On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
>>>
>>> The iptables rules
How do I set up a subversion repository so
that svn can use an svnserve running locally?
I own the repository.
svnserve -d -r ... runs as me.
svn mkdir -m 'make trunk' svn://localhost/redeye/trunk
fails with
svn: Authorization failed
There is no request for credentials.
Is anyone that can willing
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 14:18 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> My server is able to synchronize with GPSNTP so rules
> are fine for that (because my output chain is ACCEPT per default).
And related traffic is allowed too, yes, I overlooked that.
Are you sure your windows clients have addresses in th
Check for IP conflicts. Maybe someone else has your IP address.
On 9/2/12 11:40 PM, Mail List wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Just found an issue with CentOS 6.3. The network is getting inaccessible at
> times. The server has been installed with CentOS 6 and then package upgrade
> was performed.
>
> =
>
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" ntp ser
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>> Any idea what is wrong?
>
> The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
> network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not specify
> any
On 03/09/2012 13:00, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" n
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> > Any idea what is wrong?
>
> The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
> network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not speci
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not specify
any rules for eth1 to allow that ntp server to synchronise with the
remote se
On 2.9.2012 18:22, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Markus Falb
> wrote:
>> On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
>>> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on.
...
>>> The script for making f
Am 31.08.2012 16:58, schrieb Tom Grace:
> On 31/08/12 15:34, Rainer Traut wrote:
>> Am 31.08.2012 16:19, schrieb Tom Grace:
>>> If the clock is wrong by (if I remember correctly) about 30 mins it will
>>> take so long to drift back to being correct that NTPd gives up.
>>
>> Hmm, no it still does ti
12 matches
Mail list logo
