Re: [CentOS] What is bind97 and what are the differences to bind

2013-04-04 Thread Banyan He
Just some different versions. Here you go, bind.x86_64 30:9.3.6-20.P1.el5_8.5 base bind97.x86_64 32:9.7.0-17.P2.el5 base As you can see, bind is 9.3.6-20.P1, and bind97 is 9.7.0-17.P2. Banyan He Blog: http://www.rootong.com Email: ban...@root

[CentOS] What is bind97 and what are the differences to bind

2013-04-04 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
Hi, sorry if this has been covered, I searched google for this but can't find an answer (maybe I am trying the incorrect search terms). What is bind97? What are the differences between bind97 and bind? thanks Jobst -- Fortune: No such file or directory. | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jo.

Re: [CentOS] UIDs different [SOLVED]

2013-04-04 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Odd problem. Two 6.4 boxes, and a user's home directory is automounted. >> /etc/passwd are identical... but once mounted on the other server, if we >> su - to that user, what we see is an old UID of his, from a while back >> (years?), while on t

Re: [CentOS] UIDs different

2013-04-04 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Odd problem. Two 6.4 boxes, and a user's home directory is automounted. > /etc/passwd are identical... but once mounted on the other server, if we > su - to that user, what we see is an old UID of his, from a while back > (years?), while on the home directory server, it's

[CentOS] UIDs different

2013-04-04 Thread m . roth
Odd problem. Two 6.4 boxes, and a user's home directory is automounted. /etc/passwd are identical... but once mounted on the other server, if we su - to that user, what we see is an old UID of his, from a while back (years?), while on the home directory server, it's the current, correct UID. Anyo

Re: [CentOS] Using "root" Type User Via Forwarding-SSH-Tunnel Inside Non-Root SSH Connection

2013-04-04 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Bry8 Star wrote: > Hi, > QUESTION: > what implications are there when using the "root" or a root type of > account via a port-forwarding ssh-tunnel inside (or on top of) > another non-root type of user's ssh-tunnel ? > > Is such double layer of encryption brings more security or system > still vuln

Re: [CentOS] C6: tcp-wrapping pop3?

2013-04-04 Thread Max Pyziur
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Eero Volotinen wrote: > http://blog.acsystem.sk/linux/brute-force-attack-dovecot-imap-server-blocking-ip-with-tcp-wrappers Much thanks for the link; there is this one also: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LoginProcess (you need to go to the very bottom) > so, I think that process na

[CentOS] Using "root" Type User Via Forwarding-SSH-Tunnel Inside Non-Root SSH Connection

2013-04-04 Thread Bry8 Star
Hi, QUESTION: what implications are there when using the "root" or a root type of account via a port-forwarding ssh-tunnel inside (or on top of) another non-root type of user's ssh-tunnel ? Is such double layer of encryption brings more security or system still vulnerable same as single layer of S