and special guest drivers.
"special guest drivers
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
denni...@conversis.de> wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 11:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 04/23/12 2:34 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> >> OK, I just used Gparted Live (http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php ,
> >> a very useful distro, by the way)
On 04/23/2012 10:11 PM, aurfalien wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:54 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>>>
>>> I also prefer KVM over Xen, mainly I don;t have to do anything special when
>>> maintaining the env.
>>>
>>> But I haven't notic
On 04/23/2012 11:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/23/12 2:34 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>> OK, I just used Gparted Live (http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php ,
>> a very useful distro, by the way) to create a GPT partitioned disk. Then I
>> booted the netinstall for CentOS 6.2 - and it just
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>
>> So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
>>
>> My errors;
>>
>> /var/log/messages;
>>
>> kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 GPU installed in this system
On 23/04/12 21:00, aurfalien wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>>
>>> So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
>>>
>>> My errors;
>>>
>>> /var/log/messages;
>>>
>>> kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:14:19PM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Scott Robbins wrote on 04/22/2012 05:53 PM:
> > Do you really need it? I much prefer vpnc.
> >
> > http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/vpnc.html
> >
> > The Cisco client has always (in my less than humble opinion), been
> >
Please provide your smb.conf and krb5.conf files as well. BTW: the createupn
is not required on Win2K8R2 as this credential is passed now (according to MS)
- Original Message -
| Hi,
|
| I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it
| authenticate against our Windows
Can't speak with certainty about CentOS6 but assuming that it is using sssd
somewhat like Fedora you need to concentrate on /etc/sssd/sssd.conf and include
ldap_tls_reqcert = never
Note that sssd essentially takes the place of padl tools (/etc/ldap.conf)
Also note that /etc/openldap/ldap.conf
On 04/23/2012 03:44 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> |> pvs
> |Found duplicate PV 5ZTDCmWHDH6M04nl58Wyyi3nYG8BOCRo: using
> | /dev/mapper/mpathl not /dev/mapper/mpathi
> |PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
> |/dev/mapper/mpathk NetCluster0 lvm2 a--1.67t 1020.00m
>
Found the problem and solved.
I accidently copied the file /etc/openldap/ldap.conf accidently to under /root
account as .ldaprc file and immediately the problem goes away. Read manual
again and found that the tls_cert and tls_key are USER_ONLY option!
So now the problem goes away, and sure I'
On 04/23/12 2:34 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> OK, I just used Gparted Live (http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php ,
> a very useful distro, by the way) to create a GPT partitioned disk. Then I
> booted the netinstall for CentOS 6.2 - and it just fails to see the data on
> that disk! It wants to
ldapsearch -x -ZZ works fine on clients, when the server side slapd.conf has
'TLSVerifyClient' is set to 'try'. But after I changed that the 'demand' all
clients' "ldapsearch -x -ZZ" command fails immediately. I run the 'slapd -d3'
at server side too.
It looks like maybe 'ldapsearch -x -zz' d
Hi,
I'm trying to set up NFSv4 on two boxes (centos 5.5) and have it
authenticate against our Windows 2008R2 AD server acting as the KDC.
(samba/winbind is running ok with "idmap config MYCOMPANY: backend = rid"
so we have identical ids across the servers.)
I can mount my test directory fine vi
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, I just read a thread about it in this mailing list:
> On 04/18/2012 10:18 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > do I need to preboot into a shell or something and use parted before I
> > can install ?
> I use a bootable CD with gparted to create the GPT partition table and
> the partition
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:11 PM, aurfalien wrote:
> As for stock kernels, you mean HVMs right?
>
> I was speaking more about PVMs which is faster and more flexible then HVMs.
No, with pygrub you can run a stock kernel on a PVM domU:
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/PyGrub
> I never had any is
On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:54 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>>
>> I also prefer KVM over Xen, mainly I don;t have to do anything special when
>> maintaining the env.
>>
>> But I haven't notice an improvement over Xen.
>>
>> I really like th
On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:54 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>>
>> I also prefer KVM over Xen, mainly I don;t have to do anything special when
>> maintaining the env.
>>
>> But I haven't notice an improvement over Xen.
>>
>> I really like th
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:54 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>
> I also prefer KVM over Xen, mainly I don;t have to do anything special when
> maintaining the env.
>
> But I haven't notice an improvement over Xen.
>
> I really like the fact that the guest OS has a stock kernel, etc..
I do not quite s
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>
>> So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
>>
>> My errors;
>>
>> /var/log/messages;
>>
>> kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 GPU installed in this syste
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, aurfalien wrote:
> So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
>
> My errors;
>
> /var/log/messages;
>
> kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 GPU installed in this system is
> kernel: NVRM: supported through the NVIDIA 96.43.xx Leg
On Apr 23, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Peter Peltonen wrote:
>
>> I've been quite happy with Xen under CentOS5. For CentOS6 the
>> situation is a bit more problematic, as RH switched to KVM and left
>> Xen behind.
>
> I used Xen for about four or five years be
Hi all,
Having issues with the Nvidia drives on Centos 6.2.
So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
My errors;
/var/log/messages;
kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 GPU installed in this system is
kernel: NVRM: supported through the NVIDIA 96.43.xx Legacy
> There are now new external kernel modules for that:
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018587.html
>
>
> yum install kmod-bnx2
They are all installed.
# yum list installed kmod\*
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, kabi, refresh-packagekit, security
Loading suppor
On Monday, April 23, 2012 02:32:56 PM Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > Hmm, tigon III. I'm getting ready to look around, but anyone know of
> > issues with tg3 and the EL6 kernel as shipped in the LiveDVD?
>
> There are some known issues. For exampl
On Monday, April 23, 2012 02:39:10 PM Jason Pyeron wrote:
> We have been migrating a single RHEL3 box for several years. Shoot me now
> please.
I still have a 'not internet-connected' CentOS 2.1 server for one particular
application. Hrmph, I still have a Red Hat Linux 5.2 box in production for
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian La Roche
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 13:58
>
> > rsync vault.centos.org::centos-full-store/
>
>
> This is good news to get the data in a sane way for some
> special cases. (Yes, I can still see RHEL3 installations, so
We have been migrating a si
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> Additional information, from the F14 FSL i686 command line:
> +
> 09:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5906M Fast
> Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02)
> Kernel driver in use: tg3
> Kernel modules: tg3
> +
On Monday, April 23, 2012 01:48:59 PM Lamar Owen wrote:
...
> So, if anyone has had specific experience with a Dell Inspiron 1420n (came
> with Ubuntu pre-installed, incidentally) and CentOS 6 64-bit, I'd be
> interested in hearing it.
...
Additional information, from the F14 FSL i686 command li
Scott Robbins wrote on 04/22/2012 05:53 PM:
> Do you really need it? I much prefer vpnc.
>
> http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/vpnc.html
>
> The Cisco client has always (in my less than humble opinion), been
> pretty bad. I remember one wouldn't work on any smp, another wouldn't
> work
> rsync vault.centos.org::centos-full-store/
This is good news to get the data in a sane way for some special
cases. (Yes, I can still see RHEL3 installations, so RHEL4 is not
the only version that needs to migrate off.)
best regards,
Florian La Roche
__
On Monday, April 23, 2012 12:14:22 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Rsync is setup on all the vault mirrors ... there are more than 1.
> (There are currently 4 and one master ... these are in both the US and EU)
...
Thanks, Johnny. Nice to know the mirror police won't be after me. :-)
_
Good afternoon, CentOS list.
I am beginning triage of a rather wierd issue I experienced Saturday with
CentOS 6.2 LiveDVD, x86_64. I'm posting this information in hope that someone
may have seen something similar.
I use a USB key with CentOS 6.2 LiveDVD loaded, with an encrypted home
filesyst
On 04/23/2012 11:54 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
> I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files, including
> kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network interfaces.
>
> dmesg says:
>
> bnx2: Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.2.1 (Dec 18, 2011
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> I've been quite happy with Xen under CentOS5. For CentOS6 the
> situation is a bit more problematic, as RH switched to KVM and left
> Xen behind.
I used Xen for about four or five years before switching to KVM. I like
KVM better in every way, and for
I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files, including
kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network interfaces.
dmesg says:
bnx2: Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.2.1 (Dec 18, 2011)
alloc irq_desc for 36 on node -1
alloc kstat_ir
On 04/23/2012 10:32 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Monday, April 23, 2012 06:51:36 AM Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> They have been put there recently ... I am conflicted about making vault
>> easy to use.
> Johnny, speaking of vault, there is a minor issue I see with vault:
> +
> rsync rsync://va
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby
wrote:
> I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use
> case.
LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs /
tutorials for CentOS available?
I've been quite happy with Xen under CentOS5. Fo
On Monday, April 23, 2012 06:51:36 AM Johnny Hughes wrote:
> They have been put there recently ... I am conflicted about making vault
> easy to use.
Johnny, speaking of vault, there is a minor issue I see with vault:
+
rsync rsync://vault.centos.org/
msync.CentOS.org rsync service (ce
On 04/20/2012 04:23 PM, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
> On CentOS6 all is fine
> with KVM right out of the box.
>
> Never used XEN so cannot compare.
Same here.
I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use
case.
I think the OP should provide more details: What is benchmarke
On Monday, April 23, 2012 06:43:12 AM Karanbir Singh wrote:
> the drive ordering will not matter as long as the bios isnt mapping the
> usb disk as sda and/or trying to inject them into boot ordering
FWIW, and for the archives, we have a Dell Precision 690 that does exactly
that. I have a Seaga
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 13:06 +0200, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 23.4.2012 09:21, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> > How to get the USB external drives to be detected in always the same
> > order, so that they always get the same "name"? /dev/sdX fixed to them?
> > That way, the LVM wont be messed...
>
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:43 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 09:02 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> >> How to get the USB external drives to be detected in always the same
> >> order, so that they always get the same "name"? /dev/sdX fixed to them?
> >> That way, the LVM wont be messed...
>
On 04/23/2012 07:03 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Karanbir Singh
>> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 3:57
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 live cd?
>>
>> On 04/22/2012 08:54 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>> It seems that the live cd for 5 is no longer in existence.
>> Is t
On 04/23/2012 01:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Given it is unlikely anyone will (I have never made one before and my itch has
> been scratched with 5.6), how about leaving the 5.6 live cd in the isos
> directory with the present and future 5.x releases?
there is the issue of a rather long SA / BA /
> -Original Message-
> From: Karanbir Singh
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 3:57
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 live cd?
>
> On 04/22/2012 08:54 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > It seems that the live cd for 5 is no longer in existence.
> Is this an
> > oversight or by design?
> >
>
> at C
Le ven. 20 avril 2012 19:24:37 CEST, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit:
> On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> > I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official"
> > *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do
> > yum update openoffice, I have to unin
On 04/23/2012 01:43 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I suspect Mihamina is trying to fix a non-existant problem
I'm on the way to buy the external racks (I got the disks), I did not
really test... Sorry if inconvenient.
--
RMA.
___
CentOS mailing list
Cent
On 04/23/2012 09:02 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
>> How to get the USB external drives to be detected in always the same
>> order, so that they always get the same "name"? /dev/sdX fixed to them?
>> That way, the LVM wont be messed...
>
> Perhaps you can use UUIDs for that like Fedora is already doing
On 23.4.2012 09:21, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> How to get the USB external drives to be detected in always the same
> order, so that they always get the same "name"? /dev/sdX fixed to them?
> That way, the LVM wont be messed...
lvm cares about device names?
I always thought lvm works with
On 04/22/2012 08:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <4f9281cb.4050...@hrbac.cz>,
> David Hrbac wrote:
>> Dne 21.4.2012 10:27, Tony Mountifield napsal(a):
>>> Except don't change the gpgkey lines, as the keys are still in the
>>> original place and haven't moved to vault. (I discovered th
On 04/23/2012 09:21 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> How to get the USB external drives to be detected in always the same
> order, so that they always get the same "name"? /dev/sdX fixed to them?
> That way, the LVM wont be messed...
Perhaps you can use UUIDs for that like Fedora is already do
On 04/22/2012 08:54 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> It seems that the live cd for 5 is no longer in existence. Is this an
> oversight
> or by design?
>
at CentOS-5.8 release time, people thought that it wasent worth doing
the C5 livecd anymore since everyone was expected to be using centos-6
now for l
Hi all,
I have a box, until warranty (I may not open it) and 2 external USB hard
drives.
My perfect solution is to open the box, plug the drives on the SATA
slots, and use them.
Unfortunately, I'll have to fall back to the cheap solution: I would
like to use each external drive as physical vo
58 matches
Mail list logo
