[CentOS-es] Particionar MY PASS 2TB

2013-02-03 Thread Fidel Dominguez
Quisiera saber cual seria la mejor option de particionar mi MY PASS 2TB? Quisiera sus consejos al respecto, si es mejor dejarlo tal y como esta o cambiarle el formato a ext3? O crear dos particiones para su mejor rendimiento? Necesito consejos Saludos Fidel

[CentOS] CentOs 6 DHCP Server and virtual interface

2013-02-03 Thread Grzegorz Sołtys
Hello All I have looking for any specific answer for one thing. I have a virtualized Server with only one physical interface eth0 (WAN). To run OpenVPN i need to use DHCP server. And here is the question: is there a chance to run DHCP server on eth0:0 interface? Or it is impossible ? Thanks

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 6 DHCP Server and virtual interface

2013-02-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/03/2013 06:38 AM, Grzegorz Sołtys wrote: Hello All I have looking for any specific answer for one thing. I have a virtualized Server with only one physical interface eth0 (WAN). To run OpenVPN i need to use DHCP server. And here is the question: is there a chance to run DHCP server

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 6 DHCP Server and virtual interface

2013-02-03 Thread Grzegorz Sołtys
I have made it, and the DHCP server won't start telling me: Feb 3 13:42:21 vlan19 dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth0:0 (no IPv4 addresse s). Feb 3 13:42:21 vlan19 dhcpd: ** Ignoring requests on eth0:0. If this is not what Feb 3 13:42:21 vlan19 dhcpd:you want, please write a subnet

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 6 DHCP Server and virtual interface

2013-02-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/03/2013 07:38 AM, Grzegorz Sołtys wrote: I have made it, and the DHCP server won't start telling me: Feb 3 13:42:21 vlan19 dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth0:0 (no IPv4 addresse s). Feb 3 13:42:21 vlan19 dhcpd: ** Ignoring requests on eth0:0. If this is not what Feb 3 13:42:21

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 6 DHCP Server and virtual interface

2013-02-03 Thread Grzegorz Sołtys
So, if my WAN IP adress is 83.238.*.* then i need to run DHCP server in the same class of if address. But, if got only this address and i will setup in eg: 83.238.55.10 to 15 range for eth0:0 and there is a machine with WAN address like 83.238.55.13 if gonna to make IP address colission? or

[CentOS] Python 3.3 for CentOS-6

2013-02-03 Thread Florian La Roche
Hello, I've built python3-3.3 binary rpms based on the current Fedora packages. Binary rpms are built with koji/mock. Binary rpms are only tested very lightly, but I welcome additional tests or patches as well as additional python3 rpms people want to use:

[CentOS] The moving of VNC port from 580n to 590n

2013-02-03 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On my 'older' systems that include Centos 5.5 and Fedora 12, vncserver is running on ports 580n where n is defined by userid in the /etc/sysconfig/vncserver I just spent a bit of time getting it working on my new Centos 6.3 server and found it listening on ports 590n. When did the change

Re: [CentOS] The moving of VNC port from 580n to 590n

2013-02-03 Thread Cliff Pratt
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: On my 'older' systems that include Centos 5.5 and Fedora 12, vncserver is running on ports 580n where n is defined by userid in the /etc/sysconfig/vncserver I just spent a bit of time getting it working on my new

Re: [CentOS] The moving of VNC port from 580n to 590n

2013-02-03 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
And you can always use iptables to redirect from 580n to 590n .. On 2/3/2013 11:42 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote: There's a lot of conflicting information on this topic on the Internet. Most current VNC servers seem to listen on port 590n. I've seen it claimed that a) port 580n is not used and can be

Re: [CentOS] The moving of VNC port from 580n to 590n

2013-02-03 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/3/2013 1:42 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote: There's a lot of conflicting information on this topic on the Internet. Most current VNC servers seem to listen on port 590n. I've seen it claimed that a) port 580n is not used and can be blocked, b) 580n is used for the Java VNC client, c) 580n is used

Re: [CentOS] The moving of VNC port from 580n to 590n

2013-02-03 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 02/03/2013 04:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 2/3/2013 1:42 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote: There's a lot of conflicting information on this topic on the Internet. Most current VNC servers seem to listen on port 590n. I've seen it claimed that a) port 580n is not used and can be blocked, b) 580n is

[CentOS] Traffic shaping problem

2013-02-03 Thread Bent Terp
Hi all, I tried last week to do traffic shaping on a production system, object of the exercise was simply to throttle the outgoing traffic. tc qdisc add dev eth4 root tbf rate 300mbit burst 300kb latency 50ms But the server became rather instable, crashing repeatedly without anything in the

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Virtual SSL sites with Apache httpd on CentOS 5

2013-02-03 Thread Bent Terp
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Harold Pritchett har...@uga.edu wrote: I know that the upstream provider often provides services added to new releases as updates to the current release. My question is how can I get multiple secure web sites on a single IP address and port? Has the upstream