Re: [CentOS] CUPS halts when no Internet

>> > > Hmmm... this sounds like common issues that crop up when you are having DNS resolution issues. Are the name servers for your network on the "other end" of the ADSL connection? If so, you might be able to resolve some of the issues by editing the hosts file to make sure the local systems ar

Re: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64?

On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 10:28 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Fred Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:40AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> > Behalf Of Fred Smith > >> > > >> > Adobe doesn't seem to have acroread for x86_64 linux, or at least I > >> > don't see it anywhere. > >> > > >> > A

[CentOS] Finding matching words in a word game

Hello, is there maybe a clever way of finding all possible words from a given set of letters by means of PostgreSQL (i.e. inside the database vs. scanning all database rows by a PHP script, which would take too long) - if the dictionary is kept in a simple table like: create table good_words (

Re: [CentOS] Finding matching words in a word game

I apologize - sent to a wrong mailing list! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CUPS halts when no Internet

The ADSL is connected toa switch and from that switch all the other clients and the server itself. All clients, LPD hosts and servers use IPs, I think no name resolution must be present for it to work. Yesterday I switched servers to a backup CentOS 5 install that works excelent with or without In

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote: > I have been reading about software raid. I configured my first software > raid system about a month ago. > > I have 4 500 Gig drives configured in RAID 5 configuration with a total of > 1.5TB. > > Currently I configured the complete individu

Re: [CentOS] network connectivity lost after reboot/upgrade

Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:15:46 +0100: > Has anyone seen such a hardware failure where the link goes up but no > packets go over the wire? It seems a bit unlikely that this hardware > failure (and nothing else) should happen on a reboot after an upgrade. It was indeed a weird ha

Re: [CentOS] Google Earth on EL6.x x86_64

On 04/03/13 04:35, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:26AM +0800, Earl Ramirez wrote: >> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 21:49 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: >>> Has anyone gotten 64-bit google earth to run on el6 x86_64? >>> >>> It dies almost immediately, complaining for lack of ld-lsb.so.3. >>> P

[CentOS] fencing nodes with drac under 5.9

Hi all, A recent update to CentOS 5.9 has broken my cluster's ability to fence nodes. I have two Dell's which are both fenced via their DRAC6 cards. The current configuration in cluster.conf for the fencing devices is: After the updates, when one of the two systems comes online and starts the

Re: [CentOS] Centos6 ipsec troubles

Hello, I managed to make ipsec-tools work on CentOS 6.x here is how I did it: http://unix.wikinet.org/wiki/Configure_IPSec_on_CentOS_6.x_using_Kame_implementation#Modify_network_scripts thanks Rick On 3/5/13 12:01 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 03/04/2013 07:45 AM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: >

[CentOS] ProLiant ML110 G7

How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives. -- Juan Pablo De Mola Rodríguez ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ProLiant ML110 G7

Juan De Mola wrote: > How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives. > A number of questions: first, does it have a hardware RAID controller? If so, has it been configured via firmware to present drives to the o/s? mark ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] Centos6 ipsec troubles

On 03/05/2013 08:13 AM, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: > I managed to make ipsec-tools work on CentOS 6.x > here is how I did it: Yes, you got a tunnel working between two systems both running ipsec-tools on Linux. Try to link with anything else. The configuration that you present will not work with

Re: [CentOS] ProLiant ML110 G7

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Juan De Mola wrote: >> How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives. >> > A number of questions: first, does it have a hardware RAID controller? If > so, has it been configured via firmware to present drives to the o/s? > Oh, yes - bad form to follow myself u

Re: [CentOS] ProLiant ML110 G7

Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as Legacy Support. Puting it on AHCI allowed to see the disk. At least the one that is connected. 2013/3/5 : > Juan De Mola wrote: >> How I can set up CentOS 5 on it if it don't see the drives. >> > A number of questions: first, does

Re: [CentOS] ProLiant ML110 G7

On 3/5/2013 8:58 AM, Juan De Mola wrote: > Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as > Legacy Support. Puting it on AHCI allowed to see the disk. At least > the one that is connected. that sounds like fake raid, not real HW raid like a smartarray p400 -- john r pierce

Re: [CentOS] ProLiant ML110 G7

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Juan De Mola wrote: > Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as > Legacy Support. Puting it on AHCI allowed to see the disk. At least > the one that is connected. > If the RAID controller has a raid1 array set up then you'll only see one

Re: [CentOS] ProLiant ML110 G7

Fake (software) or real (hardware) it only allow install in AHCI mode, for the records. It is now running the OS. Install complete. Thanks. 2013/3/5 John R Pierce : > On 3/5/2013 8:58 AM, Juan De Mola wrote: >> Yes it has hardware RAID, two 250GB disk. But on BIOS it is set as >> Legacy Support. P

Re: [CentOS] network connectivity lost after reboot/upgrade

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:15:46 +0100: > > > Has anyone seen such a hardware failure where the link goes up but no > > packets go over the wire? It seems a bit unlikely that this hardware > > failure (and nothing else) should ha

Re: [CentOS] network connectivity lost after reboot/upgrade

SilverTip257 wrote on Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:28:29 -0500: > But it would have been helpful if you had shared more information (think > NIC model, NIC chipset, kernel module in use for that chipset). Why? It's quite clear that this is a hardware failure. I tested a live CD and PXE booting on it with

[CentOS] New java update?

I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update? mark ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day > vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update? > > > As soon as

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day >> vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update? >> >>

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On 03/05/2013 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day >>> vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update? >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/05/2013 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an update?

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On 03/05/2013 12:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/05/2013 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 03/05/2013 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I see there's a release today or so from Oracle of a new zero-day vulnerability. Any idea how soon we'll have an updat

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> > When will CentOS-6.4 be released ... soon :) > > When is soon ... I would expect sometime before Friday, March 8th (or > very close to that date). Thanks for posting a projected date. I promise not to rant if you miss it... -- Les Mi

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM, wrote: > trying to figure out if it *only* affects Oracle's java, > or openjdk also. OpenJDK IS Oracle´s java, sans the browser plug-in which was never open sourced by Sun, and which is provided by Icedtea-web. Oracle has made OpenJDK 7 the reference implementati

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On 03/05/2013 08:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >> When will CentOS-6.4 be released ... soon :) >> >> When is soon ... I would expect sometime before Friday, March 8th (or >> very close to that date). > > Thanks for posting a projected date.

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, wrote: > I'd found that in googling, but it only mentioned Oracle. Because the new pastime of the mainstream IT press (specially IDG; ZDNet which includes many Microsoft employees that write slamming Java) is slamming Oracle, not educating about OpenJDK and its op

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 03/05/2013 08:13 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> When will CentOS-6.4 be released ... soon :) >>> >>> When is soon ... I would expect sometime before Friday, March 8th (or >>> very close to that date). >> >> Thanks

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, wrote: >> I'd found that in googling, but it only mentioned Oracle. > > Because the new pastime of the mainstream IT press (specially IDG; > ZDNet which includes many Microsoft employees that write slamming > Java) is slamming Oracle, not e

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, wrote: > What do you mean M$ employees? http://zdnet.sumben.com/?/meet-the-team/us/jason.perlow/ "Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet ..." "... Jason is currently a Technology Solution Professional with Microsoft Corp. " > I've never worked for M$, have

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:29 PM, wrote: >> > What do you mean M$ employees? I've never worked for M$, have stayed away > from WinDoze for many years, and I *loathe* java, which failed in > everything it was sold on the basis of being able to solve in the > mid-nineties Errr, beg your pardon?

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On 3/5/2013 12:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > What do you mean M$ employees? I've never worked for M$ you work for ZDNet or another 'mainstream IT press' outfit? -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:29 PM, wrote: >>> >> What do you mean M$ employees? I've never worked for M$, have stayed >> away >> from WinDoze for many years, and I *loathe* java, which failed in >> everything it was sold on the basis of being able to solve in the >> mid-ninetie

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Am 05.03.2013 um 18:51 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > I see there's a release today The question is rather: are there days without new "emergency patches" for Java? And at what point does an "emergency" become a permanent condition…. ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 05.03.2013 um 18:51 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > >> I see there's a release today > > The question is rather: are there days without new "emergency patches" for > Java? And at what point does an "emergency" become a permanent condition…. Oh, come on. The last one was al

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > The question is rather: are there days without new "emergency patches" for > Java? Yeah, right, like there are no 0day patches periodically for a multitude of software, including Apache, PHP, and the like. And what are Microsoft´s "Patch Tu

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:54 PM, wrote: > >> > tomcat? Ton's o' websites with java, that are really, really slow, and > break easily? Tell you what - install OpenGrok http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/ (grab it quick it, it is moving soon) and index/browse/search a large codeba

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:54 PM, wrote: >> >> >> tomcat? Ton's o' websites with java, that are really, really slow, and >> break easily? > > Tell you what - install OpenGrok > http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/ (grab it quick > it, it is moving soon) and in

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:36 PM, wrote: >> >> >>> tomcat? Ton's o' websites with java, that are really, really slow, and >>> break easily? >> >> Tell you what - install OpenGrok >> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+opengrok/ (grab it quick >> it, it is moving soon) and index/browse/searc

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 06:23:25PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > Yeah, right, like there are no 0day patches periodically for a > multitude of software, including Apache, PHP, and the like. And what > are Microsoft´s "Patch Tuesday" Windows updates for, after all?. Please. Java is doing ever

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > Please. > > Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity records > of sendmail and bind from years ago, or horde's track record or phpBB's. > It's just one rolling security vector. It's apparently maintained by > people

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> >> Please. >> >> Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity records >> of sendmail and bind from years ago, or horde's track record or phpBB's. >> It's just one rolling security vector. It's appar

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On 3/5/2013 1:57 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity ... sad, really, as one of Java's original goals was to be a completely sandboxable environment. I wonder... is Java really getting worse, or is it that the hackers are getting more so

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:04 PM, wrote: > >> Please. >>> >>> Java is doing everything in it's power to rival the insecurity records >>> of sendmail and bind from years ago, or horde's track record or phpBB's. >>> It's just one rolling security vector. It's apparently maintained by >>> people that

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:10:02PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > > sad, really, as one of Java's original goals was to be a completely > sandboxable environment. I was just discussing this very issue with someone the other day. That was such a huge marketing factor in the beginning. And we wai

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > I'm talking about all those years when Sun's baby was pretty good and > "free as in beer" but not good/free enough for Red Hat to bless with > an installer that actually worked so we got the broken gcj instead and > made everybody h

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

John R. Dennison wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> I'm talking about all those years when Sun's baby was pretty good and >> "free as in beer" but not good/free enough for Red Hat to bless with >> an installer that actually worked so we got the broken gcj i

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:20 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> >> sad, really, as one of Java's original goals was to be a completely >> sandboxable environment. > > I was just discussing this very issue with someone the other day. That > was such a huge marketing factor in the beginning. And we wai

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> >> I'm talking about all those years when Sun's baby was pretty good and >> "free as in beer" but not good/free enough for Red Hat to bless with >> an installer that actually worked so we got the broken gcj instead and >> made everybody ha

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On 3/5/2013 2:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Free as in what the FSF names code encumbered with restrictions that > prevent combining it with any other components. specifically, the Sun Java license restricted redistribution of the runtime, and it wasn't opensource at all. further, it had type-of

Re: [CentOS] fencing nodes with drac under 5.9

> I have two Dell's which are both fenced via their DRAC6 cards. Without your cluster config, we can only guess. Fencing w/ two nodes requires specific startup config for this scenario. Given that, I presume you can find your issue, or post your conf. jlc ___

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Free as in what the FSF names code encumbered with restrictions that >> prevent combining it with any other components. > > specifically, the Sun Java license restricted redistribution of the > runtime, and it wasn't opensource at all. I m

Re: [CentOS] fencing nodes with drac under 5.9

Thanks for the response. I just discovered the problem about 30' ago. post_join_delay was set to the default of 3, meaning that it was only waiting 3 seconds for the node to join before fencing it. Silly. After changing that to 300 seconds, it worked fine. The config was this way with 5.8 and

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, wrote: > I've never worked for M$, have stayed away > from WinDoze for many years, and I *loathe* java It´s amazing the Java haters are not content with hating it in silence, they must spread their dislike and insisit that everyone else should hate it too. Just d

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions

On 03/04/2013 10:53 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote: > I have been reading about software raid. I configured my first software raid > system about a month ago. > > I have 4 500 Gig drives configured in RAID 5 configuration with a total of > 1.5TB. > > Currently I configured the complete individual drive

Re: [CentOS] fencing nodes with drac under 5.9

Turns out I spoke too soon. Increasing the post_join_delay did at least allow me to restart the cman+clvmd+gfs2+rgmanager services on each node, but if I reboot a node, it will not rejoin the cluster. If I start with both machines up, and cman stopped, I can start cman on one, then then the other

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions

On 3/5/2013 4:27 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > The question is why are you using raid at all? indeed. the primary justification for the "R" in RAID, Redundant, is high availability. having the OS on a non-raid volume completely violates this.RAID is most definitely NOT a substitute for ba

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions

I essentially configured the software raid to create a home server and not have to worry about individual drives. I've built a collection of several several gigs of music and pictures. Enough to look into a raid system. Plus it is alot cheaper than a hardware raid setup. Plus I want to do testin

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions

On 3/5/2013 5:18 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote: > I essentially configured the software raid to create a home server and not > have to worry about individual drives. I've built a collection of several > several gigs of music and pictures. Enough to look into a raid system. Plus > it is alot cheaper t

Re: [CentOS] fencing nodes with drac under 5.9

> Turns out I spoke too soon.  Slow down cowboy, man fenced:) See clean_start for example. There are more than one param needed for a two node cluster. https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FAQ/Fencing#fence_stuck https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FAQ/Fencing#fence_startup Much discu

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions

Im not so much concerned about the os not being on a raid system. I am really concerned about my data, music, pictures,docs, etc. I run a minimum os centos 5.9 install anyway so it would take long to reload the os if i had to. -Original Message- From: John R Pierce Sent: 3/5/2013 6:45 PM

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions

Im in the process of configuring my data to be backed up to external devices. -Original Message- From: John R Pierce Sent: 3/5/2013 6:45 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Software RAID complete drives or individual partitions On 3/5/2013 4:27 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > The qu

Re: [CentOS] fencing nodes with drac under 5.9

Brilliant. Many thanks. I love great documentation: "once the guns are out, someone *must* win" Adam Wead Systems and Digital Collections Librarian Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum 216.515.1960 (t) 215.515.1964 (f) On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:44 PM

Re: [CentOS] Google Earth on EL6.x x86_64

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:59:01PM +0100, Toralf Lund wrote: > On 04/03/13 04:35, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:56:26AM +0800, Earl Ramirez wrote: > >> On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 21:49 -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > >>> Has anyone gotten 64-bit google earth to run on el6 x86_64? > >>> > >