[CentOS] 5.9 logwatch yum filter broken

After the upgrade to CentOS 5.9, all my CentOS 5 installations report only "Unmatched Entries" in the "yum" section of their daily logwatch mails. It seems the filter script /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/yum got broken: 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail logs?

Am 15.01.2013 22:12, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: > > On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we run >> Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation. > > You said 'stock install'. Selecting a non-default pack

Re: [CentOS] cr repo and firewalling

Am 15.01.2013 21:58, schrieb Markus Falb: > I would like to install the packages from > the continuous release repo and the yum config for this repo says > > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cr/$basearch/ > > well, I definitely do not want to allow worldwide outgoing http so I

Re: [CentOS] evaluating backup systems: rsync

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 12:29:48 PM -0500, ken wrote: > Considering using rsync on a couple systems for backup, I was > wondering if it's possible, and if so how difficult is it... sorry to step in so late, but I have another question on this very topic. I have noticed that if I just _change_ the n

Re: [CentOS] "Red Hat Storage" on CentOS?

On 18.01.2013 07:45, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if "Red Hat Store" will be available in CentOS? > > Have a look here: http://www.redhat.com/products/storage-server/ > > I'm not referring to the "Red Hat Cluster Suite" which is already > available. It is: http://repos.fedorapeopl

Re: [CentOS] evaluating backup systems: rsync

rsync -v -d root@192.168.200.10:/var/lib/ . Use rsync -d option to synchronize only directory tree from source to the destination. The below example, synchronize only directory tree in recursive manner, not the files in the directories -- With Thanks & Regards, Keshaba Mahapatra Technical C

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3: load average strangeness

Il giorno gio, 17/01/2013 alle 13.09 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn ha scritto: > Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905 > > Regards, > Dennis Ok, Then solution, after read this from bug 883905: > Brian Foster 2013-01-08 10:28:08 EST > The current consensus for this bug i

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3: load average strangeness

On 01/18/2013 11:28 AM, thus Dario Lesca spake: > Il giorno gio, 17/01/2013 alle 13.09 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn ha > scritto: >> Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905 >> >> Regards, Dennis > > Ok, Then solution, after read this from bug 883905: > >> Brian Foster 2013-0

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.3: load average strangeness

Il giorno ven, 18/01/2013 alle 11.33 +0100, Timo Schoeler ha scritto: > Ignoring it, because it doesn't hurt? Ignoring the load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 because is only a errata display of load average and the real average is "0,03, 0,03, 0,00"? -- Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it (Inviato da

Re: [CentOS] 5.9 logwatch yum filter broken

On 18.01.2013 09:49, /me wrote: > Looking at the script I find the line > > 22$ThisLine =~ s/^[^ ]* [^ ]* //; > > which looks like its intention was to strip the timestamp from > the logfile entry, but the DEBUG output shows it has already > been stripped at this point. Correction: What

Re: [CentOS] evaluating backup systems: rsync

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:59 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 12:29:48 PM -0500, ken wrote: > > > Considering using rsync on a couple systems for backup, I was > > wondering if it's possible, and if so how difficult is it... > > sorry to step in so late, but I have another question o

Re: [CentOS] evaluating backup systems: rsync

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:25 AM, keshab mahapatra wrote: > rsync -v -d root@192.168.200.10:/var/lib/ . > > Use rsync -d option to synchronize only directory tree from source to > the destination. The below example, synchronize only directory tree in > recursive manner, not the files in the directo

Re: [CentOS] new errors in /var/log/messages since update to 5.9

From: fred smith > since updating to 5.9 a little while ago I find a load of these in > /var/log/messages, which I've not seen before: > Jan 17 22:17:18 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid > argument > ... > Is ntp busted in 5.9? Dunno, but I upgraded to 5.9, rebooted a

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail logs?

> Am 15.01.2013 22:12, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> >> On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >>> Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we >>> run >>> Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation. >> >> You said 'stock install'. Selecting a non-de

[CentOS] sogo

Has anybody some experience with Sogo? http://www.sogo.nu/ -- Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.525 Interleuvenlaan 86, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUM Fax +32 16 397.552 *** * I think I've go

Re: [CentOS] new errors in /var/log/messages since update to 5.9

On 01/17/2013 11:02 PM, fred smith wrote: > since updating to 5.9 a little while ago I find a load of these in > /var/log/messages, which I've not seen before: > > Jan 17 22:17:18 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): Invalid > argument > Jan 17 22:17:20 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(1

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail logs?

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >> >> On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >>> Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we run >>> Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation. >> >> You said 'stock install'. Selecting a non

Re: [CentOS] sogo

Yes I have done the installation but for some strange reason it was not working. Some flaw in documentation, that was not very clear. Hope you will have some better luck while trying it. Inform me if it works for you. On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Paul Bijnens wrote: > > Has anybody some expe

Re: [CentOS] new errors in /var/log/messages since update to 5.9

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:15:02AM -0800, John Doe wrote: > From: fred smith > > > since updating to 5.9 a little while ago I find a load of these in > > /var/log/messages, which I've not seen before: > > Jan 17 22:17:18 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (fd=22): > > Invalid > > argum

Re: [CentOS] new errors in /var/log/messages since update to 5.9

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:06:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/17/2013 11:02 PM, fred smith wrote: > > since updating to 5.9 a little while ago I find a load of these in > > /var/log/messages, which I've not seen before: > > > > Jan 17 22:17:18 fcshome ntpd[4680]: sendto(216.230.228.211) (f

[CentOS] Smartd Warning in logwatch report

I updated the machine that I use for a web/email server last night to 5.9, and I have this in the logwatch report this morning: QUOTE: - Smartd Begin Warnings: Device: /dev/sda [SAT], WARNING: There are known problems with these drives, -

[CentOS] openscad available?

Does anyone know if there is a repo that has openscad for CentOS? rpmfind.net doesn't turn up anything. The openscad wiki page says, "As of 2013, prebuilt OpenSCAD packages are available on many recent Linux and BSD distributions, including Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, and NetBSD. Check your

[CentOS] t-bird annoyance

Anyone got any clues? I'm running 6.3, t-bird 10.0.12, and KDE. I get emails with .docx attachment, and t-bird has no idea what to do with them (and doesn't even offer me a choice)."Change your preferences... So I open the source of the email, and at the beginning of the doc I see Content-Type: ap

Re: [CentOS] Smartd Warning in logwatch report

Frank Cox wrote: > I updated the machine that I use for a web/email server last night to 5.9, > and I > have this in the logwatch report this morning: > > QUOTE: > END OF QUOTE > > The referenced webpages give me a 404. remember logwatch doesn't print everything, so if something isn't clear g

Re: [CentOS] cr repo and firewalling

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 15.01.2013 21:58, schrieb Markus Falb: >> I would like to install the packages from >> the continuous release repo and the yum config for this repo says >> >> baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/cr/$basearch/ >> >> well, I

Re: [CentOS] sogo

On 01/18/2013 06:54 AM, Paul Bijnens wrote: > Has anybody some experience with Sogo? I've started a couple of test deployments for evaluation, but no production roll-outs. I'm planning to deploy with Courier and PostgreSQL on the back end, and Thunderbird on the client. If you want Outlook su

Re: [CentOS] new errors in /var/log/messages since update to 5.9

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:39 PM, fred smith wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:06:32AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 01/17/2013 11:02 PM, fred smith wrote: > > > since updating to 5.9 a little while ago I find a load of these in > > > /var/log/messages, which I've not seen before: > > > >

Re: [CentOS] evaluating backup systems: rsync

On 01/18/2013 01:59 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: > even if all the "rsyncing" needed would be something equivalent to "mv > holidays_2013 family_holidays_2013" on the remote server. Is it > possible to tell rsync to behave in that way? No, which is why some people use Mercurial or git to keep data in sy

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail logs?

I didn't say choice was bad. And I'm perfectly ok with the default mailer being anything other than sendmail. However, I do use sendmail, and I did select it during the installation process. My issue is that the sendmail package does not log anything to the two log files mentioned above. it use

Re: [CentOS] evaluating backup systems: rsync

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/18/2013 01:59 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: >> even if all the "rsyncing" needed would be something equivalent to "mv >> holidays_2013 family_holidays_2013" on the remote server. Is it >> possible to tell rsync to behave in that way? > > No,

Re: [CentOS] Smartd Warning in logwatch report

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:42:51 +0100 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > remember logwatch doesn't print everything, so if something isn't clear > go to the logs and read them. It might make a lot more sense. /var/log/messages doesn't appear to tell me any more than the logwatch report, and neither of t

Re: [CentOS] Smartd Warning in logwatch report

Frank Cox wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:42:51 +0100 > Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > >> remember logwatch doesn't print everything, so if something isn't clear >> go to the logs and read them. It might make a lot more sense. > > /var/log/messages doesn't appear to tell me any more than the logwatc

Re: [CentOS] Smartd Warning in logwatch report

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:54:44 -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I did a google search on the drive no, and was struck by the serious > dearth of websites offering it for sale. Then I came across the thread at: > > which may be of some i

Re: [CentOS] Smartd Warning in logwatch report

On 18/01/13 16:40, Frank Cox wrote: > I updated the machine that I use for a web/email server last night to 5.9, > and I > have this in the logwatch report this morning: > > QUOTE: > - Smartd Begin > > > Warnings: > Device: /dev/sda [SAT], WAR

[CentOS] Thank you

Hi guys, Thank you for the release of 5.9. I haven't been following the list much lately, or even realized Red Hat released 5.9 :) Keep up the good work! Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list Cen

[CentOS] Updating gtk2

What does this error mean? Updating : gtk2 35/178 g_module_open() failed for /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: undefined symbol: inflateReset /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-64: /u

Re: [CentOS] Updating gtk2

At Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:55:15 -0600 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > What does this error mean? > > Updating : gtk2 > > 35/178 > g_module_open() failed for > /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: > /usr/local/lib/l

Re: [CentOS] Updating gtk2

>> What does this error mean? >> >> Updating : gtk2 When I try: yum erase gtk2 I get: Removing for dependencies: ecryptfs-utils ecryptfs-utils trousers trousers Don't believe I need any of those? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org ht

[CentOS] Serial console

I am trying to get a CentOS 6.3 serial console to work with IPMI SOL. I think I have everything working but maybe the wrong baud rate on the getty: $ ipmitool -I lanplus -U root -H 10.0.0.14 sol activate Password: [SOL Session operational. Use ~? for help] �� 10.0.0.14 is the DRAC IP add

[CentOS] Large yum update

Hi, On about 8am GMT Jan 18, my server reported an unusually large number of yum updates available. I think this is due to the release of CentOS 5.9: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.announce/7203 However, I just wanted to be a little paranoid, since this is unusual for my normal y