On 20/02/13 07:59, Rob Townley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>> # yum install eclipse-\*
>>> # yum remove eclipse-nls htmlparser
>>>
>>> After this, various C++ components and *a lot* of other pieces, too,
>>> were added to the Installed Software list. I very much
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>
>> # yum install eclipse-\*
>> # yum remove eclipse-nls htmlparser
>>
>> After this, various C++ components and *a lot* of other pieces, too,
>> were added to the Installed Software list. I very much doubt that the
>> installation actually a
most recent release of BIND can obtain latest root hints by itself,
and i do not think it connects with (INTERNIC.NET or with) root
servers after a successful authentication of DNSSEC records, so at
initial point (during setup), there is a chance for an entity in the
middle to supply a false one.
b
On 02/19/2013 09:07 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 20.2.2013 02:20, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 2/19/2013 4:35 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
>>> they can do so bit easily if the old one is visible.
>> whats not visible about /var/named/named.ca ? its even listed in
>> /etc/named.conf as the root zone.
> hmm
On 02/19/2013 08:59 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
> ofcourse it is now visible. which is good.
> so removing it would not be good. even if bind has built into it
> older or latest hint.
My point, what I have learned over the past few days, is that having a
hint stub for the roots is an artifact of the ol
On 20.2.2013 02:20, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/19/2013 4:35 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
>> they can do so bit easily if the old one is visible.
>
> whats not visible about /var/named/named.ca ? its even listed in
> /etc/named.conf as the root zone.
hmm, here as I understand this:
A point was made
ofcourse it is now visible. which is good.
so removing it would not be good. even if bind has built into it
older or latest hint.
Received from John R Pierce, on 2013-02-20 1:20 AM:
> On 2/19/2013 4:35 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
>> they can do so bit easily if the old one is visible.
>
> whats not vi
On 2/19/2013 4:35 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
> they can do so bit easily if the old one is visible.
whats not visible about /var/named/named.ca ? its even listed in
/etc/named.conf as the root zone.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the l
>
> # yum install eclipse-\*
> # yum remove eclipse-nls htmlparser
>
> After this, various C++ components and *a lot* of other pieces, too,
> were added to the Installed Software list. I very much doubt that the
> installation actually added all the modules. Instead I suspect that in
> the past, th
sorry, let me re-phrase:
Some users do not want to update their bind with what rhel/centos
repo provides.
Some users update their bind/hint files when centos/rhel repo updates.
so those who want to manually place/use the hint file for their
BIND, they can do so bit easily if the old one is visible
On 2/19/2013 4:22 PM, Bry8 Star wrote:
> So before rhel/centos releases/updates their bind/hint file/bin, or
> users who do not want to update hint/bind portion specifically via
> yum, for such type of users, to use the latest hint file, i think
> the existing hint file & its location would help to
The named.cache / root hints just updated on jan 3 2013 after jun 8
2011.
I'm not 100% sure but i think many centos/rhel boxes are still using
that 2011 hint.
So before rhel/centos releases/updates their bind/hint file/bin, or
users who do not want to update hint/bind portion specifically via
yum,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Bassem Sossan wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Can I use this to configure " ntp.conf " :
>
> server ns1.bos.redhat.com
> server 10.5.26.10
>
If that's an actual host, yes. You refer to NTP time sources via domain
name or IP address.
If you or someone else is running a NTP
On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
>
> Yep, that was it. Thanks for setting me straight.
>
> And apologies for the top-posting reply previously. I pasted the reply and
> just
> wasn't paying attention. My mother raised me better than that.
No problem, was just a hunch... happe
> I'm trying : ' yum -y install krb5-workstation ',
> but I get :
>
> Error Download packages
> no more mirrors to try
>
> And can't find a solution by searching...
Could be your yum cache is hosed up.
Try "yum clean all" and then try again.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
"It's al
I'm trying : ' yum -y install krb5-workstation ',
but I get :
Error Download packages
no more mirrors to try
And can't find a solution by searching...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/19/2013 01:49 PM, Todor Petkov wrote:
> On 19/02/2013 08:39 PM, Bassem Sossan wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> Can I use this to configure " ntp.conf " :
>>
>> server ns1.bos.redhat.com
>> server 10.5.26.10
>>
>> Or we have a replacement for CentOS that we've to use it...
>
> You can use
>
> 0.cent
On 19/02/2013 08:39 PM, Bassem Sossan wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Can I use this to configure " ntp.conf " :
>
> server ns1.bos.redhat.com
> server 10.5.26.10
>
> Or we have a replacement for CentOS that we've to use it...
You can use
0.centos.pool.ntp.org
1.centos.pool.ntp.org
or
X.pool.ntp.org
wh
Hello all
Can I use this to configure " ntp.conf " :
server ns1.bos.redhat.com
server 10.5.26.10
Or we have a replacement for CentOS that we've to use it...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
> From: denverpi...@me.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:25:27 -0700
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] remote logging with rsyslog
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
>
> > I
Oh! selinux (slap to forehead). Hadn't considered that. I've run into issues
with it before, so good call. I'll see what I can figure out there. I'll be back
in touch in a bit. Thanks!
One of the clients I want to monitor is a web server with a pretty heavy amount
of logging. From what I've read,
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Nelson Green wrote:
> I can change things around so that tcp is used instead of RELP, and everything
> works that way. The problem is specific to using RELP in the normal background
> mode. I also tested the above RELP configuration on two Debian Wheezy boxes,
> each
This is a similar post to one I've made on the rsyslog list that has received
no responses after four days, so I figured I'd try here since the problem
seems to be CentOS specific. This is also my second attempt to send it to
this list as the first seems to have never showed up.
I am trying to te
On 19/02/13 09:41, Toralf Lund wrote:
> On 02/18/2013 06:58 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Just thought I might ask my recent question about Eclipse again, only in
>>> a slightly different way:
>>>
>>> Is anyone here using the Eclipse version supplied with the CentOS 6
>>> distro (as opposed
On 14.02.2013 16:33, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Over on the bind-us...@lists.isc.org list, I am in a discussion about
> building the named.zone file, as Centos 6.3 does not provide it. It
> DOES provide a named.ca which is already old (wrt records) compared
> to the named.zone provided by inte
On 02/19/2013 08:17 AM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> "No need to worry. They are only hints, and named uses them to get the
>> current list of root name servers at startup. Even if they are 15 years
>> out of date it will still work, because the
On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> "No need to worry. They are only hints, and named uses them to get the
> current list of root name servers at startup. Even if they are 15 years
> out of date it will still work, because the root name servers do not
> change very often."
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Am 19.02.2013 um 01:50 schrieb Michael Hennebry
:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Paul Norton wrote:
>
>> On 18 February 2013 01:56, Michael Hennebry
>> wrote:
>
>>> Once the object files from fred.c and greg.c are linked,
>>> how does ELF distinguish the sfunc's and the x's?
>>> I've been trying to RTFM
On 02/18/2013 06:58 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just thought I might ask my recent question about Eclipse again, only in
>> a slightly different way:
>>
>> Is anyone here using the Eclipse version supplied with the CentOS 6
>> distro (as opposed to a build downloaded from www.eclipse.org)?
>> Hi
>>
>> Just thought I might ask my recent question about Eclipse again, only in
>> a slightly different way:
>>
>> Is anyone here using the Eclipse version supplied with the CentOS 6
>> distro (as opposed to a build downloaded from www.eclipse.org)? Does it
>> work for you? Are you able to ins
31 matches
Mail list logo
