On 6/10/12, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:09:28PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> #raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 raid.253001 raid.253065
>
> Maybe try
> raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 --useexisting
> Or
> raid / --fstype=ext4 --device=md0 --u
On Jun 15, 2012, at 17:11, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> please file this at bugs.centos.org - so we can make sure its not an
> issue we introduced.
Done: issue number 0005778 has been filed.
Alfred
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cent
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
denni...@conversis.de> wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 09:10 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
> > Greetings -
> >
> > I had a logical volume that was running out of space on a virtual
> machine.
> > I successfully expanded the LV using lvextend, and lvdisplay s
Thanks guys!, John you can send me a simple filter for fail2ban+SMTP? I
tried use the following filters, but this is no sufficient for my yet.
*/etc/fail2ban/filter.d/sendmail.conf*
[Definition]
failregex = \[\], reject.*\.\.\. Relaying denied
(User unknown)\n* \[\]
badlo
Quoting Bob Hoffman :
> I have been using centos 6 in a virtualized system for a few months now.
> Took a while to batten down the hatches with postfix, rbls, and to use
> fail2ban correctly.
Thanks for this,Bob. I'm having trouble making fail2ban work in my
Centos 5.8 box. Would you be willing
On 6/14/2012 8:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
> simply are dynamic).
>
>
That is the same problem I am dealing with. You have to set up a dual
ma
I have been using centos 6 in a virtualized system for a few months now.
Took a while to batten down the hatches with postfix, rbls, and to use
fail2ban correctly.
The mailserver for my website(s) are located on the http server as
well..an 'all in one' server.
DNS servers are separated.
My two s
On 06/15/2012 08:09 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
>
> Thanks, that's a good idea. Unfortunately, I don't have time to do this
> today. I did, however, track this down to the root cause. The user I was
> changing to was using tcsh as their shell (like many of our users are), and
> this problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can you step back and ignore this policy for now. What AVC's are you seeing
when you attempt to run passenger on Centos/RHEL?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.o
On 06/15/2012 09:10 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> I had a logical volume that was running out of space on a virtual machine.
> I successfully expanded the LV using lvextend, and lvdisplay shows that it
> has been expanded. Then I went to expand the filesystem to fill the new
> space
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:10:09PM -0700, Jeff Boyce wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> I had a logical volume that was running out of space on a virtual machine.
> I successfully expanded the LV using lvextend, and lvdisplay shows that it
> has been expanded. Then I went to expand the filesystem to fill
Greetings -
I had a logical volume that was running out of space on a virtual machine.
I successfully expanded the LV using lvextend, and lvdisplay shows that it
has been expanded. Then I went to expand the filesystem to fill the new
space (# resize2fs -p /dev/vde1) and I get the results that
On Jun 15, 2012, at 14:52, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up, but you should really take issues like this
> upstream. There's nothing the CentOS can or at least will do as they
> rebuild upstream ad verbatim. Try the RHEL 6 mailing list:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listi
I recently setup my Puppetmaster server to run through Passenger via Apache
instead of on the default webrick web server. SELinux made that not work
and I've found some documentation on making rules to allow it however mine
won't load. This is the policy I found via this website,
http://sandcat.n
Hello ALfred,
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 13:14 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> I did a "yum update" on my CentOS 6 systems yesterday for the first time
> in about a month and now have some automated processes failing because
> the PATH is not set up correctly when using "su".
Thanks for the heads up,
On 06/15/2012 09:33 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/15/12 9:25 AM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
>> 1.) install& configure fail2ban
> each of the connections shown in the log fragment was from a different
> IP. how would fail2ban help?
>
>
>
If you were to switch to postfix, I believe that postscreen may
I did a "yum update" on my CentOS 6 systems yesterday for the first time in
about a month and now have some automated processes failing because the PATH is
not set up correctly when using "su". The problem is very easy to see by
comparing the output of the following two commands:
# su - -
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/15/12 9:25 AM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
>> 1.) install& configure fail2ban
>
> each of the connections shown in the log fragment was from a different
> IP. how would fail2ban help?
>
Interesting - I hadn't looked that closely. You're right - if it's one
attack, it's a distri
Shiv. Nath wrote:
> On 6/14/12 11:33 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
>> Dear CentOS Community
>>
>> Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need
>> to stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today,
>> my maillog look like :
>>
>> 4...@myserver.com>, pro
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Shiv. Nath
wrote:
> >>
>> I need help for STOP this spamers right now.
>>
>> Thanks in advance to anyone who can guide me
[...]
> i trust this helps, there is another solution but you do not use Postfix.
Sendmail is nearly infinitely configurable - and not all t
On 6/15/12 2:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
>> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
>> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
>> simply are dynamic).
>>
> Give them login
On 06/15/12 9:25 AM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
> 1.) install& configure fail2ban
each of the connections shown in the log fragment was from a different
IP. how would fail2ban help?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
On 6/14/12 11:33 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> Dear CentOS Community
>
> Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need to
> stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today, my
> maillog look like :
>
> 4...@myserver.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, rela
We use Cyrus-imapd together with Postix to effect final delivery of
email messages to our clients. The final delivery server is isolated
from the internet via a firewall and only pre-authorized host
addresses can connect. All user pickup and delivery email traffic is
handled through separate Inte
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
>
>>
>> You still don't say what kind of access you need
>
> Basically accessing the VMs from the Internetssh, vnc, rdp, ftp &
> so on...different needs for different vm.
You should be able to make outbound connections that originate from
On 06/15/2012 06:43 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 14/06/2012 18:07, Steve Campbell wrote:
>> We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
>>
>> Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
>> web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
>>
On 14/06/2012 18:07, Steve Campbell wrote:
We have a situation here that is a real mystery.
Our MRTG on our outgoing router and a firewall server that protects our
web servers is showing a spike every six hours. I can't find the server
behind the firewall that is generating such an extreme amou
27 matches
Mail list logo
