On 07/12/2012 07:23 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> In your kickstart file add this line: (this is for 5.x - not
> tested it on 6.x yet)
>
> # Turn off SELinux.
> selinux --disabled
All the CentOS machines I've installed have had
selinux set to disabled this way.
However, the packet selinux-policy-tar
On 07/11/2012 02:53 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've been trying to install centos 6.2, then 6.3 onto a
> supermicro 6013P-8 which does not have a DVD rom drive.
> Those newer version of CentOS only have DVD (not CD) iso
> versions so I've been sharing the
> install via NFS.
>
> With each
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 02:44:45PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
[lots of detail]
> However, I just patched to CentOS 6.3 and on reboot this array failed
> to be built. The 2.6.32-279 kernel complained that /dev/sdj was too
> similar to /dev/sdj3. But I reboot to -220.23.1 then it works.
Well no
On 07/11/2012 02:53 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've been trying to install centos 6.2, then 6.3 onto a supermicro 6013P-8
> which does not have a DVD rom drive. Those newer version of CentOS only
> have DVD (not CD) iso versions so I've been sharing the install via NFS.
>
>
> With each try
Or create a simple kickstart file that would specify the HTTP or FTP method
and install from a public mirror?
Andrew Reis
Microsoft Windows/Networking Support
Webmaster
DBMS Inc.
Toll-Free: (888) 862-0662 ext. 307
Direct: (318) 219-5034
a...@dbmsinc.com
http://www.dbmsinc.com
-Original Messa
Hi Tim,
What if you symlink the shared nfs dir to /var/www/html/somedir and try
the http protocol? May help?
Phil
On 07/11/2012 02:53 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've been trying to install centos 6.2, then 6.3 onto a supermicro 6013P-8
> which does not have a DVD rom drive. Those newe
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Colin Simpson
> wrote:
> >
> > But think yourself lucky, BTRFS on Fedora 16 was much worse. This
> > was
> > the time it took me to untar a vlc tarball.
> >
> > F16 to RHEL5 - 0m 28.170s
> > F16 to F16 ext4 - 4m 12.450s
> > F16 to
If you use a kickstart file to build unattended servers (eg virt-install)
then new disks or virtual volumes will cause problems unless you have
"zerombr true" in the kickstart file
eg
zerombr yes
clearpart --all --initlabel
part /boot --fstype=ext4 --asprimary --size=100
part swap --asprima
Namely:
* hivex
* hivex-devel
* librdmac
* librdmac-devel
* sanlock-libs
* sanlock-devel
and maybe others.
Is this on purpose (I don't know if upstream has removed or updated the
32-bit rpms, but the old ones are still in C6.3/x86_64), or is it just
the usual sloppyness (I've been told here on
Gé Weijers wrote:
> This is likely to be a bug in RHEL5 rather than one in RHEL6. RHEL5
> (kernel 2.6.18) does not always guarantee that the disk cache is
> flushed before 'fsync' returns. This is especially true if you use
> software RAID and/or LVM. You may be able to get the old performance
> ba
This is likely to be a bug in RHEL5 rather than one in RHEL6. RHEL5
(kernel 2.6.18) does not always guarantee that the disk cache is
flushed before 'fsync' returns. This is especially true if you use
software RAID and/or LVM. You may be able to get the old performance
back by disabling I/O barriers
Guys,
I've been trying to install centos 6.2, then 6.3 onto a supermicro 6013P-8
which does not have a DVD rom drive. Those newer version of CentOS only
have DVD (not CD) iso versions so I've been sharing the install via NFS.
With each try the install hangs forever installing
'selinux-policy-ta
If you're updating your CentOS 5.X installation regularly at all, xz
and xz-libs should be automatically downloaded as a dependency for
something, can't quite remember what. Most of our 5.X machines have
pulled it when updates are run weekly.
---
_ANDREW REIS_
MCTS,
Network+
Software/Network
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Neither ... :)
>
> I guess those are very valid reasons. The explanation was a little
> convoluted and my lack of sleep prevented me from actually
> understanding most of it, yet I
Just grab the xz package.
I roll initrds (for a custom pxe boot setup) on a CentOS 5.8 host.
I've rerolled the initrd for 6.2 some time ago and you've reminded me
to take care of 6.3 today.
Name : xz
Arch : x86_64
Version: 4.999.9
Release: 0.3.beta.20091007git.el5
Size :
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Neither ... :)
I guess those are very valid reasons. The explanation was a little
convoluted and my lack of sleep prevented me from actually
understanding most of it, yet I managed to decipher the last
paragraph... so if I install CentOS 3.6
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Colin Simpson
wrote:
>
> But think yourself lucky, BTRFS on Fedora 16 was much worse. This was
> the time it took me to untar a vlc tarball.
>
> F16 to RHEL5 - 0m 28.170s
> F16 to F16 ext4 - 4m 12.450s
> F16 to F16 btrfs - 14m 31.252s
>
> A quick test seems to sa
On 07/11/2012 07:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2012/6/red-hat-enterprise-linux-63-globally-available
>
> "Developer Tools: In addition to OpenJDK6 support in Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux 6, the newly introduced OpenJDK7 allows customers
> running Red Hat Ent
We have this issue.
I have a support call open with Red Hat about it. Bug reports will only
really forcibly get actioned if you open a support call and point at the
bug report.
I also have this issue though much much worse on Fedora (using BTRFS),
which will surely have to be fixed before BTRFS b
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>
>> On 11 July 2012 13:06, Steve Clark wrote:
>> > I think it is more the fact the Oracle seems to be two faced in their
>> dealings with foss as opposed to IBM.
>> So correct. Way back in 2001, in London I was there when IBM clearly
>> stated they
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
wrote:
> On 7/11/12, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Hours? This should happen in the time it takes to transfer a
>> directory listing and read through it unless you used --ignore-times
>> in the arguments. If you have many millions of files or not en
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> What format is the images/pxeboot/initrd.img file on the DVD ?
>
> Its not gzip
> its not straight cpio
>
> What is it?
> I wish to change it.
>
> I'm finding information on changing the gzip version of initrd
> but not the PXE one.
>
> If I do
Please write your concern to supp...@redhat.com. No one here really
cares, because it's off topic. Thank you for your cooperation.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> On 11 July 2012 13:06, Steve Clark wrote:
> > I think it is more the fact the Oracle seems to be two faced in their
> > dealings with foss as
> > opposed to IBM.
> So correct. Way back in 2001, in London I was there when IBM clearly
> stated they are going to spend one b
On 07/11/2012 06:58 AM, Chris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded my centos 6.2 machine (KVM virtualization host) to 6.3.
>
> Do I need to upgrade my virtual machine config files?
>
> Result: /etc/libvirt/qemu/*.xml
>
> hvm
>
> Expected result:
>
> hvm
>
> --
> Chris
You shouldn't need to, no. I
On 07/11/2012 02:48 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> If I do "file initrd.img" it just says data.
$ file initrd.img
initrd.img: LZMA compressed data, streamed
That may give you a hint.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
CentOS mailing
What format is the images/pxeboot/initrd.img file on the DVD ?
Its not gzip
its not straight cpio
What is it?
I wish to change it.
I'm finding information on changing the gzip version of initrd
but not the PXE one.
If I do "file initrd.img" it just says data.
Thanks,
Jerry
___
Hello,
I recently upgraded a server from CentOS 6.2 to 6.3
I found a change in the behavior of rsyslog's configuration file that
I found particularly interesting.
The "$PreserveFQDN on" directive was not being recognized as the
config remained unchanged during the upgrade. This incorrect behavior
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2012/6/red-hat-enterprise-linux-63-globally-available
"Developer Tools: In addition to OpenJDK6 support in Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 6, the newly introduced OpenJDK7 allows customers
running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3 to develop and test with the
latest ve
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> I think it is more the fact the Oracle seems to be two faced in their
> dealings with foss as
> opposed to IBM.
Since the Sun acquisition, and despite the LO-OpenOffice spat (which
btw the 'community' forkers destroyed the future of the former
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> I think this is getting dangerously close to trolling.
Not really, I just wanted to express my POV, which is not the
mainstream opinion.
I didn t come here to argue against LO in CentOS, the OP did. For me,
fine, I'll just ignore it, as
On Wednesday 11 July 2012, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> The jihadists against Sun Contributor Agreement created the so-called
> "exodus" of programmers from OpenOffice.org to "Libre" Office, then
> spit Oracle in the eye and subsequently invited them for dinner (to
> join "the document foundation").
On 11 July 2012 13:06, Steve Clark wrote:
> I think it is more the fact the Oracle seems to be two faced in their
> dealings with foss as
> opposed to IBM.
So correct. Way back in 2001, in London I was there when IBM clearly
stated they are going to spend one billion on Linux on that year. They
d
On 07/11/2012 07:28 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
>> Most informed people know how much Oracle has
>> contributed to OSS, but also how it has tried 'monetize' other stuff
> Gee, someone could think that they are a for-profit corporation, like
> I
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> Most informed people know how much Oracle has
> contributed to OSS, but also how it has tried 'monetize' other stuff
Gee, someone could think that they are a for-profit corporation, like
IBM (whose DB2 is NOT open source, or Lotus Notes, also
Hello,
I upgraded my centos 6.2 machine (KVM virtualization host) to 6.3.
Do I need to upgrade my virtual machine config files?
Result: /etc/libvirt/qemu/*.xml
hvm
Expected result:
hvm
--
Chris
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:25 AM, John R Pierce
> wrote:
> > LibreOffice was created when Oracle bought Sun, a bunch of the core
> > developers quit and started their own project,
>
> BS if you ask me...
> Oracle bought Sun in APRIL 2009.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:25 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> LibreOffice was created when Oracle bought Sun, a bunch of the core
> developers quit and started their own project,
BS if you ask me...
Oracle bought Sun in APRIL 2009.
Sun programmers, on Oracle´s payroll, kept developing OpenOffice.org
a
Hi,
I'm currently setting up an IP accouting machine using CentOS 6 and pmacct,
compiled from source. The machine has two network interfaces :
- a "normal" one, used for SSH remote administration and viewing the
accouting data through a webserver (eth0)
- a "monitor" one, plugged into a mirror
39 matches
Mail list logo
