Couldn't get this to work so had to disable it.
On 26 December 2012 19:47, Gavin Henry wrote:
> First things first... Can you confirm that those are still the values in
>> place?
>>
>> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/arp_filter
>> cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/arp_ignore
>> cat /proc/sys/net
I've discovered recently that something on my Centos 5.8 box (up to date)
is hogging a ton of RAM.
so a little while ago I sat and watched top for a while. it showed
(sorry, I didn't take screen shots or write this down, so the numbers
are a bit rough) that out of 8 gigs of swap, around 2 1/2 was
On 01/04/2013 04:11 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
>> On 01/04/2013 03:03 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 03:03 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
>>> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
>>> CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attac
On 01/04/2013 03:03 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
>> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
>> CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
>> iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
> CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
> iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this doesn't
> seem to be quite wor
Tim Evans wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
>> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
>> CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
>> iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this
>> doesn't seem to
Sorry, Digimer, I sent the reply to you and not the list.
At any rate, I've found part of my problem. Seems I added the IP as a
resource, and then tried to add that resource to the service groups. For
some reason, that didn't work, but just adding the IP to the service
group does fine.
Now to
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Nux! wrote:
>>> what is in 6.3. But I need to resist going with source building, as
>> then I have to spend more time than I have staying up with fixes. I
>> want an RPM repo to fit into the YUM process.
>
>> BTW, I have started this effort following:
>>
>>
>> h
On 04.01.2013 17:12, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have been looking at the same issue WRT Postfix. There the
> differences are probably greater between what is available in source
> and
> what is in 6.3. But I need to resist going with source building, as
> then I have to spend more time than I h
On 01/04/2013 12:13 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a small cluster using the High Availability and
> High Availability Management groups. I'd like to run this on 3 different
> machines, one being a "management" machine and the other two being the
> actual cluster. It doesn't se
- Original Message -
|
| On 1/4/2013 12:21 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
| > On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
| >> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a
| >> brand new
| >> CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the
| >> attached
| >> iptables scr
On 1/4/2013 12:21 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
> On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
>> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
>> CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
>> iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
> CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
> iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this
> doesn't seem to be quite working on th
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand
> new CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the
> attached iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems,
> but this doesn't seem to be quite working o
On 01/04/2013 11:53 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
>>
>> there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
>> 6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
>>
>> Is this the 'correct' th
I'm trying to set up a small cluster using the High Availability and
High Availability Management groups. I'd like to run this on 3 different
machines, one being a "management" machine and the other two being the
actual cluster. It doesn't seem to want to cooperate. I can set the
cluster nodes
Why not try reconfiguring using /usr/bin/system-config-firewall-tui
instead of a manually created configuration.
Mike
On 01/04/2013 12:01 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
> I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand
> new CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used t
I'm replacing an ancient Solaris 'ipf' firewall/router with a brand new
CentOS 6.3 system. In the olden days, I successfully used the attached
iptables script (as /etc/rc.local) on Red Hat 5.x systems, but this
doesn't seem to be quite working on the new system.
Specifically, while it seems t
On 04/01/13 15:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
>
> there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
> 6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
>
> Is this the 'correct' thing to do on a Centos-based mail server?
>
>
There
I just noticed an interesting behaviour of rup on CentOS5/6: run without any
host args, it never prints results for CentOS6 machines. However, if a CentOS6
machine is queried directly, there is a result. It doesnt't matter whether the
querying host runs CentOS5 or CentOS6.
# rup |grep centos6host
In http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd
there is a recommendation to NOT use the version that comes with Centos
6.3, but to get the more current version from RPMForge.
Is this the 'correct' thing to do on a Centos-based mail server?
___
CentOS maili
22 matches
Mail list logo
