On 05/13/2012 01:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 05:23 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>> >> knows where to get them. Isn't it overkill to keep a whole repo
snapshot copy when you really just need a way to tell yum the package
I've been hard hit by the lack of CentOS-6 documentation
mentioned in another thread.
The openLDAP setup has been changed completely between CentOS 5 and 6,
and I haven't been able to find any reasonably coherent instructions
explaining how to upgrade.
If anyone knows of such a document I should be
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> It is interesting in that the nic interface on the mother board is
> listed as :
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit
>
> The nic interface on the mother board works fine. Based on this I would
> have expec
I've been hard hit by the lack of CentOS-6 documentation
mentioned in another thread.
The openLDAP setup has been changed completely between CentOS 5 and 6,
and I haven't been able to find any reasonably coherent instructions
explaining how to upgrade.
If anyone knows of such a document I should be
On 05/12/2012 05:23 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> >> knows where to get them. Isn't it overkill to keep a whole repo
>>> snapshot copy when you really just need a way to tell yum the package
>>> versions you want on the 2nd box?
>> Why all the
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> knows where to get them. Isn't it overkill to keep a whole repo
>> snapshot copy when you really just need a way to tell yum the package
>> versions you want on the 2nd box?
>
> Why all the agida? This isn't difficult:
What is the point
On 5/12/12 4:33 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> 00:12:19,603 ERROR [luci.lib.ricci_helpers] Unable to retrieve the batch
>> number from virtsrv3n3
> Looks like that comes from:
> ./usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/luci/lib/ricci_helpers.py
>
> Whats unfortunate is their are several functions that e
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> It is interesting in that the nic interface on the mother board is
> listed as :
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit
>
> The nic interface on the mother board works fine. Based on this I would
> have expec
On 12 May 2012 09:35, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 07:50 AM, Nux! wrote:
> > On 12.05.2012 09:24, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> >> Hello List Mates,
> >>
> >> I don't know if here is the right place for this question if it's not
> >> I
> >> will appreciate it if you can point me to the right mail
On 05/12/2012 12:46 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> A late reply, but hopefully a useful set of feedback for the archives:
>
> On 04/20/2012 05:59 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>> Key factors from my opint of view are:
>> - stability (which one runs more smoothly on CentOS?)
>
> I found that xenconsoled c
On Sun, 6 May 2012, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
with "fork performance" I assume you're comparing Xen PV to KVM ?
Yes, PV has disadvantage (per design) for that workload, since the hypervisor
needs to check and verify each new process page table, and that has some
performance hit.
For good "fork per
On 12.05.2012 17:40, Robert Heller wrote:
> I have re-packaged xulrunner 1.9.2.26 for CentOS 5 for use with older
> applications which can't be run with xulrunner 10.0.4. I created
> 'compatibity' RPMs that can be safely installed alongside xulrunner
> 10.0.4. I needed it to run the Evergreen 2.1
On 05/12/2012 12:46 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> A late reply, but hopefully a useful set of feedback for the archives:
Well let me share my experience as well.
> On 04/20/2012 05:59 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote:
>> Key factors from my opint of view are:
>> - stability (which one runs more smoothly on Ce
Am 12.05.2012 18:59, schrieb Gregory P. Ennis:
> On 5/12/2012 11:39 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> OK, I do have lspci on this system; I am going to it down and put the
>> st1000spex back in the slot, and will send the lspci out put after I
>> reboot.
>>
>> Greg
> is the eth cable plugged in all t
On 5/12/2012 11:39 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> OK, I do have lspci on this system; I am going to it down and put the
> st1000spex back in the slot, and will send the lspci out put after I
> reboot.
>
> Greg
is the eth cable plugged in all the way?
___
I have re-packaged xulrunner 1.9.2.26 for CentOS 5 for use with older
applications which can't be run with xulrunner 10.0.4. I created
'compatibity' RPMs that can be safely installed alongside xulrunner
10.0.4. I needed it to run the Evergreen 2.1 and 2.2 Staff Clients at
our local library. The R
On 5/12/2012 11:39 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> OK, I do have lspci on this system; I am going to it down and put the
> st1000spex back in the slot, and will send the lspci out put after I
> reboot.
>
> Greg
is the eth cable plugged in all the way?
___
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> It is interesting in that the nic interface on the mother board is
> listed as :
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit
>
> The nic interface on the mother board works fine. Based on this I would
> have expec
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I am still having difficulty installing a second ethernet card in a new
> CentOS 6.2 install. Tom Bishop was kind enough to give me an excellent
> link to figure out how to change the device names the way I need to have
> t
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I am still having difficulty installing a second ethernet card in a new
> CentOS 6.2 install. Tom Bishop was kind enough to give me an excellent
> link to figure out how to change the device names the way I need to have
> t
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I am still having difficulty installing a second ethernet card in a new
> CentOS 6.2 install. Tom Bishop was kind enough to give me an excellent
> link to figure out how to change the device names the way I need to have
> t
Dear List,
I am still having difficulty installing a second ethernet card in a new
CentOS 6.2 install. Tom Bishop was kind enough to give me an excellent
link to figure out how to change the device names the way I need to have
them. It looks to me that CentOS is recognizing the st1000spex card
f
On 05/12/2012 07:50 AM, Nux! wrote:
> On 12.05.2012 09:24, Earl Ramirez wrote:
>> Hello List Mates,
>>
>> I don't know if here is the right place for this question if it's not
>> I
>> will appreciate it if you can point me to the right mailing list.
>>
>> I have successfully installed KVM on my x8
On 12.05.2012 09:24, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> Hello List Mates,
>
> I don't know if here is the right place for this question if it's not
> I
> will appreciate it if you can point me to the right mailing list.
>
> I have successfully installed KVM on my x86_64 laptop, however I am
> getting
> the fo
Am 12.05.2012 10:24, schrieb Earl Ramirez:
> Below are the processor that I am using, however I do not see any svm or
> vmx flags and there is no option to change anything in the BIOS for the
> processor. Does this mean I need to replace my current laptop to get KVM to
> work?
Yes, KVM requires v
Hello List Mates,
I don't know if here is the right place for this question if it's not I
will appreciate it if you can point me to the right mailing list.
I have successfully installed KVM on my x86_64 laptop, however I am getting
the following error when I try to connect "QEMU" from the Virtual
26 matches
Mail list logo
