Hi,
At office, we have I ISPs.
I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several
routing.
For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated
server.
The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png
Default route is via ISP1.
If OVH
Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, wrote:
>> Big question: what manufacturer, and what support chips? Most of our
>> Dells have PERC 6xx or 7xx, which is good hardware RAID. We have
several boxes
>> with the Intel RAID on chip - aka fakeRAID. They are a *pain*, and we
>>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Thu, November 14, 2013 12:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 14.11.2013 18:23, schrieb James B. Byrne:
From what I have read it appears that the system disk must use RAID 1
if it uses RAID at all.
>>>
>> So, this is sayi
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Glenn Eychaner wrote:
> Nvidia driver fixed the problem. Thank you El Repo! Where do I send you
> $10? (Seriously. This saved me so much time.)
>
> -G.
You can send a thank-you email to contact elrepo.org instead. :-)
Akemi
__
James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Thu, November 14, 2013 12:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 14.11.2013 18:23, schrieb James B. Byrne:
>>> From what I have read it appears that the system disk must use RAID 1
>>> if it uses RAID at all.
>>
> So, this is saying, if I read it aright, that one can have multipl
On Thu, November 14, 2013 12:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.11.2013 18:23, schrieb James B. Byrne:
>> From what I have read it appears that the system disk must use RAID 1 if it
>> uses RAID at all.
>
> no!
>
> /boot must be RAID1, see below
> md0: /boot
> md1: /
> md2: /data
>
> [root@srv-r
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Arch = x86_64
> CentOS-6.4
>
> We have a cold server with 32Gb RAM and 8 x 3TB SATA drives mounted in
> hotswap cells. The intended purpose of this system is as an ERP
application and
> DBMS host. The ERP application will likely eventually have web access
but at
> the mome
On 11/14/2013 12:52 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>I do agree that for the amount of drives he has, raid10 seems to
> be the way to go. That said, what about raid6?
every random write has to read/modify/write 3 drives on raid6. raid6
rebuilds are painfully slow.raid6 write performance d
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:04 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:23 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> Arch = x86_64
>> CentOS-6.4
>>
>> We have a cold server with 32Gb RAM and 8 x 3TB SATA drives mounted in
>> hotswap
>> cells. The intended purpose of this system is as an ERP applic
Nvidia driver fixed the problem. Thank you El Repo! Where do I send you $10?
(Seriously. This saved me so much time.)
-G.
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> If you just want an easy solution you could try the nvidia drivers from
> elrepo. Start with nvidia-detect to find out which version you nee
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:59 AM, zGreenfelder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Rita wrote:
>> Thanks for the detailed response.
>>
>>
>> My problem is we have many NFS servers and clients. The client mounts to
>> the servers using /net/serverA/dirA. When server A is decommissioned all
>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:23 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Arch = x86_64
> CentOS-6.4
>
> We have a cold server with 32Gb RAM and 8 x 3TB SATA drives mounted in
> hotswap
> cells. The intended purpose of this system is as an ERP application and
> DBMS
> host. The ERP application will likely event
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Rita wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed response.
>
>
> My problem is we have many NFS servers and clients. The client mounts to
> the servers using /net/serverA/dirA. When server A is decommissioned all
> the clients hand on `df`. I was wondering if there is a clean
Arch = x86_64
CentOS-6.4
We have a cold server with 32Gb RAM and 8 x 3TB SATA drives mounted in hotswap
cells. The intended purpose of this system is as an ERP application and DBMS
host. The ERP application will likely eventually have web access but at the
moment only dedicated client applicatio
From: Rita
> My problem is we have many NFS servers and clients. The client mounts to
> the servers using /net/serverA/dirA. When server A is decommissioned all
> the clients hand on `df`. I was wondering if there is a clean way to
> unmount the server instead of rebooting clients (100+ clients).
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Thanks for the detailed response.
My problem is we have many NFS servers and clients. The client mounts to
the servers using /net/serverA/dirA. When server A is decommissioned all
the clients hand on `df`. I was wondering if there is a clean way to
unmount the server instead of rebooting clients
17 matches
Mail list logo
