CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0727
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0727.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0731 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0731.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0730 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0730.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0729 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0729.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0731 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0731.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Hola Lista, alguien me puede ayudar, *este correo me regresa en el servidor:
*
The original message was received at Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:41:50 -0700
from [192.168.3.95]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
arturokna...@hotmail.com
(reason: 550 SC-001 (BAY0-MC4-F22)
On 06/13/2012 01:18 PM, Felipe Cabada wrote:
Hola Lista, alguien me puede ayudar, *este correo me regresa en el servidor:
*
The original message was received at Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:41:50 -0700
from [192.168.3.95]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
La respuesta en el mismo enlace, pero lo más es que no funcione, vaya
buscando un servidor relay de correo confiable, saludos
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be easier to suggest an approach if you describe what you
need to do. You can't magically make new public addresses that aren't
available appear on an existing network, whether it is on real or
virtual NICs.
Is it possible to pass the Network port to a virtual host and have a
minimal Firewall, IDS/IPS install there and this virtual host to be
the Gateway to the Network for the host as well as other virtual
hosts? I am talking specifically Centos 6.2 KVM/Xen.
Also, what harware requirements need to
On 06/12/12 11:52 PM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
And I want routing among three as well as Internet access through thet
NATTED adsl router which has a dynamic IP.
for that sort of routing to work, all the other hosts on hte 2 LANs will
need to know the route to that subnet is via the NIC interfaces
On 12/06/2012 21:45, Michael Kress wrote:
Am 12.06.2012 22:39, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 12.06.2012 22:19, schrieb Michael Kress:
Hello, is there any way of getting php4 installed on Centos6? I'd like
to install it in an apache/fastcgi environment.
Has anybody got a link to a
On 08/06/2012 17:33, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I've got a CentOS 5 server that I want to migrate over into a
virtualized instance.
The problem is I need to minimize downtime so was trying to figure out
a way to live clone the original.
Initially, I thought I could do this via exporting an
I have a system that is logging:
smartd /dev/sda currently unreadble (pending) sectors
smartd /dev/sda offline uncorrectable sectors
The box continues to run fine.
Doing smartctl -H /dev/sda says:
test result: PASSED
I have ran the smartctl -t offline /dev/sda, after the 300+ seconds I
Hello,
IIRC, the exit status of yum install foo bar was (long ago !) 0 only
if foo *and* bar could be installed.
Nowadays, it is 0 if foo *or* bar (or both) are correctly installed.
Is there a way to get the old behavior ?
Thanks,
--
Philippe Naudin
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
A process implemented in the userland may not be as efficient as one
implemented as part of the kernel - but that doesn't mean it can't scale
well,
Boris Epstein wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:50 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
snip
To be specific, I use UNFSD to export a MooseFS file system. MooseFS, by
the way, is userland-process based too.
Be that as it
I'm using KVM so didn't have the tool.
While Les' suggestion looked like it was going to be pretty useful for
a variety of backup/restore situations, I didn't know if I had the
time to go through the docs and get things working in time.
So in the end I went with the repeated rSync method Scott
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Sanjay Arora sanjay.k.ar...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be easier to suggest an approach if you describe what you
need to do. You can't magically make new public addresses that aren't
available appear on an existing network, whether it is on real or
virtual
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hello,
CentOS 6.2.
I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
permissions
on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is this
so convoluted!?
I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me how to do this.
The default permissions
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
CentOS 6.2.
I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
permissions
on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is this
so convoluted!?
I would really appreciate it if someone could tell me how to do
On 06/13/2012 12:29 PM, James Pearson wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
CentOS 6.2.
I have spent all morning googling and trying different things to get the
permissions
on my ttyUSB0 port set correctly using udev. I am at my wits end. Why is
this so convoluted!?
I would really
CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
also reduced the reserved blocks by 1/3rd.
I've just finished an fsck, which
On 2012-06-13, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
also reduced the
On 06/13/2012 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
also reduced the reserved
On 06/13/2012 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free. I
also reduced the reserved
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/13/2012 12:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6.2. I have a 2TB drive, one partition, which is used for online
backups. It filled up the other day. I moved a couple of b/u directories
off it, and deleted the originals, which should have given me 42G free.
I also
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Actually, IIRC, one directory was 42G, and the other was 15G or so. That,
along with reducing the reserved blocks on the f/s should have given me
3%-4%. I know that; what's driving me nuts is df, not df -h, is showing
available as a
Hello Tom,
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:12 +0100, Tom Brown wrote:
To close the loop on this by making the 32 bit tar package available
to the system during the update allowed the update to progress as it
got pulled in as a dep during the yum run and all was happy.
I suppose my idea that this
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Actually, IIRC, one directory was 42G, and the other was 15G or so.
That, along with reducing the reserved blocks on the f/s should have
given me
3%-4%. I know that; what's driving me nuts is df, not df -h, is
How about using one of the backup tools to image the server?
We use Symantec System Recovery and image all the disks. We then have the
option of restoring to different hardware (physical or virtual) which works
very well.
There's a 60-day evaluation period.
On Wednesday 13 June 2012, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
If it was 100% full, and if you freed up 42GB, then it would be:
2006/2048 = 98% full (well, 97.95% to be exact).
so it would only show 2% space free max anyway.
And by default 5% is reserved for root, so a drive can be 5%
Did not get any response in the CentOS Virt list.
Posting in the CentOS General list hoping that some one here can
provide clarification.
Thx,
-- Arun Khan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Arun Khan
Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:54 PM
Subject: Meaning of vlan= and name= in Linux
34 matches
Mail list logo
