On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have two different IP addresses (in a block of /29), one is on port 0 and
> the other is on port 2 of a Ciso 888.
> I am doing this so I can have two different certs with two different ip
> addresses.
>
> I have tried:
>
>
I'm preparing my new Sendmail mail server with pop3s + smtps where user
authentication occurs through Microsoft Active Directory by Winbind daemon.
OS is Centos 6.4 and Sendmail is 8.14
Mailboxes will be in this server but how to create them !??!
It's necessary to add user by 'useradd' command int
Hi,
Two IP addresses within the same subnet is generally something that should
be avoided if at all possible.
See
http://serverfault.com/questions/336021/two-network-interfaces-and-two-ip-addresses-on-the-same-subnet-in-linuxfor
some information that may help.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM,
Hi
I have two different IP addresses (in a block of /29), one is on port 0 and the
other is on port 2 of a Ciso 888.
I am doing this so I can have two different certs with two different ip
addresses.
I have tried:
1) one machine, two real interfaces, two cables (eth0 and eth2)
2) one machin
On 08/19/2013 09:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/19/2013 5:20 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
>> So I just got ahold of an old e-Machine (Model EL1600) with 1GB of
>> memory. I was going to install CEntOS on it and try to run VirtualBox
>> for other OS'es. I am curious to know if I have to stic
On 8/19/2013 5:20 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> So I just got ahold of an old e-Machine (Model EL1600) with 1GB of
> memory. I was going to install CEntOS on it and try to run VirtualBox
> for other OS'es. I am curious to know if I have to stick with the 2GB
> "max" the specs say the machine c
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:20:28PM -0400, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> So I just got ahold of an old e-Machine (Model EL1600) with 1GB of
Umm, this machine?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883114074
> memory. I was going to install CEntOS on it and try to run VirtualBox
So I just got ahold of an old e-Machine (Model EL1600) with 1GB of
memory. I was going to install CEntOS on it and try to run VirtualBox
for other OS'es. I am curious to know if I have to stick with the 2GB
"max" the specs say the machine can take or if its possible to install a
4GB module that
On 2013-08-19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> If you know about problems, send evidence
The problem seems to be that you would rather rant about distributions'
licensing and packaging decisions than help the OP. It seems like he
would be perfectly happy to use your version of cdrtools, yet you insist
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
>>
>> This isn't aimed at you personally, but the reason people like
>> RHEL/CentOS is that the 'no known bugs' status of a developer's
>> software release often turns pretty quickly into 'bugs with no known
>> fix' when they hit a wider di
Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-08-19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > Redhat had more than 100 bugs filed against the "cdrtools" version they
> > ship.
> > All these bugs could be avoided by upgrading to a recent original version.
> > Redhat closed these unfixed bugs instead of doing it's homewo
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > maybe you do not know who Joerg Schilling is
> >
> > he is the one person claiming he is the only one writing a
> > working cd-burning software on earth and his fights against
> > GPL and Linux are legend over th
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
>
> >> >> > Would you like to run a Linux kernel from 2004 today?
> >>
> >> Has the CD format changed since 2004?
> >
> > This is why you are happy with buggy software from 2004 shipped by redhat
> > when
> > there
On 2013-08-19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> Redhat had more than 100 bugs filed against the "cdrtools" version they ship.
> All these bugs could be avoided by upgrading to a recent original version.
> Redhat closed these unfixed bugs instead of doing it's homework that would
> result in updated ve
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> maybe you do not know who Joerg Schilling is
>
> he is the one person claiming he is the only one writing a
> working cd-burning software on earth and his fights against
> GPL and Linux are legend over the years
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>> >> > Would you like to run a Linux kernel from 2004 today?
>>
>> Has the CD format changed since 2004?
>
> This is why you are happy with buggy software from 2004 shipped by redhat when
> there is software with no known bugs?
This isn't
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > >
> >> > Would you like to run a Linux kernel from 2004 today?
>
> Has the CD format changed since 2004?
This is why you are happy with buggy software from 2004 shipped by redhat when
there is software with no
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> >
>> > Would you like to run a Linux kernel from 2004 today?
Has the CD format changed since 2004?
> In other words, you either choose a distro that offers up to date packages or
> you need to compile yourself.
I'm sure you realize that
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Gene Poole wrote:
> Let me say that your question does not match your subject.
>
> I run a 32-bit CentOS with virt-manager installed to monitor the virtual
> machines running on a 64-bit CentOS. That leaves the following:
>
> Is it because I'm running CentOS 5.9 i
ken wrote:
> > There is nothing like: cdrtools-2.01-10.7.el5
>
> [cdrtools-2.01-10.7.el5 ist einmalig???]
>
> You're saying this is the preferred package, yes? and it will have the
> functionality needed? If yes and yes, where does one get that package?
>
> Note that my rpm command output abov
On 08/19/2013 09:58 AM Joerg Schilling wrote:
> ken wrote:
>
>>> If you are using this bad fork that is from September 2004 - 9 years ago,
>>> you
>>> suffer from many problems, like incomplete documentation and many bugs that
>>> cannot be found in the original software.
>>
>> cdrecord and read
I'm trying to work out the kinks of a proprietary, old, and clunky
application that runs on CentOS. One of its main problems is that it
writes image sequences extremely non-linearly and in several passes,
using many CPUs, so the sequences get very fragmented.
The obvious solution to this seems
Let me say that your question does not match your subject.
I run a 32-bit CentOS with virt-manager installed to monitor the virtual
machines running on a 64-bit CentOS. That leaves the following:
Is it because I'm running CentOS 5.9 in both cases?
Or is it because I performed a full install fro
On Aug 17, 2013, at 5:16 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 8/16/2013 10:51 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
>> Some years ago I installed a NAS unit from Exanet which consists of 2
>> rebadged IBM x3650 head nodes and a couple of Xyratex disk shelves with a
>> total of 96 TB of raw disk, connected by fibr
Joseph Spenner wrote:
> On 08/18/2013 09:30 PM, Anthony K wrote:
>>
>> I was recently approached by Dell stating that I HAVE TO renew my Red
>> Hat Subscriptions. I challenged this statement and was informed that
>> this has always been the case and that all servers I have bought off of
>> Dell ov
On 08/18/2013 09:30 PM, Anthony K wrote:
> Hello List Members.
>
> I was recently approached by Dell stating that I HAVE TO renew my Red
> Hat Subscriptions. I challenged this statement and was informed that
> this has always been the case and that all servers I have bought off of
> Dell over
ken wrote:
> > If you are using this bad fork that is from September 2004 - 9 years ago,
> > you
> > suffer from many problems, like incomplete documentation and many bugs that
> > cannot be found in the original software.
>
> cdrecord and readcd are both part of this package:
>
> $ rpm -qi cdr
On 08/18/2013 09:30 PM, Anthony K wrote:
> Hello List Members.
>
> I was recently approached by Dell stating that I HAVE TO renew my Red
> Hat Subscriptions. I challenged this statement and was informed that
> this has always been the case and that all servers I have bought off of
> Dell over t
On 08/18/2013 04:13 PM Joerg Schilling wrote:
> ken wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your reply. As late as November 2012 I always used the CLI
>> for copying *data* CDs, using cdrecord and readcd. But though I read
>> and studied manpages and scads of documentation, I never had any luck
>> cloning a musi
> How does Dell know what OS your are running?
> Should they know what OS you are running?
> Dell provides the hardware only?
Dell sells OEM RHEL and standard (Red Hat) RHEL as a software reseller.
In OEM RHEL, Dell provides all but the highest level (passing the
highest level back to Red Hat )
On 8/18/2013 7:30 PM, Anthony K wrote:
> I was recently approached by Dell stating that I HAVE TO renew my Red
> Hat Subscriptions. I challenged this statement and was informed that
> this has always been the case and that all servers I have bought off of
> Dell over the years need to have current
On 19.Aug.2013, at 04:30, Anthony K wrote:
> I was recently approached by Dell stating that I HAVE TO renew my Red
> Hat Subscriptions.
How does Dell know what OS your are running?
Should they know what OS you are running?
Dell provides the hardware only?
I am confused about this. I do not ha
32 matches
Mail list logo
