Re: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready?

2012-09-04 Thread Bob Hepple
David C. Miller writes: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "John Doe" > > To: "Cent O Smailinglist" > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:14:29 AM > > Subject: [CentOS] Is glusterfs ready? > > > > Hey, > > > > since RH took control of glusterfs, I've been looking to convert our > >

[CentOS] Mail Send and Receive Problem

2012-09-04 Thread jiten jha
Dear Friends , I have postfix mail server it is in running condition. But suddenly it is giving me error *Unknown user or password incorrect. * when I check log it is showing me *"Sep 5 10:26:51 student dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168

Re: [CentOS] rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma

2012-09-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:47:06 -0400 Michel Donais wrote: > I can't find a place to get rpmlibs(PayloadIsLzma) Having never heard of your yajhfc program before, three minutes of Google searching has told me the following: rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) appears to be a Suse-ism. So your rpm is for Suse Li

[CentOS] Postfix login Name Error

2012-09-04 Thread jiten jha
Dear Friends, I have done basic postfix mail server configuration but problem is when I try to login then it is not taking my name . it is taking full name with domain name. My domain name is *"studen.ac.in"* My user name is jiten when I try to login with my name in a log it is showing *" Sep 5 1

[CentOS] rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma

2012-09-04 Thread Michel Donais
I'm too settig up Hylafax and found ajhfc to be more user friendly than all the other cited fax frontend in the Hylafax repository. Hylafax-Server 6.0.5-1rhel5.i386.rpm Hylafax-Client-6.0.5-1rhel5.i386.rpm Centos 5.8 I downloaded and tried to install but failed yajhfc-0.5.2-1.noarch.rp

Re: [CentOS] Recover software raid 10 on CentOS 6.3

2012-09-04 Thread Jacob Hydeman
It's been fixed. The drives were ok but nothing would reassemble. The drives were marked as faulty so I followed the suggestions here: http://anders.com/cms/411/Linux/Software.RAID/inactive/mdadm Thanks! On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Jacob Hydeman wrote: > The setup is 4 1TB drives running R

[CentOS] 802.3ad + Centos 6 + KVM (bridging)

2012-09-04 Thread aurfalien
Hi all, Does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup? Of course we are also bridging here. - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 04.09.2012 um 20:34 schrieb James B. Byrne: > We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router. > Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address > 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases. > > # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none > BROADCAS

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:00 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > >> That should happen directly without C's involvement if the netmask is >> 255.255.0.0 on A and B's eth1 interfaces. > > It is not. The netmask on those interfaces is 255.255.255.0. Netmasks apply to (and describe) connected subnets, not i

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread Cliff Pratt
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:00 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Tue, September 4, 2012 16:51, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> That should happen directly without C's involvement if the netmask is >> 255.255.0.0 on A and B's eth1 interfaces. > > It is not. The netmask on those interfaces is 255.255.255.0.

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/04/12 2:00 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > I am experimenting to see if this arrangement is workable. I want to > know if it is possible to have two separate 192.168.x subnets on the > same network. Why? I do not have a purpose in mind. I am just > checking out whether it can work or not. > >

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread James B. Byrne
On Tue, September 4, 2012 16:51, Les Mikesell wrote: > > That should happen directly without C's involvement if the netmask is > 255.255.0.0 on A and B's eth1 interfaces. It is not. The netmask on those interfaces is 255.255.255.0. > >> Instead it goes to Eth0 on C where it dies as one would >>

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread James B. Byrne
per: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr Tue Sep 4 16:42:57 EDT 2012 > could you show the result of the route command on host C? [root@gway01 ~]# ip route 216.185.64.52/30 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 216.185.64.54 10.0.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 10

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/04/12 1:25 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > I have host A with eth0[aaa.bbb.ccc.A] and eth1[192.168.216.A] > > I have host B with eth0[aaa.bbb.ccc.B] and eth1[192.168.209.B] what are the subnet masks defined on 192.168.216.A and 192.168.209.B ? > and I have host C as the gateway with eth0 being

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:25 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and >> 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these >> circumstances. > > um, those are both the same? I as

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
James B. Byrne wrote: > > On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and >> 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these >> circumstances. > > um, those are both the same? I assume you meant one of them to be

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread James B. Byrne
On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and > 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these > circumstances. um, those are both the same? I assume you meant one of them to be different? You are correct. I

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/04/12 12:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > There are presently two subnets on the lan, 192.168.209.0 and > 192.168.209.0. I believe that the present netmask is correct in these > circumstances. um, those are both the same? I assume you meant one of them to be different? when you say therre

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:18 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > On Tue, September 4, 2012 14:34, James B. Byrne wrote: >> We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router. >> Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address >> 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases. >> > > per:

[CentOS] Recover software raid 10 on CentOS 6.3

2012-09-04 Thread Jacob Hydeman
The setup is 4 1TB drives running RAID10. I was using the Gnome Disk Utility to verify the integrity of the array (which is a 500MB mirrored md0 and the rest a R10 md1). I believe one of the drives is bad but prior to the system going offline it showed that 2 drives were detached from the array bu

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread James B. Byrne
On Tue, September 4, 2012 14:34, James B. Byrne wrote: > We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router. > Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address > 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases. > per: Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com Tue Sep 4 15:01:18 EDT 2012

Re: [CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:34 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router. > Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address > 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases. > > # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none >> D

Re: [CentOS] Advice on partitioning a Dell MD1200 disk array

2012-09-04 Thread Tony Molloy
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 19:25:05 Nate Duehr wrote: > On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > Just remember I'm due to retire at the end of this month so this > > will be my last big job for the Dept. And due to financial > > constraints I will not be replaced. So I will be handing

[CentOS] Simple routing question

2012-09-04 Thread James B. Byrne
We use a dual homed CentOS-6.3 host for our Internet gateway router. Its internal nic (eth1) is configured such that the address 192.168.0.1 is one of its aliases. # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1:192BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=192.168.255.255 DEVICE=eth1:192 IPADDR=192.168.0.1 IPV6IN

Re: [CentOS] Advice on partitioning a Dell MD1200 disk array

2012-09-04 Thread Nate Duehr
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: > Just remember I'm due to retire at the end of this month so this will > be my last big job for the Dept. And due to financial constraints I > will not be replaced. So I will be handing this machine over to a co- > worker who is basically a Windo

Re: [CentOS] Advice on partitioning a Dell MD1200 disk array

2012-09-04 Thread Tony Molloy
On Tuesday 04 September 2012 12:44:26 Götz Reinicke wrote: > Hi Tony, > > because I suggest just something very general I post off list :) > > From my POV as I'm currently facing similar setups with different > hardware rolling back from fine granular setups to simple 'bigger' > less complex con

Re: [CentOS] Gradually adjust NTP sync over time?

2012-09-04 Thread Sean Carolan
> What I'm trying to avoid is abruptly resetting the clock from 12:06 to > 12:05 all at once. Instead we want to slowly turn the clock back that > one minute, but spread the changes across several hours or days. I think the "-x" option may be our solution; I R'd the FM and it says: "...If the -x

Re: [CentOS] Gradually adjust NTP sync over time?

2012-09-04 Thread Sean Carolan
> This is already how ntpd works. When you first start the service > (usually upon reboot), it will use 'ntpdate' to do a hard set of the > clock, then ntpd picks up and adjusts the clock back and forth to keep > it correct. My understanding was that ntpd will use "slewing" for adjustments of les

Re: [CentOS] Gradually adjust NTP sync over time?

2012-09-04 Thread Brian Mathis
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Sean Carolan wrote: > Suppose you have server A and server B. Server B is running 60 > seconds too fast, while server A is accurate. Is there a way to > gradually move server B's time back into sync with server A, without > making a drastic, immediate change to t

[CentOS] Gradually adjust NTP sync over time?

2012-09-04 Thread Sean Carolan
Suppose you have server A and server B. Server B is running 60 seconds too fast, while server A is accurate. Is there a way to gradually move server B's time back into sync with server A, without making a drastic, immediate change to the clock? In other words, we would like to 'smear' the differ

Re: [CentOS] lscfg and vpdupdate om CentOS-6

2012-09-04 Thread John Doe
From: James B. Byrne > Are these packages still available for RHEL6/CentOS6? RH only or just missing? You can grab the source maybe: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/lsvpd-1.6.7-3.el6.src.rpm JD ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] svn: Authorization failed

2012-09-04 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, John Doe wrote: > From: Michael Hennebry > >> How do I set up a subversion repository so >> that svn can use an svnserve running locally? >> I own the repository. >> svnserve -d -r ... runs as me. >> svn mkdir -m 'make trunk' svn://localhost/redeye/trunk >> fails with >> svn:

[CentOS] lscfg and vpdupdate om CentOS-6

2012-09-04 Thread James B. Byrne
Are these packages still available for RHEL6/CentOS6? If so then where does one get them? If not then have they been replaced with something else? There does not seem to be a listing for them at epel. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemail

Re: [CentOS] Advice on partitioning a Dell MD1200 disk array

2012-09-04 Thread Paul Tader
> > The second MD1200 will be used to backup the first, using BackupPC and > for other storage purposes. > > As I won't know the storage requirements for the "backup partition" > and they will probably change over time anyway. I was thinking of > using LVM for it. So how to partition the MD1200 for

Re: [CentOS] Advice on partitioning a Dell MD1200 disk array

2012-09-04 Thread Blake Hudson
Tony Molloy wrote the following on 9/4/2012 6:10 AM: > Hi, > > I've just got possession of a Dell PE R720 with 2 MD1200 disk > enclosures. > > Both MD1200 are fully populated with 12 x 3 TB disks > > The system will basically be a student file-server running CentOS 6.x > serving various size files

Re: [CentOS] suggestion for filesystem or general performance optimization

2012-09-04 Thread Theo Band
On 09/04/2012 09:06 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: > Hi, > > recently I noticed, that we have some performance issues regarding our > central samba fileserver. Red Hat EL 5.8, samba3x-3.5.10-0.109. > > Doing a rsync, scp or accessing a share from a client and copy large > files (e.g. 3 GB ISO), I do get

Re: [CentOS] Advice on partitioning a Dell MD1200 disk array

2012-09-04 Thread Götz Reinicke
Hi Tony, because I suggest just something very general I post off list :) From my POV as I'm currently facing similar setups with different hardware rolling back from fine granular setups to simple 'bigger' less complex configurations. (we do have 6 iscsi storages from 2TB (sun ZFS) up to 32 TB)

[CentOS] Advice on partitioning a Dell MD1200 disk array

2012-09-04 Thread Tony Molloy
Hi, I've just got possession of a Dell PE R720 with 2 MD1200 disk enclosures. Both MD1200 are fully populated with 12 x 3 TB disks The system will basically be a student file-server running CentOS 6.x serving various size files from small c programs to multi gigabyte audio and video files o

Re: [CentOS] NTP server problem behind firewall

2012-09-04 Thread Artifex Maximus
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote: >> >> >> The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but >> second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a >> 'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump

Re: [CentOS] svn: Authorization failed

2012-09-04 Thread John Doe
From: Michael Hennebry > How do I set up a subversion repository so > that svn can use an svnserve running locally? > I own the repository. > svnserve -d -r ... runs as me. > svn mkdir -m 'make trunk' svn://localhost/redeye/trunk > fails with > svn: Authorization failed > There is no request for

Re: [CentOS] NTP server problem behind firewall

2012-09-04 Thread Giles Coochey
On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote: The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a 'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump says there was traffic and sync happened later so rule is OK I think.

Re: [CentOS] yum repository for development series explicitly

2012-09-04 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Jiten, On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 12:37 +0530, jiten jha wrote: > yum install --enablerepo=milter-manager-development -y milter-manager You should probably inform the owner of that particular repository about your issues. As this is an external repo there is nothing the CentOS crew can do to hel

[CentOS] yum repository for development series explicitly

2012-09-04 Thread jiten jha
Dear Friends, When I am running this command yum install --enablerepo=milter-manager-development -y milter-manager * So I am getting this error Message . * milter-manager/primary | 7.0 kB 00:01 milter-manager 40/40 http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/milte

[CentOS] suggestion for filesystem or general performance optimization

2012-09-04 Thread Götz Reinicke
Hi, recently I noticed, that we have some performance issues regarding our central samba fileserver. Red Hat EL 5.8, samba3x-3.5.10-0.109. Doing a rsync, scp or accessing a share from a client and copy large files (e.g. 3 GB ISO), I do get a read / write average about 60 to 90 MB/sec. So LAN and