Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Eero Volotinen
2012/5/26 Ken godee : >>> What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? >> >> I have to check this with the client.   Credit card information will >> be encrypted and stored in client's own db. > > Yup, this is exactly what they don't want people to do and > I believe in the future they'll

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Ken godee
>> What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? > > I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will > be encrypted and stored in client's own db. Yup, this is exactly what they don't want people to do and I believe in the future they'll strive for just a handful of pr

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Eero Volotinen
2012/5/26 Arun Khan : > Hi Eero, > > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: >> 2012/5/25 Arun Khan : >>> I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. >>> >>> The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application >>> middleware (tomcat), the db server have

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Arun Khan
Hi Eero, On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2012/5/25 Arun Khan : >> I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. >> >> The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application >> middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. > >

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Arun Khan
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ken godee wrote: > wow, seems like quite a lot. > > What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will be encrypted and stored in client's own db. > The only other thing I might add > >

[CentOS] Mysterious versioning reported by file command

2012-05-25 Thread Frank Cox
I just noticed this, which doesn't actually seem to affect anything but does create a mystery: [frankcox@mutt temp]$ cat test.c #include int main(void) { printf("Hello world\n"); return 0; } [frankcox@mutt temp]$ gcc -o test test.c [frankcox@mutt temp]$ file test t

Re: [CentOS] biggest disk partition on 5.8?

2012-05-25 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
Greetings, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > Hey folks, > > I have a Sun J4400 SAS1 disk array with 24 x 1T drives in it connected > to a Sunfire x2250 running 5.8 ( 64 bit ) You can perhaps think about using GFS apart from XFS -- Regards, Rajagopal _

Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc

2012-05-25 Thread Timothy Murphy
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I think I understand how it occurred. >> I tried to yum-remove a package >> (I don't remember which one, but it wasn't important) >> and I was told that 300+ packages would be removed. >> I wasn't sure it I would be asked yes/no to this >> (I know now that I will always

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?

2012-05-25 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: >>> >>> I *do* still have an FC2 box. >>> >>> Would anyone second this procedure: >>> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945 >>> >> >> It might possibly work, but I can't quite imagine why anyone wo

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?

2012-05-25 Thread Max Pyziur
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: >> >> I *do* still have an FC2 box. >> >> Would anyone second this procedure: >> http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945 >> > > It might possibly work, but

Re: [CentOS] print job gui for remote access

2012-05-25 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 26 May 2012 00:05:40 +0200 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: > > Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using > > ssh want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B. > > > > This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?

2012-05-25 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: > > I *do* still have an FC2 box. > > Would anyone second this procedure: > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945 > It might possibly work, but I can't quite imagine why anyone would want to do it

Re: [CentOS] print job gui for remote access

2012-05-25 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Frank Cox wrote: > Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh > want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B. > > This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is > there > a GUI that I can give them? I have them running t

[CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?

2012-05-25 Thread Max Pyziur
Greetings, I *do* still have an FC2 box. Would anyone second this procedure: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945 Thanks. Max Pyziur p...@brama.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lis

[CentOS] print job gui for remote access

2012-05-25 Thread Frank Cox
Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B. This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is there a GUI that I can give them? I have them running things like scribus using laun

Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313

2012-05-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote: > Le ven. 25 mai 2012 09:42:14 CEST, Phil Schaffner a écrit: >> Check http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless to see if it supports >> your hardware with the standard kernel. > > Phil, Earl, > > Thanks for pointing me to elrepo : yes, th

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Eero Volotinen
2012/5/25 Arun Khan : > I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. > > The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application > middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. requirement "one primary function per server". > In addition the auditor h

Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences

2012-05-25 Thread Phil Schaffner
Bowie Bailey wrote on 05/25/2012 01:00 PM: > Is "Fedora Project" EPEL? Yes. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread m . roth
Ken godee wrote: > wow, seems like quite a lot. Heh. When I was working for the company, I had a guy who sat in easy earshot who was one of their folks who dealt with questions from companies and businesses. The *easiest* one, the lowest level, was 60 or 63 questions. The serious, highest one was

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Ken godee
wow, seems like quite a lot. What "level" of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? The only other thing I might add Are you hosting the hardware? If it's hosted else where then the "facility" that's hosting the hardware needs to be PCI/DSS complaint. On 5/25/2012 10:22 AM, Arun Khan wrote:

Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread m . roth
Arun Khan wrote: > I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. > > The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application > middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. > In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP > server, a "pa

[CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS

2012-05-25 Thread Arun Khan
I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a "patch" server, The Host OS on

Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences

2012-05-25 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 5/25/2012 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, John Doe wrote: >> From: Bowie Bailey >> >>> On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and >>> rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from >>> which repo? >> You could try

Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences

2012-05-25 Thread Jesus del Valle
> > > You could try something like this: > > rpm -qa --qf "%-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n" > > In 6.x, yum keeps track of where packages were installed from. > yum history packages-info packagename(s) > Hi. From http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=240877 yum list installed | grep repositoryname

Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences

2012-05-25 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: Bowie Bailey > >> On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and >> rpmforge repos.  Is there a way to determine which packages came from >> which repo? > > You could try something like this: >   rpm -qa --qf "%-30{NAME

Re: [CentOS] Force permissions by directory

2012-05-25 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Frank Cox wrote: > Is there a way to force file permissions by directory (and subdirectories > under it)? > > For example, the user's default umask value is 022 but I want it to be 002 in > certain directories. > I have cronjobs like this to regularly give group read permissions (and x for dirs)

Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences

2012-05-25 Thread John Doe
From: Bowie Bailey > On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and > rpmforge repos.  Is there a way to determine which packages came from > which repo? You could try something like this:   rpm -qa --qf "%-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n" See the man for more useful tags. JD _

[CentOS] Force permissions by directory

2012-05-25 Thread Frank Cox
Is there a way to force file permissions by directory (and subdirectories under it)? For example, the user's default umask value is 022 but I want it to be 002 in certain directories. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS

Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences

2012-05-25 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 5/24/2012 8:00 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > I'll step out on a limb here and generalize somewhat; I would think that most > CentOS users use at least one third-party repository, if the traffic on this > list is any indication (and, again, I reserve the right to be wrong). So > knowing how to prop

Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313

2012-05-25 Thread Phil Schaffner
Earl Ramirez wrote on 05/25/2012 09:37 AM: > > Philippe, > > You can try ELRepo, I believe that they have the drivers for boderdom, they > also have kernel 3.3.x, please read their note about using kernel 3.3.x. I > have tried it and I did not have any issues with it. > > http://elrepo.org/tiki/ker

Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313

2012-05-25 Thread Philippe Naudin
Le ven. 25 mai 2012 09:42:14 CEST, Phil Schaffner a écrit: > Philippe Naudin wrote on 05/25/2012 08:39 AM: > > Hello, > > > > The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is > > native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac > > since 2.6.39). > > > > Bu

Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc

2012-05-25 Thread m . roth
Tim, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> Johnny Hughes wrote: >> 3. The real issue here is to make sure you figure out HOW you got in >> this position and how NOT to get into it again. > > I think I understand how it occurred. > I tri

Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc

2012-05-25 Thread Timothy Murphy
Johnny Hughes wrote: First, thanks very much for continuing to help me. > On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >> --- Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 != glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686 >>>

Re: [CentOS] Dedup FS on 5.8

2012-05-25 Thread Alan McKay
Whoops, sorry - looking for opinions and personal experiences -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”          - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/

[CentOS] Dedup FS on 5.8

2012-05-25 Thread Alan McKay
Hey folks, I have a 14TB disk array that I want to use for rsnapshot backups, and am considering putting a dedup FS onto it. I know I've got about a TB of duplication, at least. And it is not easy to remove manually. Google lands me LessFS and SDFS as the prime candidates. thanks, -Alan -- “

Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313

2012-05-25 Thread Phil Schaffner
Philippe Naudin wrote on 05/25/2012 08:39 AM: > Hello, > > The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is > native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac > since 2.6.39). > > But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? > > Thanks, > Chec

Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313

2012-05-25 Thread Earl Ramirez
On 25 May 2012 08:39, Philippe Naudin wrote: > Hello, > > The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is > native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac > since 2.6.39). > > But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? > > Thanks, > > --

[CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313

2012-05-25 Thread Philippe Naudin
Hello, The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac since 2.6.39). But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? Thanks, -- Philippe Naudin ___

Re: [CentOS] compiling python

2012-05-25 Thread Phil Schaffner
Rita wrote on 05/25/2012 06:29 AM: > Hello, > > I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there > were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard > python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas > would be much appreciate

Re: [CentOS] compiling python

2012-05-25 Thread John Doe
From: Rita >I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there >were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard >python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas >would be much appreciated. Read the file README from the py

Re: [CentOS] biggest disk partition on 5.8?

2012-05-25 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 14.23.31 Alan McKay wrote: > Hey folks, ... > I used 'arcconf' to create a big RAID60 out of (see below). > > But then I mount it and it is way too small > This should be about 20TB : ... > /dev/sdb1 186G 60M 176G 1% /mnt/J4400-1 ... > Here is how I create

[CentOS] compiling python

2012-05-25 Thread Rita
Hello, I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas would be much appreciated. -- --- Get your facts first, then you c

Re: [CentOS] openldap mmr + heartbeat hot standby

2012-05-25 Thread Benjamin Hackl
Dear Wessel, I'd do the following. give both servers a static non changing IP: ldapA.yourdomain.tld, e.g. 10.0.0.1 on eth0 ldapB.yourdomain.tld, e.g. 10.0.0.2 on eth0 These two IPs will always be the same. You can access ldapA or ldapB anytime via it's designated name. For failover, use an ali

Re: [CentOS] Installing CIFS on CentOS4

2012-05-25 Thread Benjamin Hackl
Dear Jeff, On Thu, 24 May 2012 15:16:13 -1000 Jeff Sadino wrote: > I have a CentOS4 install and I am trying to mount a Windows Server > 2008 folder. When I use this command: You can try the sernet samba repositories. http://www.sernet.de/en/ http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/centos/4/sernet-