Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-20 Thread Eero Volotinen
How about checking logs ? Eero On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my > new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. > In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going

Re: [CentOS] LDAP users/groups not showing up with nis, pam, & ldap

2013-02-20 Thread Cliff Pratt
Or just stopping it. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote: > Do you have nscd running? If so, try stopping and starting that. > > Cheers, > > Cliff > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Wes Modes wrote: >> I am trying to configure NIS, PAM, & LDAP on a CentOS 6.2 host. I've >>

Re: [CentOS] LDAP users/groups not showing up with nis, pam, & ldap

2013-02-20 Thread Cliff Pratt
Do you have nscd running? If so, try stopping and starting that. Cheers, Cliff On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Wes Modes wrote: > I am trying to configure NIS, PAM, & LDAP on a CentOS 6.2 host. I've > previously installed a similar configuration on RHEL4, but CentOS now > uses nss-pam-ldapd

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/20/2013 03:01 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 2/20/2013 3:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 2/20/2013 6:38 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: >>> On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings > about brands of memory? Googli

[CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my firewall was denied access to the internal domain. Localhost of course works.

[CentOS] LDAP users/groups not showing up with nis, pam, & ldap

2013-02-20 Thread Wes Modes
I am trying to configure NIS, PAM, & LDAP on a CentOS 6.2 host. I've previously installed a similar configuration on RHEL4, but CentOS now uses nss-pam-ldapd and nslcd instead of nss_ldap, so the configurations are a little different. Currently, local users and groups are showing up but not LDAP

Re: [CentOS] Nagios NRPE IPv6

2013-02-20 Thread skull
Am 17.02.2013 14:23, schrieb Tilman Schmidt: > Am 15.02.2013 19:27, schrieb Keith Keller: >> On 2013-02-15, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >>> On my network management server I have >>> >>> Name: nagios-plugins-nrpe >>> Arch: x86_64 >>> Version : 2.13 >>> Release : 1.el6 >>> Size

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/20/2013 12:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I'm looking at something called "Ballistix Sport 8GB DDR3-1333 >> (PC3-10600) >> CL9 Dual Channel". Was this the type that you had problems with, John? > > I had these problems with DDR2 stuff in the core2 generation of > proc

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/20/2013 12:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I'm looking at something called "Ballistix Sport 8GB DDR3-1333 (PC3-10600) > CL9 Dual Channel". Was this the type that you had problems with, John? I had these problems with DDR2 stuff in the core2 generation of processors, with the 3 and 4 series

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 2/20/2013 3:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/20/2013 6:38 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: >> On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings about brands of memory? Googling around, I see brands I've never*heard* of.

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/20/2013 6:38 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: >> On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> >So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings >>> >about brands of memory? Googling around, I see brands I've >>> never*heard* >>> >of >> I like Cruc

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/20/2013 6:38 AM, Patrick Lists wrote: > On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings >> >about brands of memory? Googling around, I see brands I've never*heard* >> >of > I like Crucial. I used to use Crucial.

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread Jake Shipton
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:40:01 + Ian Stirling wrote: > On 20/02/13 14:38, Patrick Lists wrote: > > On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> > > I like Crucial. Quality stuff, never had a memory stick failing and > > good service. Once I had an unopened box with some Crucial memory

[CentOS] New DNS server up and running

2013-02-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
A new and improved instance of onlo.htt-consult.com is up and providing DNS service. It is my 1st Centos 6.3 production box. This is Phase I which included IPv6 working 'right'. Phase II will be to sign my zone and get fully with DNSSEC. I want to thank people here in answering my questions.

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread Andrew Reis
> On 20/02/13 14:38, Patrick Lists wrote: > >> On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM, m.roth@5-cent.uswrote: >> >>> So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings about brands of memory? Googling around, I see brands I've never *heard* of >> I like Crucial. Quality stuff, never ha

Re: [CentOS] Bind - built in root hints?

2013-02-20 Thread Jay Leafey
A LONG time ago an older (at the time, I think I've caught up) sysadmin told me to use "dig" to update the named.ca file. Periodically he would run dig with no arguments and compare the output to the existing /var/named/named.ca file and copy it over the old one if anything had changed. Mayb

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread Ian Stirling
On 20/02/13 14:38, Patrick Lists wrote: > On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings >> about brands of memory? Googling around, I see brands I've never *heard* >> of > I like Crucial. Quality stuff, never had a memor

Re: [CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread Patrick Lists
On 02/20/2013 02:57 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings > about brands of memory? Googling around, I see brands I've never *heard* > of I like Crucial. Quality stuff, never had a memory stick failing and good service. Once I had

[CentOS] OT: memory brands?

2013-02-20 Thread m . roth
So, I'm rebuilding my system at home. Any recommendations or warnings about brands of memory? Googling around, I see brands I've never *heard* of mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 96, Issue 9

2013-02-20 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] NFS mount auto remount in case of problems.

2013-02-20 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 20.02.2013 um 11:29 schrieb Rafał Radecki : > Hi All. > > I have a setup in which I have two servers serving nfs share. The nfs > service is made highly available with pacemaker. When the primary > server goes down the secondary starts nfs service. Service IP is > floating between servers but t

[CentOS] NFS mount auto remount in case of problems.

2013-02-20 Thread Rafał Radecki
Hi All. I have a setup in which I have two servers serving nfs share. The nfs service is made highly available with pacemaker. When the primary server goes down the secondary starts nfs service. Service IP is floating between servers but they have NO "shared" storage/filesystem so NFS state/connec