On 02/11/2013 01:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> I need some new replacement batteries for rack-mount APC UPSes. My old
> vender... well, the salesman I dealt with for several years left about a
> year and a half ago, and last year's purchase was a disaster (wrong
> batteries, wrong
I have a spec file that is doing a binary rpm build. This spec file
works on centos 5 but fails on centos 6 for file not found.
Here is the files section:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
%defverify(not mtime group)
%config /etc/captureProxy.conf
/etc/init.d/captureProxy
/etc/logrotate.d/captureProx
https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby
Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an
old version of gtk2.
If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like
google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was
plan
On 02/11/2013 04:18 AM, Harry Chen wrote:
> Hi there
> Firstly I must claim that this is the first time I using a mailing list and I
> am not familiar with the rules here. As well I am not so good at English too.
> So here's my apologizes if I'm not able to claim the problem clearly.
> I'm now us
AHOI!
I've big trouble by setting up CentOS 6.3 for my new vDSL.
As I've found out, the German Telekom is using VLAN7 for her
internet-(data) connections. => http://workaround.org/blog/vdsl
O.K. what I've done:
The NIC where's my DSL-modem is connectet is eth0.
cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scrip
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
>> >>
>>> We use BatteriesPlus a lot. Prices seem reasonable and our local one
>>> will deliver to us.
>>>
>> That was... odd. I went to their corporate website, then called, and
>> corporate doesn't do gov't contract, but stores migh
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
> >>
>> We use BatteriesPlus a lot. Prices seem reasonable and our local one will
>> deliver to us.
>>
> That was... odd. I went to their corporate website, then called, and
> corporate doesn't do gov't contract, but stores might. I called the store
> near
On 2/11/2013 3:37 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/11/2013 12:13 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> Batteries Plus was reliable, but their prices were going up, so I had to
>> look for a less expensive solution.
> lead acid battery prices have gone up a lot due to the price of lead and
> transportation.
Tr
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> I need some new replacement batteries for rack-mount APC UPSes. My old
> vender... well, the salesman I dealt with for several years left about a
> year and a half ago, and last year's purchase was a disaster (wrong
> batteries, wrong batte
Charles Whitby wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
>>
>> I need some new replacement batteries for rack-mount APC UPSes. My old
>> vender... well, the salesman I dealt with for several years left about a
>> year and a half ago, and last year's purchase was a disaster (wrong
>> batteri
On 2/11/2013 12:13 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Batteries Plus was reliable, but their prices were going up, so I had to
> look for a less expensive solution.
lead acid battery prices have gone up a lot due to the price of lead and
transportation.
--
john r pierce
On 2/11/2013 2:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> I need some new replacement batteries for rack-mount APC UPSes. My old
> vender... well, the salesman I dealt with for several years left about a
> year and a half ago, and last year's purchase was a disaster (wrong
> batteries, wrong b
We use BatteriesPlus a lot. Prices seem reasonable and our local one will
deliver to us.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> I need some new replacement batteries for rack-mount APC UPSes. My old
> vender... well, the salesman I dealt with for several years left about a
>
Hi, folks.
I need some new replacement batteries for rack-mount APC UPSes. My old
vender... well, the salesman I dealt with for several years left about a
year and a half ago, and last year's purchase was a disaster (wrong
batteries, wrong batteries, months to get the shipping to return the wrong
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:59 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>
> But there's bad news for Google Chrome on RHEL 6 ...
> http://www.muktware.com/5203/google-says-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-obsolete
>
Google doesn't understand the concept of code getting past beta test versions.
--
Les Mikesell
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/11/2013 07:09 AM, Bassem Sossan wrote:
> > Hi
> > I've installed CentOs 6 successfully, but, Firefox does't lunch.
> > I've downloaded Chrome and when I try to execute "google-chrome &"
> command,
> > I had command not found.
>
> Chro
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/10/2013 11:59 AM, fred smith wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:11:00PM +, Nux! wrote:
>>> On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3
On 02/11/2013 07:09 AM, Bassem Sossan wrote:
> Hi
> I've installed CentOs 6 successfully, but, Firefox does't lunch.
> I've downloaded Chrome and when I try to execute "google-chrome &" command,
> I had command not found.
Chrome is not part of CentOS at all (it is available and works if
installed
On 02/10/2013 11:59 AM, fred smith wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:11:00PM +, Nux! wrote:
>> On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
>>> I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
>>> previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
>>> When ru
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Bassem Sossan wrote:
> Hi
> I've installed CentOs 6 successfully, but, Firefox does't lunch.
> I've downloaded Chrome and when I try to execute "google-chrome &" command,
> I had command not found.
>
you seem to have a ... divergence between subject and body of th
On 02/11/2013 01:43 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
> Have you configured your BIND installation to answer requests for
> "domain.com"?
>
his 172. does not look like localhost at all... a typo in /etc/hosts ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : h
Have you configured your BIND installation to answer requests for
"domain.com"?
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
"It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever just
stops by to say 'hi' anymore." --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1
> I've followed these commands succes
I've followed these commands successfully :
- yum install bind bind-chroot bind-libs bind-utils
- service named start
When I used " host x.domain.com localhost"
I got :
using domain name server :
name : localhost
address : 172.0.0.1#53
host x.domain.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
I've changed th
On 02/11/2013 12:35 PM, Anumeha Prasad wrote:
> error: bind-libs-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.6.x86_64.rpm: headerRead failed: hdr
> blob(48062): BAD, read returned 515
> error: bind-libs-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.6.x86_64.rpm cannot be installed
>
This could be a big problem potentially: rerun the samw command, bu
Hi
I've installed CentOs 6 successfully, but, Firefox does't lunch.
I've downloaded Chrome and when I try to execute "google-chrome &" command,
I had command not found.
--
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
I'm currently at CentOS 5.8 and am applying the latest OS updates available
for 5.8. I'm seeing following error:
error: bind-libs-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.6.x86_64.rpm: headerRead failed: hdr
blob(48062): BAD, read returned 515
error: bind-libs-9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.6.x86_64.rpm cannot be installed
Sim
From: "m.r...@5-cent.us"
> The entire contents of that incident. I see nothing in messages.
> 2013-02-07 17:38:19 -0500 Power failure.
> 2013-02-07 17:38:21 -0500 Battery power exhausted.
> 2013-02-07 17:38:21 -0500 Initiating system shutdown!
> 2013-02-07 17:38:21 -0500 User logins prohibite
Hi there
Firstly I must claim that this is the first time I using a mailing list and I
am not familiar with the rules here. As well I am not so good at English too.
So here's my apologizes if I'm not able to claim the problem clearly.
I'm now using CentOS 6.3 with kernel 2.6.32-279.19.1.el668.
On 11.02.2013 01:53, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 02/10/2013 07:20 PM, Nux! wrote:
>> I wouldn't worry about it if it doesn't persist; probably a
>> network/mirror hiccup.
>>
>
> So you're thinking that maybe this is related to Software Update then.
Oh, yes, sorry for not being more clear. This is
29 matches
Mail list logo
