On 05/03/2013 06:05 PM, Rob Townley wrote:
> Michael, very frustrating that so much noise for a very simple request. I
> set up multi source routing in 5.3 or so and was astounded at all the
> negativity on this list and that it could not be done. It will take
> forever to read the noise in this
On 05/03/2013 05:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 08:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
>
> Alternate source routing, firewall and netfilter marking of packets:
>
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 172.24.5.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 100 #
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s
Michael, very frustrating that so much noise for a very simple request. I
set up multi source routing in 5.3 or so and was astounded at all the
negativity on this list and that it could not be done. It will take
forever to read the noise in this thread alone. Some said you have to use
DHCP i
> repeat 10 some_command
Found this on the web somewhere:
#!/bin/sh
i=0
num=$1
shift
while [ $(( i += 1 )) -le $num ]; do
eval "$@"
done
Worked fine. Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 05/03/2013 03:24 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:52 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
>
>> Curiously, at least one guy has reported success:
>
>> http://sysadminsjourney.com/content/2009/04/15/doing-simple-source-policy-routing-centos/
>
>> Now, the only thing diffe
On 05/02/2013 08:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 02:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> with its default gateway pointing toward the ISP handling it. DNS
service is simple enough to have standalone servers for each instance
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>
>> Is it _really_ that hard to type the explicit loop with test ([) and
>> expr? These were builtins even in bourne shell eons ago.
>
> Here is the simplest possible solution, and exactly what I think the OP was
> looking for:
>
> http://www.mel
On Fri, 3 May 2013 13:02:47 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is it _really_ that hard to type the explicit loop with test ([) and
> expr? These were builtins even in bourne shell eons ago.
Here is the simplest possible solution, and exactly what I think the OP was
looking for:
http://www.melvilleth
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:52 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/01/2013 05:15 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:05 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> >> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
> >> can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:23 PM, wrote:
>
True. Thing I like about seq is that it also takes an optional
increment value which can be very handy at times.
>>>
>>> Is it _really_ that hard to type the explicit loop with test ([) and
>>> expr? These were builtins e
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:23 PM, wrote:
>>> True. Thing I like about seq is that it also takes an optional
>>> increment value which can be very handy at times.
>>
>> Is it _really_ that hard to type the explicit loop with test ([) and
>> expr? These were builtins even in bourne shell eons ago
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:45 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:36:36AM +0200, Markus Falb wrote:
>>>
>>> this works but at least with bash you can do it with brace expansion
>>> for x in {1..10}; do … ; done
>>>
>>> it's a bashism but maybe more portabl
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:45 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:36:36AM +0200, Markus Falb wrote:
>>
>> this works but at least with bash you can do it with brace expansion
>> for x in {1..10}; do … ; done
>>
>> it's a bashism but maybe more portable, e.g. OS-X has no seq
>> n
On 02.Mai.2013, at 18:13, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> The problem is that kickstart doesn't allow
> dashed in volume group names?
It seems so.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186439
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407701
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=43
On Fri, 3 May 2013 12:32:28 +0200
Markus Falb wrote:
> On 02.Mai.2013, at 00:54, Rock wrote:
>
> > I also found out elsewhere that Thunderbird has native
> > SSL support - but TB treats NNTP as SMTP which makes
> > it difficult, if not unwieldy to use.
>
> What exactly do you mean with that?
>
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 02.05.2013 18:33, maxxik wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03/05/13 00:13, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm trying to setup the provisioning of new OpenStack hypervisors with
>>> cinder volumes on them. The problem is that kickstart doesn't allow
>>> dashed in volume g
On 02.05.2013 18:33, maxxik wrote:
> Hi Dennis
>
> Did you try to screen it via "\" ? i.e. "volgroup cinder\-volumes
> --pesize=4096 pv.02" ?
Just tried this and the volume group still ends up as "cindervolumes".
>
> On 03/05/13 00:13, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to setup th
On 02.Mai.2013, at 00:54, Rock wrote:
> I also found out elsewhere that Thunderbird has native
> SSL support - but TB treats NNTP as SMTP which makes
> it difficult, if not unwieldy to use.
What exactly do you mean with that?
At times I use thunderbird with the gmane news to mail gateway and it s
On 03.Mai.2013, at 08:12, Rock wrote:
> On Thu, 02 May 2013 20:36:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> I like knode (in kdepim rpm)
…
> So, looking for a Centos RPM repository:
> $ yum --noplugins --showduplicates --enablerepo \* --disablerepo c6-
> media,\*-source,\*debug\* provides "*/knode"
you
19 matches
Mail list logo
