On 08/04/2012 01:43 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, SilverTip257 wrote:
>
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> From: SilverTip257
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] iptables rule question for Centos 5
>>
>> Marvin,
>>
>> You're leaving SSH open to the world with that.
>> If this is a box b
> You could also consider just sticking to tuned and then having a look at the
> power management options as provided there. tuned-adm list will show you
> some predefined power management options which *can* be tweaked.
I have made many tests with tuned and written small scripts to switch
from
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 02:37:54AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Moving the port to a non-standard port is better than nothing ... but
> only be a very slight bit. It might work on the least knowledgeable
> script kiddies who only look at port 22, but it will do nothing to hide
> the fact that it
On 04.08.2012 15:01, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> hello
> i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
> i want to share it on network via nfs.
> which file system is better for it?
> thank you
> ———
> Ashkan R
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http
thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scenario.
but i think ext4 is notbas fast as others. is it true?
———
Ashkan R
On Aug 4, 2012 6:39 PM, "Nux!" wrote:
> On 04.08.2012 15:01, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> > hello
> > i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
> > i want to share it on netwo
On 04.08.2012 15:19, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scenario.
> but i think ext4 is notbas fast as others. is it true?
>
> ———
> Ashkan R
> On Aug 4, 2012 6:39 PM, "Nux!" wrote:
>
>> On 04.08.2012 15:01, ashkab rahmani wrote:
>> > hello
>> > i have 16tb s
thank you. very usefull
i think i'll try btrfs or jfs,
i'll send you btrfs result for you.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 04.08.2012 15:19, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> > thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scenario.
> > but i think ext4 is notbas fast as others. is it
On 04.08.2012 15:36, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> thank you. very usefull
> i think i'll try btrfs or jfs,
> i'll send you btrfs result for you.
Ilsistemista.net seems to have some good articles about filesystems.
e.g.
http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/linux-a-unix/33-btrfs-vs-ext3-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-
On 08/04/2012 09:36 AM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> thank you. very usefull
> i think i'll try btrfs or jfs,
> i'll send you btrfs result for you.
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> On 04.08.2012 15:19, ashkab rahmani wrote:
>>> thank you i have redundancy but i have simplified scena
On 04.08.2012 16:36, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> thank you. very usefull
> i think i'll try btrfs or jfs,
> i'll send you btrfs result for you.
Please note: The Btrfs code of CentOS 6.3 is based on kernel 2.6.32.
This is very experimental.
If you want to try Btrfs, then use kernel 3.2 or higher. (th
Nux! wrote:
> ZFS on linux is still highly experimental and has received close to no
> testing.
> If you are in mood for experiments EL6.3 includes BTRFS as technology
> preview for 64bit machines. Give it a try and let us know how it goes.
Using BTRFS now is like using ZFS in 2005.
ZFS is ad
Reindl Harald wrote:
> face the truth!
>
> there is no ZFS for linux
> there will never be
>
> that you do not like GPL, Linux etc. at all will
> not change anything, not now and not in the future
What do you expect from spreading lies against me?
You are off topic, so please stop this nonsense
On Friday, August 03, 2012 12:03:01 PM Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/03/2012 04:25 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > rpm -qa | while read line; do echo $line && rpm --setugids $line; done
> > should handle ownerships. Then, reenable selinux in permissive mode, and
> > set it to relabel on the ne
On 08/04/2012 05:06 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Using BTRFS now is like using ZFS in 2005.
> ZFS is adult now, BTRFS is not
Can you quantify this in an impartial format as relevant to CentOS ? At
the moment your statement is just a rant, and having come across your
work in the past, I know you c
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/04/2012 05:06 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Using BTRFS now is like using ZFS in 2005.
> > ZFS is adult now, BTRFS is not
>
> Can you quantify this in an impartial format as relevant to CentOS ? At
> the moment your statement is just a rant, and having come across
On 04.08.2012 20:32, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 08/04/2012 05:06 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> > Using BTRFS now is like using ZFS in 2005.
>> > ZFS is adult now, BTRFS is not
> ZFS is the best I know for filesystems >= 2 TB and in case you need
> f
thank you very much. what do you think abou jfs??
is it comparable with others??
———
Ashkan R
On Aug 5, 2012 12:02 AM, "Joerg Schilling" <
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> > On 08/04/2012 05:06 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Using BTRFS now is like using
On 08/04/12 7:01 AM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> hello
> i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided.
> i want to share it on network via nfs.
> which file system is better for it?
>
we are using XFS with CentOS 6.latest on 80TB file systems, works quite
well. handles a mix of many tiny files and very
On 08/04/12 12:48 PM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> thank you very much. what do you think abou jfs??
> is it comparable with others??
it works very well on IBM AIX, but I see very little support or usage
from the Linux community.
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz
hello list,
I'm trying to write a script that will search through a directory of trace
logs for an oracle database. From what I understand new files are always
being created in the directory and it's not possible to know the exact
names of the files before they are created. The purpose of this is
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:19:39PM -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> hello list,
>
> I'm trying to write a script that will search through a directory of trace
> logs for an oracle database. From what I understand new files are always
> being created in the directory and it's not possible to know the ex
One disadvantage I've seen with XFS is that you cannot shrink [0] the
file system.
For a box dedicated to network storage this shouldn't be a problem.
But in my instance I made /var a bit too large and needed to reclaim
space for /.
[0] http://xfs.org/index.php/Shrinking_Support
---~~.~~---
Mike
On 2012-08-04, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> As Nux! initially said, ext4 is the OS that RHEL and Fedora support as
> their main file system. I would (and do) use that. The 6.3 kernel does
> support xfs and CentOS has the jfs tools in our extras directory, but I
> like tried and true over experimenta
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> What is the age of BTRFS?
BTRFS presentation, mid-2007
https://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/dist/documentation/btrfs-ukuug.pdf
That makes it 6 years in development. Next...
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth beco
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> So be careful with BTRFS until it was in wide use for at least 4 years.
FUD alert...
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan/bo
---
LinuxCon Japan 2012 | Presentations
On The Way to a Healthy Btrfs Towards Enterprise
Bt
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:48 PM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> thank you very much. what do you think abou jfs??
> is it comparable with others??
I was very pro-JFS... until I lost 10gig of very important data, and
back then (2002) there was no way to recover a JFS volume (the data
was in RAID, but so
On 08/04/12 8:26 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Dunno if IBM did much to JFS after that... haven´t been following
> their work wrt JFS...
JFS is the primary file system for AIX on their big Power servers, and
on those, it performs very very well. the utilities are are fully
integrated so growing
On 8/3/12, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 11:52 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> I'll probably have to slowly hunt down the relevant selinux context
>> one by one when nobody's screaming about the server being down.
>
> Would restorecon not help get this bootrapped ? and then with selinux i
On 03/08/12 17:05, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> As per http://www.williambrownstreet.net/blog/?p=387, add the
> following kernel arguments to the GRUB boot configuration:
>
> pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1
> i915.i915_enable_fbc=1
>
> As measured using PowerTop, this made
On 8/3/12, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, August 03, 2012 06:24:46 AM Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>> In a moment of epic stupidity, having ran out of space on the root
>> partition of a server due to /var chewing up the space, I added a
>> separate drive for the purpose of mounting it as /var
> ...
On 8/3/12, John R Pierce wrote:
> if you had any database servers like postgresql or mysql, and their data
> files were in the default locations under /var, your databases are
> undoubtably corrupted, unless you stopped the DB server(s) before doing
> this copy.
I think the fortunate thing is tha
Everyone,
I have an need to be able to print to an HP1320 that is usb connected to
a Fedora 17 desktop on a remote network from a Centos 5.8 cups print
server on an internal network. The desktop is in a remote network that
belongs to to a different client than the one owning the cups print
server
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 11:30:48PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I have an need to be able to print to an HP1320 that is usb connected to
> a Fedora 17 desktop on a remote network from a Centos 5.8 cups print
> server on an internal network. The desktop is in a remote network tha
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 11:30:48PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I have an need to be able to print to an HP1320 that is usb connected to
> a Fedora 17 desktop on a remote network from a Centos 5.8 cups print
> server on an internal network. The desktop is in a remote network tha
34 matches
Mail list logo
