On 01/13/2013 07:44 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Any ideas why KVM didn't work?
No, like I said, I didn't spend much time on it. I mostly use them as
routers, where KVM isn't a requirement.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 10:15 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> > And it looks like their Atom E6xx CPU [0] supports Intel VT-x.
> > [0]
> http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/embedded/hwsw/hardware/atom-e6xx/overview
>
> Before you get too excited, the board's firm
I am getting the "you do not have enough RAM to install CentOS on this machine."
error. I could mannually kludge this system online, but I would prefer not to.
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-
On 01/13/2013 05:10 AM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
> Hmm. I find it odd that you're saying something doesn't work when I've
> seen it work. Don't forget shred is loaded into memory and that echo is
> an internal command and hence stored in memory. The final command turns
> off the system, effectively
On 01/13/2013 04:11 AM, Ilyas -- wrote:
> Where my mistake?
Good question. I don't see "{ read }" in your early AVC list, so it's
possible that you hadn't yet run through all of the standard operations
for smartd when you generated the policy. However, "{ getattr }"
appears both before and af
On 01/13/2013 02:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> There is no common
>> >mechanism for making files and databases consistent and making a
>> >snapshot for backups. Admins must do this on their own. If you aren't
>> >actively taking steps to make your backups consistent, they aren't.
> open-vm-tools
On 01/13/2013 10:15 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> And it looks like their Atom E6xx CPU [0] supports Intel VT-x.
> [0] http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/embedded/hwsw/hardware/atom-e6xx/overview
Before you get too excited, the board's firmware is comBIOS, which is a
Soekris-specific firmware that is desig
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 06:55 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> > I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for
> use
> > as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
>
> I use the Soekris 6501 fairly extensive
Hi,
We are looking for some guidance in installing an upgraded
Python on our cluster. Our cluster was installed with Rocks 6.0,
is running CentOs 6.2, and has python-2.6.6, gcc-4.4.6. We
would like to install an upgraded version of Python along with
the following modules
NumPy
Scipy (which w
On 01/12/2013 07:03 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 02:36 PM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
>> 1) connect using ssh and stop all services
>> 2) swapoff /dev/sdXX
>> 3) shred -n5 -z -v /dev/sdX
>
> I assume that all of the disks are to be shredded. Shredding non-system
> disks wouldn't be d
Mode set to permissive:
[r...@srv-1.home ~]# cat /tmp/1.log | grep type=AVC
type=AVC msg=audit(1358078455.215:9598): avc: denied { getattr } for
pid=2521 comm="smartd" path="/dev/sdc" dev=devtmpfs ino=6327
scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:fsdaemon_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:svirt_image_t:s0:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> To debug the clock applet, first you'd have to kill it, and then start
> it under valgrind:
> valgrind -v --log-file=/var/tmp/clock-applet.log clock-applet
you probably want to add --leak-check=full
___
CentOS mailing list
C
On 01/11/2013 02:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> A hard link isn't easy: it's an inode that is referenced by more than one
> other inode.
Don't make it complicated. All regular files are hard links to an
inode. The inode contains information about the owner, group,
permissions, and modificati
On 01/11/2013 01:47 PM, ken wrote:
> Cool. Thanks for mentioning time-stamps. I've been assuming that rsync
> would maintain the source files' original permissions and timestamps.
It will if you specify -t/--times and -p/--perms (or -a, which implies
both).
> It's good to hear too that I can c
On 01/11/2013 01:37 PM, ken wrote:
>From what I've read, rsync will work in the background and just fine
> while users (and several system processes) are copying, deleting,
> editing and other things which would confuse tar.
No, it doesn't. rsync does not have any magic powder for making or
15 matches
Mail list logo
