According to xorg.0.log, it's seeing the EDID fine. All the info was there.
mw
--
"Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rises up and smites thee."
-- William Kershner
http://crucis-court.com
http://www.crucis.net/1632search
On 10/09/2012 04:25 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Messa
I'll try that and let you know.
mw
--
"Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rises up and smites thee."
-- William Kershner
http://crucis-court.com
http://www.crucis.net/1632search
On 10/08/2012 05:15 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:51:17 -0500
> Mike Watson wrote:
>
>> Login
On 10/01/2012 08:58 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> Ever since we brought some of our servers up to 6.x, where the gspca
> module comes with the kernel, instead of us building it, we've been
> seeing problems. One system gives very strange loops - someone walks
> through, then repe
On 10/03/2012 01:17 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 02.10.2012 23:29, Frank Cox wrote:
>> My cell phone provider just sent me a letter stating that my 3 year
>> contract is
>> up and they will give me a Samsung Galaxy 3 if I will sign a new
>> contract.
>>
>> I'm wondering how well (or if) that phone will wor
On 09/27/2012 05:24 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 06:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> I was trying to figure out what criteria to use to mark the connection.
>> FTP is such a
>> braindead application, using to channels and active and passive mode.
>> What really
>> needs to happen is somewa
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
> I would suspect the inode64 option is the problem
>
> We had similar issues running 32 bit apps on a 64 bit clients accessing
> 'large' NFS servers (non-Linux NFS servers) - the 'fix' was to make sure
> the file systems were exported/mounted with 32 bit inode compatibility
http://xfs.org/
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> We're experiencing problems with some legacy software when it comes to NFS
> access. Even though files are visible in a terminal and can be accessed with
> standard shell tools and vi, this software typically complains that the files
> are empty or not sy
Mogens Kjaer writes:
> On 10/09/2012 02:16 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > The clients exhibiting the problem are running CentOS 5.4 and CentOS 5.8
> > x84_64.
>
> Which NFS protocol version?
>
> Have you tried NFS mount with vers=3 ?
From /proc:
nfs
rw,vers=3,rsize=1048576,
On 10/09/2012 02:16 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> The clients exhibiting the problem are running CentOS 5.4 and CentOS 5.8
> x84_64.
Which NFS protocol version?
Have you tried NFS mount with vers=3 ?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
__
We're experiencing problems with some legacy software when it comes to NFS
access. Even though files are visible in a terminal and can be accessed with
standard shell tools and vi, this software typically complains that the files
are empty or not syntactically correct.
The NFS filesystems in
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Lamar Owen
> Sent: den 8 oktober 2012 20:57
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] X/Display resolution configuration
>
> Double check your cable. I ran into a widescreen si
12 matches
Mail list logo
