Hi,
Has anyone here tried the latest Qt version - 4.8.1 - on a CentOS 5
system? I've tried, and also failed - most programs will crash during
some very fundamental operation, like drawing windows or something. This
only happens when GUI Style is set to "Desktop Settings (Default)" (when
runnin
On 05/10/2012 12:36 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
> At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
> release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
> its 6.2 .
>
> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
> numbered sub releas
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
>>> locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
>>> locally. Is there any solution tha
The even number is merely selected as a reference point, nothing to do
with stable or unstable .
I'm aiming to create a controlled environment where there is less
that users can do to break their systems ...
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 08:55 AM
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on 05/10/2012 05:56 PM:
> I do not agree with "minor versions are only snapshots in time when
> install media is re-generated". I should have left only part of the
> sentence I disagree with.
What's not to agree with in that? It may be incomplete, but not incorrect.
W
On 05/11/2012 08:14 AM, Jon Detert wrote:
> Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x or
> 6.x) :
>
> 1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release? Typically,
> when you install you are getting a package set available from a specific
> minor
on 5/10/2012 9:47 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you are over-analyzing. The senders are distributed and shift
>>> around whether you do anything defensive or not, and if you have ever
>>> accepted an address, even years
On May 10, 2012, at 10:25 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/10/12 1:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> http://www.virtualmin.com/node/19608
>>> From that page: "The best fix for now would be to
>> stop using the chroot completely, as it has few real security benefits
>> in my opinion."
>
> from my page (n
On 10/05/12 20:55, Timothy Madden wrote:
>
> I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
> have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
> nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a
> name server and use all the others from
On May 10, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>
> What I got out of it is virtualmin is trying to play with chrooted files
> in the chrooted location instead of understanding
> that bind-chroot kinda dynamically or symbolically puts them there (or
> whatever it does).
> It should be changing
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
> I do not agree with "minor versions are only snapshots in time when
> install media is re-generated". I should have left only part of the
> sentence I disagree with.
They coincide with batches of less critical fixes so if you are
in
On 05/10/2012 11:48 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> I can not agree with this. Minor versions also introduce newer kernels
>> (hardware support) and some changes in packages that are not done during
>> regular update releases. Certain tec
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> I can not agree with this. Minor versions also introduce newer kernels
> (hardware support) and some changes in packages that are not done during
> regular update releases. Certain technological previews are also
> introduced and so o
On 05/10/12 2:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I can not agree with this. Minor versions also introduce newer kernels
> (hardware support) and some changes in packages that are not done during
> regular update releases. Certain technological previews are also
> introduced and so on.
Those 'newe
On 05/10/2012 10:35 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 5/10/2012 1:14 PM Jon Detert spake the following:
>> Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x
>> or 6.x) :
>>
>> 1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release?
>> Typically, when you install you
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:38, the following was written:
> I have two seemingly identical (in this reglard, at least) machine - both
> of them are running CentOS 6.2 with bind (bind-chroot) installed. I used
> webmin to edit the DNS configuration. One one of them it seems to work
> fine, on
on 5/10/2012 1:14 PM Jon Detert spake the following:
> Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x or
> 6.x) :
>
> 1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release? Typically,
> when you install you are getting a package set available from a specif
Two related questions about the minor release numbers (e.g. the 'x' in 5.x or
6.x) :
1) What constitutes the o.s. being at a particluar minor release? Typically,
when you install you are getting a package set available from a specific minor
release number. But what minor release is the o.s. a
>
> > What is the best way to upgrade to Python 2.6 from the default Python
> 2.4.
>
> > I've read these horror stories online and don't want to break yum.
>
> Hi. At least there are 2 ways that I have tried and work.
The first:
yum install gcc tcl tk sqlite-devel readline-devel gdbm-devel
yum ins
Is there a way of installing xulrunner-1.9 along side xulrunner-10.0? I
have an application that wants the older version of xulrunner and does
not seem to work with xulrunner-10.0.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / hel...@deepsoft.com
Deepwoods Software-- http://www.deepso
On 05/10/2012 06:48 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> In distant past I though of SELinux as burden. Now, I use it on every
>> system I install.
>>
>> Take a look at Virtualmin (GPL). I prefer it instead of ISPConfig, and
>> it has regular repo
On 5/10/2012 1:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/10/12 1:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> http://www.virtualmin.com/node/19608
>>> From that page: "The best fix for now would be to
>> stop using the chroot completely, as it has few real security benefits
>> in my opinion."
> from my page (not written)
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:25 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
> from my page (not written)
>
> "The best fix would be to toss webmin out the door, its a piece of junk
> that just messes up your system configuration"
>
> same goes for CPanel, Plesk, and the rest of that lot.
If webmin is a piece of ju
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
> Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as to how to rename the network cards,
> ie I have one that ended up being system-eth3, that I want to be
> system-eth1?
>
> I am setting up a new CentOS 6.2 system that I plan to use as a gateway
> and
On 05/10/12 1:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
> http://www.virtualmin.com/node/19608
> > From that page: "The best fix for now would be to
> stop using the chroot completely, as it has few real security benefits
> in my opinion."
from my page (not written)
"The best fix would be to toss webmin out the doo
Just went through this last night UUID is involved now this should help -
https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6
Tom,
Thank you very much. This should help me fix the problem.
Greg
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Meant to say UDEV...
Just went through this last night UUID is involved now this should help -
> https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>
>> Everyone,
>>
>> Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as to ho
Just went through this last night UUID is involved now this should help -
https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as to how to rename the network cards,
>
Everyone,
Can anyone refer me to a tutorial as to how to rename the network cards,
ie I have one that ended up being system-eth3, that I want to be
system-eth1?
I am setting up a new CentOS 6.2 system that I plan to use as a gateway
and e-mail server. The original machine had only one nic card,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> In distant past I though of SELinux as burden. Now, I use it on every
> system I install.
>
> Take a look at Virtualmin (GPL). I prefer it instead of ISPConfig, and
> it has regular repository you can install and update from.
>
Thanks,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
>>
>> I think you are over-analyzing. The senders are distributed and shift
>> around whether you do anything defensive or not, and if you have ever
>> accepted an address, even years ago with a system like qmail that
>> accepted without checki
On windows I use filemon, it tells me every file operation and its result. I
have search high and low, but cannot seem to find an alternative.
I tried the instructions from
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2415252#post2415252
...
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/block_dump
while true; do dmesg -c; s
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
on 5/9/2012 9:59 AM Les Mikesell spake the following:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>
>> I am starting to see a real pattern to all this.
>>
>> I would love to see someone do a case study on spam attacks. Their
>> system seems well honed to scale up with your defenses unti
On 05/10/2012 04:56 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I have been reading a tutorial on configuring and securing a CentOS 6.2
> machine:
> http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect-server-centos-6.2-x86_64-with-apache2-ispconfig-3-p3
>
> This tutorial bases the configuration on an application called
> ISPConfig. I
I have been reading a tutorial on configuring and securing a CentOS 6.2 machine:
http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect-server-centos-6.2-x86_64-with-apache2-ispconfig-3-p3
This tutorial bases the configuration on an application called
ISPConfig. I am not sure that I like the idea of disabling the stoc
On 05/10/2012 09:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
>>> locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
>>> locally. Is there any solution that simply lets yo
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
>> locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
>> locally. Is there any solution that simply lets you tell yum not to
>> install any updates new
On May 10, 2012, at 1:36, Gregory Machin wrote:
> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
> numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval. But
> will allow updates within a given release.
Others have debated the usefulness of this requirement, so I wo
On 05/10/2012 01:07 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 06:55 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
>> I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
>> have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
>> nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localh
On 5/10/2012 4:57 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Boris Epstein
>
>> I have two seemingly identical (in this reglard, at least) machine - both
>> of them are running CentOS 6.2 with bind (bind-chroot) installed. I used
>> webmin to edit the DNS configuration. One one of them it seems to work
>> fine, o
On 05/10/2012 07:52 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
>> repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
>>
> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
> local
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
> repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
>
All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
locally which seems like overkill when you aren't chang
On 05/10/2012 08:55 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/09/12 10:36 PM, Gregory Machin wrote:
>> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
>> numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval.
>
> thats a rather strange requirement. 6.1 is 6.0 with updates rol
On 05/10/2012 06:55 AM, Timothy Madden wrote:
> I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
> have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
> nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a
> name server and use all the others fr
I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I
have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of
nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a
name server and use all the others from the list provided by dhcp.
But it was too nice
On 05/10/2012 04:49 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012 03.58.17 Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>>> On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
>>
On Thursday 10 May 2012 03.58.17 Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >> At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
> >> release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum up
On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
>> Hi.
>> At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
>> release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
>> its 6.2 .
>>
>> I have a requirement wh
From: Boris Epstein
>I have two seemingly identical (in this reglard, at least) machine - both
>of them are running CentOS 6.2 with bind (bind-chroot) installed. I used
>webmin to edit the DNS configuration. One one of them it seems to work
>fine, on the other I get messages akin to the following
50 matches
Mail list logo
