On 25 April 2012 07:09, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Is there a way to nail down the issue of high load on a server basically
> trying to understand the reason behind high load at a specific time period.
> I use top command but it does not have history.
Among many other solutions, my favourite is nmon
Hi
Is there a way to nail down the issue of high load on a server basically
trying to understand the reason behind high load at a specific time period.
I use top command but it does not have history.
Nagios reports saying "*[04-25-2012 10:11:00] SERVICE ALERT:
dev;LOAD;WARNING;HARD;3;WARNING - lo
You're right. The stack was there.
First, I was inaccurate when I said I installed 6.2. I actually installed 6.0,
and later updated via yum.
Second, yeah I was able to start the network service, so there was a stack.
All I'd get would be the loopback or "lo" interface, but it was there.
Bu
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:40 -0400, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP
> secondary?
>
> Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility
> to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6.
>
> Hopin
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/24/12 2:24 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > Anyway, with 18TB of raid 6 might cause performance problems .. raid
> > 60 or raid 10 looks much better solution.
>
> 18TB of raid6 is only 8 3TB drives (6 + 2 parity) thats not an
> unrea
On 04/24/12 2:24 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Anyway, with 18TB of raid 6 might cause performance problems .. raid
> 60 or raid 10 looks much better solution.
18TB of raid6 is only 8 3TB drives (6 + 2 parity) thats not an
unreasonable size for a raid6 set.
for the 81TB nearline storage boxes
On 04/24/2012 08:53 PM, Al Sparks wrote:
> I recently did a minimal 6.2 install recently, and it was annoying that it
> didn't include the network stack.
>
> What use is an install w/o the network?
>
It has the network stack ... you must configure it during the install.
If you do not configure a
I recently did a minimal 6.2 install recently, and it was annoying that it
didn't include the network stack.
What use is an install w/o the network?
=== Al
From: Bob Hoffman
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Cen
On 4/24/2012 7:22 PM, listmail wrote:
> I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I
> tried doing the "minimal" installation available with the installer, but it's
> a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal
> starting place. I'm pretty
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:22:17 -0700, listmail wrote
> Also, any
> ideas as to what would be launching cups would be appreciated.
>
I answered one of my own questions: cups was being started by the VMware tools
startup script. I fixed this for now by editing the VMware startup script and
removing
Hi All,
I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I
tried doing the "minimal" installation available with the installer, but it's
a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal
starting place. I'm pretty familiar with 5.x, but what I'm find
Good afternoon/morning/evening everyone,
I've been running into
the problem of clients using Windows 7 with CentOS 5.X and file/printer
sharing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stand samba-3.0.33-x.x.x
packages DO NOT provide compatibility with Windows Vista/7. I've had to
manually compile s
On 04/24/2012 05:00 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable?
>
> - Original Message -
> |
> | CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical
> |
> | Upstream details at :
> | http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html
> |
> | The
On 2012-04-24, James A. Peltier wrote:
> Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable?
A CESA about samba3x was sent out on the same day, IIRC.
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:/
Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable?
- Original Message -
|
| CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical
|
| Upstream details at :
| http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html
|
| The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
| sync
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Ge,
>
> Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
> partition the drive for the installation.
Any way you'd like. CentOS can't BOOT from a GPT partitioned device if
the BIOS does not support it, but you can cer
2012/4/25 Eero Volotinen :
> 2012/4/25 Markku Kolkka :
>> 24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
>>> Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
>>> partition the drive for the installation.
>>
>> Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical vo
2012/4/25 Markku Kolkka :
> 24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
>> Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
>> partition the drive for the installation.
>
> Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume.
Is it really possible to bo
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Markku Kolkka
wrote:
> 24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
> > Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
> > partition the drive for the installation.
>
> Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volum
24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti:
> Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
> partition the drive for the installation.
Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume.
--
Markku Kolkka
markku.kol...@iki.fi
_
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2012/4/24 Boris Epstein :
> > Ge,
> >
> > Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
> > partition the drive for the installation.
> >
> > Boris.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers wrote:
> >
>
2012/4/24 Boris Epstein :
> Ge,
>
> Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
> partition the drive for the installation.
>
> Boris.
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers wrote:
>
>> Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot
>> fro
On 04/24/2012 02:10 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> Bizarrely enough, I ended up with what I intended to be called "eth1" being
> called "rename3". Would anybody have any idea what the cause could be of
> this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Boris.
This should help;
On CentOS 6.x:
https://al
Ge,
Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
partition the drive for the installation.
Boris.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers wrote:
> Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot
> from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to b
Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot
from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to boot of a USD device).
/boot usually only get access when you do kernel updates.
--
Gé
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
On 4/24/2012 1:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/24/12 4:46 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> I used the raid controller for this. On a regular disk you just create two
>> partitions I guess.
> which part of MBR not supporting disks over 2TB do you not understand?
> you have to use GPT to pu
Hi all,
Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP
secondary?
Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility
to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6.
Hoping I can mix and match but it looks like I may not be able to.
My LDAP
Hello listmates,
Bizarrely enough, I ended up with what I intended to be called "eth1" being
called "rename3". Would anybody have any idea what the cause could be of
this?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On 04/24/12 4:46 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> I used the raid controller for this. On a regular disk you just create two
> partitions I guess.
which part of MBR not supporting disks over 2TB do you not understand?
you have to use GPT to put a partition past 2^32 * 512 bytes == 2TiB
--
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 24/04/12 15:56, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
>> On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
>>> I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
>>> including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
>>> interfaces.
>>>
>>> d
Peter Kjellstr??m writes:
> On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
> > I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
> > including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
> > interfaces.
> >
> > dmesg says:
> > bnx2: Can't load firmware fi
HI
I have something in /var/log/audit/audit.log like:
avc: denied { write } for pid=23739 comm="httpd" name="renderd.sock"
dev=dm-0 ino=1183752 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file
use audit2allow it generates somethin
On 04/24/2012 11:58 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 06:44 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
>>> I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use
>>> case
>> LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs /
>> tutorials for CentOS available?
>
> You
On 04/24/2012 05:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/23/12 8:31 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> um, LVM can't see over 2TB of the drive either, unless its formatted
GPT, whereupon it can't be used as a boot device on a non-EFI system.
>> The idea is to create multiple 2TB partitions.
>>
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote:
> I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files,
> including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network
> interfaces.
>
> dmesg says:
> bnx2: Can't load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
This i
hte main problem is that when I use pvchange -u it refuses to make
operation to clsutered volume
Volume Groups with the clustered attribute will be inaccessible.
Found duplicate PV 46dU6F2rU9xqqOaWf8eihFwbdGp672lS: using
/dev/mapper/mpathh not /dev/mapper/mpathk
Found duplicate PV 5ZTDC
On 4/24/12 12:05 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 03:44 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
>> |> pvs
>> |Found duplicate PV 5ZTDCmWHDH6M04nl58Wyyi3nYG8BOCRo: using
>> | /dev/mapper/mpathl not /dev/mapper/mpathi
>> |PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
>> |/dev
On 04/23/2012 06:44 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
>> I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use
>> case
> LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs /
> tutorials for CentOS available?
You dont need rpms: the libvirt directly use the LXC API.
A tutorial:
39 matches
Mail list logo
