Am Tue, 15 May 2012 21:11:00 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn:
> I'm looking for the ldirectord package but can't find it. Previously
> this was available as "heartbeat-ldirectord" and nowadays it is built as
> an independent package from "resource-agents" however neither seems to
> be availabl
On 16.5.2012 2.42, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Now I just have to fix the sendmail ("rx" instance) config so that it
> really sends the email to localhost (where amavis is listening), instead
> of trying to send directly to the final destination.
Ok, I found it, and it is *so* obvious. Still it took me h
On 16.5.2012 1.03, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> define(`ESMTP_MAILER_ARGS',`TCP $h 10024')dnl
> Right, here you modify the target port of that Sendmail instance. And I
> bet $1.000 that if you tcpdump on the main mail server you will see the
> sending attempt to come in there at port 10024 and thus
Am 15.05.2012 23:39, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
> Just in case, here is my conf for the rx instance. To repeat, this
> sendmail instance sends everything to amavisd at port 10024.
> - Jussi
Ah, here i
On 16.5.2012 0.37, Frank Cox wrote:
> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>
> One server here, one across town, or even two separate boxes in a single room
> -- sure. But in the same box? If the the box is on fire, now you're out both
> your main and your backup server.
>
> I must be
on 5/15/2012 2:39 PM Jussi Hirvi spake the following:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
> Just in case, here is my conf for the rx instance. To repeat, this
> sendmail instance sends everything to amavisd at port 10024.
> - Jussi
Am 15.05.2012 23:42, schrieb Larry Martell:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Frank Cox
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
>> Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
>>
>> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>>
Am 15.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Frank Cox:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
> Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
>> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
>
> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>
> One server here, one across town, or even two separate boxes
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
> Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
>> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
>
> What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
>
> One server here, one across town, or even two separat
Am 15.05.2012 23:19, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> What is the content of the submit.mc? Your previous log snipplet showed
>>
May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
>
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
Just in case, here is my conf for the rx instance. To repeat, this
sendmail instance sends everything to amavisd at port 10024.
- Jussi
divert(-1)dnl
include(`/usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
VER
On Wed, 16 May 2012 00:31:22 +0300
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> BTW, the two servers are virtual machines in one and the same physical box.
What's the point of that? (Genuine question.)
One server here, one across town, or even two separate boxes in a single room
-- sure. But in the same box? If the
On 16.5.2012 0.24, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hmmm... dumb question: is anything out of disk space?
There are no dumb questions here. :-) The culprit has to be something
simple like that. However, df shows that there is still room.
- Jussi
___
CentOS ma
On 16.5.2012 0.18, John Hinton wrote:
> A couple of things to check. I don't know if these servers are in the
> same location or not but it is possible if not, that your provider
> blocks port 25. Here are two configs to check.
Thanks for input. I can make the contact from the backup-mailserver to
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:52:05AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5726
>>
>> I think it has to do with shutdown/reboots versus suspend/resume.
>
> FWIW, I hit this last week; had shut down the host to do a har
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Florian La Roche
wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:52:05AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Florian La Roche
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I also tend to favour shutdown/reboots for kvm guests instead of
>> > suspend/resume...
>>
>> > Florian La
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> What is the content of the submit.mc? Your previous log snipplet showed
>>
>>> > May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
>
>> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
>
> Yes. In a dual sendma
On 15.5.2012 23.54, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> What is the content of the submit.mc? Your previous log snipplet showed
>
>> > May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
> So there must be "sm-mta-rx" be defined somewhere.
Yes. In a dual sendmail setup there are two instan
On 5/15/2012 4:57 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 5/15/2012 4:48 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>> On 15.5.2012 23.22, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>>> It is technically impossible that the telnet to target port 25 succeeds
>>> from the same system on which the Sendmail gets a connection refused,
>>> unless Sendma
On 05/15/2012 04:19 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 05:22 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 May 2012, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm working on automating virtual machine installs using kickstart files
>>> and virt-install. The problem I have is that these k
On 5/15/2012 4:48 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> On 15.5.2012 23.22, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> It is technically impossible that the telnet to target port 25 succeeds
>> from the same system on which the Sendmail gets a connection refused,
>> unless Sendmail is configured to use a non-standard target po
Am 15.05.2012 22:48, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> Below is my thishost-tx.mc. It looks totally ok to me, but maybe
> somebody else spots something there. This is a dual-sendmail setup, and
> this is the conf for the transmitting sendmail instance.
>
> - Jussi
>
> divert(-1)dnl
> include(`/usr/share/s
On 15.5.2012 23.33, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Is there any chance that your sendmail is sending an invalid id?
Uh, what do you mean by id? Domain name? I assume that comes from
/etc/sysconfig/network. which correctly says
> HOSTNAME=mx2.greenspot.fi
- Jussi
__
On 15.5.2012 23.22, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> It is technically impossible that the telnet to target port 25 succeeds
> from the same system on which the Sendmail gets a connection refused,
> unless Sendmail is configured to use a non-standard target port.
That is why I am baffled. :-/
I could us
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> Some more info. Below is a more complete telnet session from backup mail
> server (mx2.greenspot.fi) to primary mail server (mail.greenspot.fi).
>
> It only proves that sending mail works fine from command-line. But my
> sendmail setup cannot do the same.
Is there any chance t
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:52:05AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Florian La Roche
> wrote:
>
> > I also tend to favour shutdown/reboots for kvm guests instead of
> > suspend/resume...
>
> > Florian La Roche
>
> Slightly OT now, but, Florian, can you take a look at
Some more info. Below is a more complete telnet session from backup mail
server (mx2.greenspot.fi) to primary mail server (mail.greenspot.fi).
It only proves that sending mail works fine from command-line. But my
sendmail setup cannot do the same.
I wrote that MAILER-DAEMON can get mail through
Am 15.05.2012 21:44, schrieb Jussi Hirvi:
> Our backup mail server (which I have just re-configured) tries to
> contact the primary mail server, and fails. My log shows repeatedly
> "connection refused":
>
> May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
> (mail.greenspot.f
Hello everyone,
I'm streaming audio on CentOS 5.8 with no problem, even on a cheap sound
card using DarkIce as the input tool. For the input under CentOS5, I use:
device= /dev/dsp # OSS DSP soundcard device for the audio input
But under CentOS 6.2, there is no such device. I see /dev/snd,
On 05/14/2012 04:14 PM, Michael Lampe wrote:
> wrote:
>
erm... that is going to mean that everytime there is an update for
either QT or anything that it links into or anything that is in a lib
associated down that chain - the entire stack needs to be rebuilt. Are
you sure this
Our backup mail server (which I have just re-configured) tries to
contact the primary mail server, and fails. My log shows repeatedly
"connection refused":
May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
(mail.greenspot.fi. [83.143.217.182]) failed: Connection refused by
ma
Hi,
I'm looking for the ldirectord package but can't find it. Previously this
was available as "heartbeat-ldirectord" and nowadays it is built as an
independent package from "resource-agents" however neither seems to be
available either in core centos 6 or epel. Where did it go?
Regards,
Dennis
Hello all,
I am looking for a LAMP (perl) consultant. Preference given to
one who is located in Canada.
If you are interested, please contact me by email off list.
Thanks.
Milton Calnek / Manager of Operations / LiveBlock Auctions International
P. 306.584.1383 / C. 306.526.84
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:10 +, Shiv. NK wrote:
> Thanks for the information sent. VPN is between two Cisco routers. using
> SNMP, it is possible to monitor the interface traffic for a snmp enabled
> device through Zabbix/Cacti. But cannot differentiate between the the kind
> of traffic.
> Sayin
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 15/05/2012 16:10, Shiv. NK wrote:
Can you provide a somewhat less generic term for "the VPN traffic"?
If the VPN has an interface, then you can monitor this like you monitor
any other interface, yes with Nagios / Cacti and the like...
Dear Glies,
Thanks for the information sent. VPN is b
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:52:05AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5726
>
> I think it has to do with shutdown/reboots versus suspend/resume.
FWIW, I hit this last week; had shut down the host to do a hardware
upgrade (eSATA controller, 12Tb of disks). After I broug
> Can you provide a somewhat less generic term for "the VPN traffic"?
>
> If the VPN has an interface, then you can monitor this like you monitor
> any other interface, yes with Nagios / Cacti and the like...
>
Dear Glies,
Thanks for the information sent. VPN is between two Cisco routers. using
On 15/05/2012 15:56, Shiv. NK wrote:
Hi List Members,
i understand that perhaps i should not ask this question here. But you all
are technical. Therefor, has anyone ever monitor the VPN traffic using any
open source tools such as Zabbix/Nagios/Cacti? or any other
Thanks
Can you provide a
Hi List Members,
i understand that perhaps i should not ask this question here. But you all
are technical. Therefor, has anyone ever monitor the VPN traffic using any
open source tools such as Zabbix/Nagios/Cacti? or any other
Thanks
___
CentOS mai
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Florian La Roche
wrote:
> I also tend to favour shutdown/reboots for kvm guests instead of
> suspend/resume...
> Florian La Roche
Slightly OT now, but, Florian, can you take a look at
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5726
I think it has to do with shutdown/r
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:42:52PM -0700, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 05/13/2012 10:16 AM, bob wrote:
> >
> > from what i get it is a problem with libvirt, using a bridge that is
> > going through a bondon the same machine.
> > It must be rather detailed to fix and only a few people seem to use tha
On 05/15/2012 05:22 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2012, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm working on automating virtual machine installs using kickstart files
>> and virt-install. The problem I have is that these kickstart installations
>> install different packages than a
On a new server's CentOS5 install, with nothing in the way of applications
running yet, I noticed that the load average was sitting between 2 and 5
all the time, even though top told me CPU was 100% idle.
Eventually I found that stopping the "cpuspeed" subsystem allowed the
load average to drop do
> On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:47:12 -
> "Shiv. NK" wrote:
>
>> Hi list Members,
>>
>> i receive one email everyday (system report) from CentOS5, such as ssh
>> attempt made, available disk space etc..
>>
>> but CentOS 6.2 does not do that. Any idea why that?
> install logwatch (and configure postf
On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:47:12 -
"Shiv. NK" wrote:
> Hi list Members,
>
> i receive one email everyday (system report) from CentOS5, such as ssh
> attempt made, available disk space etc..
>
> but CentOS 6.2 does not do that. Any idea why that?
install logwatch (and configure postfix or sendma
Hi list Members,
i receive one email everyday (system report) from CentOS5, such as ssh
attempt made, available disk space etc..
but CentOS 6.2 does not do that. Any idea why that?
Thanks / Shiv. NK
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone used fscache and what their experience was. Is it
stable and available on Centos 5.8?
--
--- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.--
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
On 14/05/2012 19:15, Steve Clark wrote:
> Yes the fc12 version loads just fine.
> ipsec-tools-0.7.3-4.fc12.i686
>
So it's not in CentOS 6.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
49 matches
Mail list logo
