On 09/27/2012 01:58 AM, muiz wrote:
> 1. Gateway (FC6)
>1.1) eth0: lan static IP: 192.168.1.20
>1.2) eth1: external public static IP: 113.89.142.80
>2.3) Shorewall-3.2.8 is running
This is extremely old, and you are allowing access to SSH and DNS
services on the firewall itself.
On 09/27/2012 09:34 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> That's an interesting difference on its own, since the underlying
> files are about 95M and 54M respectively. Does the 32 bit kernel use
> some tricks to sparsely map files where the 64 bit one does it
> directly with page tables?
No, it's because gli
On Saturday, September 29, 2012 11:56:04 AM John R Pierce wrote:
> On 09/29/12 5:19 AM, Ilyas -- wrote:
> > Backend storage is 2 SATA directly attached disks. No any caches on
> > SATA controller.
> > Both disks run in mdraid mirror.
> >
> > Zeroed files have written many days (some files was writt
Sorry a typo, I have
max_connections = 100
in postgresql.conf (I was advised not to change that number).
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dear CentOS users,
I run a small Facebook game at a CentOS 6.3 machine
with PostgreSQL 8.4.3 + few PHP scripts + 1 Perl daemon
and even though the server worked ok,
I've suggested my users to double up the RAM
to 32 GB and they have collected money for that.
Now my problem is that I don't know, w
On 09/29/12 5:19 AM, Ilyas -- wrote:
> Backend storage is 2 SATA directly attached disks. No any caches on
> SATA controller.
> Both disks run in mdraid mirror.
>
> Zeroed files have written many days (some files was written and closed
> 2 weeks ago) ago before power fail.
How do 2 sata disks in a
XFS + battery backed RAID controller is not way to protect your data.
Very easy way to understand it is run server farm with 1000+ nodes.
This is enough quantity of servers for make representative sample.
There are problems:
1. bugs in RAID controllers (problems with BBU, cache memory,
hardware,
On Friday, September 28, 2012 04:29:55 PM Keith Keller wrote:
> No filesystem can fully protect against power failures--that's not its
> job. That's why higher-end RAID controllers have battery backups, and
> why important servers should be on a UPS. If you are really paranoid,
> you can probably
Backend storage is 2 SATA directly attached disks. No any caches on
SATA controller.
Both disks run in mdraid mirror.
Zeroed files have written many days (some files was written and closed
2 weeks ago) ago before power fail.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:19 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 09/28/12 12
On 29 September 2012 10:45, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear All
> My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with
> #fsck -fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of
> the installed applications is preventing it from booting up (as can be seen
> in
Dear All
My server got inconsistency from sudden power cut that I fixed it with #fsck
-fvy /dev/hda at the maintenance prompt . But after reboot, one of the
installed applications is preventing it from booting up (as can be seen in the
boot up process list). Can you please let me know how can
11 matches
Mail list logo