- Original Message -
>
> > I see a delay after all packages are installed as well sometimes
> > and I
> > think this has something to do with post-install jobs that have to
> > be done.
> > How big is your boot partition?
>
> I see a huge delay as well, and I think it's unrelated to %po
> I see a delay after all packages are installed as well sometimes and I
> think this has something to do with post-install jobs that have to be done.
> How big is your boot partition?
I see a huge delay as well, and I think it's unrelated to %post. I've timed
my kickstart file %post section a
Rhugga Harper wrote on 05/17/2012 03:58 PM:
> I just installed CentOS 5.6 32-bit
Have you tried installing the current/supported CentOS-5 release 5.8?
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Original Message -
> On 05/18/2012 11:19 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> Greetings-
> >>>
> >>> I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
> >>> running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPU
On 05/18/2012 05:32 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Hi,
> I just learned that there exists a "z-stream" channel upstream that
> apparently carries some important bugfixes. Does anyone know what the
> policies are for this channel and how this relates to centos releases?
>
> Regards,
> Dennis
On 05/18/2012 11:19 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> - Original Message -
>>> Greetings-
>>>
>>> I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
>>> running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB
>>> RAM, and 160GB HDD. Installation
Hi,
I just learned that there exists a "z-stream" channel upstream that
apparently carries some important bugfixes. Does anyone know what the
policies are for this channel and how this relates to centos releases?
Regards,
Dennis
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Tim Nelson wrote:
Surely *someone* has installed CentOS 6 in a KVM VM and gotten it to
work? :)
Time after time after time. :-)
--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
htt
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> - Original Message -
>> > Greetings-
>> >
>> > I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
>> > running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB
>> > RAM, and 160GB HD
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > Greetings-
> >
> > I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine
> > running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB
> > RAM, and 160GB HDD. Installation proceeds fine using either minimal
> > or n
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:23 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/18/12 10:09 AM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> > 99 2425 1 4052 136382123488
> /opt/ictools/64bit/synopsys-aserver/bin/AServer
> ^^
>
> well, I dunno what that process is, but thats a HUGE vsiz
On 05/18/12 10:09 AM, Michael Coffman wrote:
> 99 2425 1 4052 136382123488
> /opt/ictools/64bit/synopsys-aserver/bin/AServer
^^
well, I dunno what that process is, but thats a HUGE vsize.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
sa
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
> >> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
> >> to handle that situation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
> >> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
> >> to handle that situation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
> >> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
> >> to handle that situation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
>
>> If you are already overcommitted, what do you expect to happen when
>> you say not to allow that? The kernel doesn't have a really good way
>> to handle that situation (or any other OOM condition for that
>> matter...).
>>
>>
> OK. S
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Michael Coffman
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just because one machine fails gracefully does not mean the next will.
> >>
> >
> > I don't even know what the above means.
> >
> >
> >> But really buy some ram for real. OR
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I tried to upgrade one user's system, a Dell Optiplex GX620, and yum got a
> GPF. After *much* grief, I finally gave up, and rebuilt the system.
>
> Or, rather, I'm trying to. First problem: I did a minimal install from the
> graphical installer - I don't know if that's re
I tried to upgrade one user's system, a Dell Optiplex GX620, and yum got a
GPF. After *much* grief, I finally gave up, and rebuilt the system.
Or, rather, I'm trying to. First problem: I did a minimal install from the
graphical installer - I don't know if that's relevant - but when it boots,
it do
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Michael Coffman
wrote:
>
>> Just because one machine fails gracefully does not mean the next will.
>>
>
> I don't even know what the above means.
>
>
>> But really buy some ram for real. OR solve the real problem.
>>
>>
>
> Well that's just ridiculous. 'Real probl
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:15 AM, John Stanley wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 13:08 -0600, Michael Coffman wrote:
>
> > vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
> ^^
>
> Try changing the commit ratio to a greater value (yes you can go over
> 100).
> Then sysctl -w vm.overcom
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 13:08 -0600, Michael Coffman wrote:
> vm.overcommit_ratio = 50
^^
Try changing the commit ratio to a greater value (yes you can go over
100).
Then sysctl -w vm.overcommit_memory=2
Just because one machine fails gracefully does not me
On 18/05/2012 4:21 a.m., Rhugga Harper wrote:
> We have a 2-node Oracle RAC that keeps getting the following error:
> kernel: nfs: RPC call returned error 88
>
> The storage being mounted is netapp. We don't see any errors/issues on the
> storage itself or the switches this client is connecting thr
Hi
Are there any future plans for CentOS to build and directly provide oVirt
packages compatible with CentOS 6?
If not, has anyone tried the packages available at
http://www.dreyou.org/ovirt/ and would these be considered fit for a
CentOS-based oVirt production setup?
I've heard many great things
24 matches
Mail list logo
