Hey Michael,
The TPM can be an issue but once you install the OS(LINUX) on DISK(maybe
on another machine) it should fly by default.
What is the meaning of "Trusted" by HP\COMPAQ? I do not know yet.
From what I understand a Refurbished means "Used and was used in a
company\office the last time
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> What Refurbished means?
newegg:
"Refurbished" products have been tested to ensure compliance with original
manufacturer specifications, and MAY include a limited manufacturer warranty -
see the item's product page for details."
> The hardware by it
What Refurbished means?
The hardware by itself looks nice but it might be a noisy machine.
HP support only windows Vista for this machine and I do not know what
bios and CHIPS it was built upon yet.
If it has the parts that this review claims:
http://reviews.cnet.com/desktops/hp-compaq-business-
On 07 December 2013 @02:57 zulu, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> I do not remember which is the IDE and which is the new SATA.
The SATA drive has the thin red cable connecting it to the motherboard.
> I suspect the pincushiony thing between the video card and the big
> black Intel fan of being the hea
On 06/12/13 09:37 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 12/07/2013 02:39 AM, psavoie1783 wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a marvel chipset for my wired laptop connection. It uses the
>> kmod-sk98lin-10.93.3.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm driver at elrepo.
>>
>> I would like to use this driver to activate the wire
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013, Warren Young wrote:
> On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> The power supply is a sealed unit,
>
> I think you'll find that once you unscrew it from the case, you'll
> expose another set of screws that will let you remove the power supply's
> lid. The odd hole in the
I'd thought I'd sent this already.
Apparently the last crap out was before I'd hit send.
BTW the last few crap outs have been followed
with processor area temps up to 60 C.
I suspect that my jpg's are too big to go through as attachments,
so I've put them on my web site:
http://web.cs.ndsu.nodak.
On 12/07/2013 02:39 AM, psavoie1783 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a marvel chipset for my wired laptop connection. It uses the
> kmod-sk98lin-10.93.3.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm driver at elrepo.
>
> I would like to use this driver to activate the wired connection to
> kickstart my laptop as I have
On 12/6/2013 18:00, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/6/2013 4:39 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote:
There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there.
>> It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC
>> manufacturer chooses not to pop
Hi All,
I have a marvel chipset for my wired laptop connection. It uses the
kmod-sk98lin-10.93.3.3-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm driver at elrepo.
I would like to use this driver to activate the wired connection to
kickstart my laptop as I have pxe booting set upon my home network.
Could anyone plea
On 12/6/2013 4:39 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> >There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there.
> It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC
> manufacturer chooses not to populate.
its pretty common on high end cases too
On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there.
It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC
manufacturer chooses not to populate.
If you decide to put a fan there, be sure to orient it so it blows "in
line" with the
I've got a side of the case off.
All the fans that are there are turning.
There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there.
Unless someone stole a fan, that is not new.
The plastic front of the case would have pretty much blocked it.
No obvious leakage from anything.
The power supply is a sealed
On 6 December 2013 19:25, Robert Clove wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query
> that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the
> system or when we send a packet from a system?
These slides might help you with your goo
Tcpdump won"t tell the system calls
On Saturday, December 7, 2013, wrote:
> Robert Clove wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query
> > that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the
> > system or when we send a pac
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/6/2013 11:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a
>>> query that how to know that what system call are called when packet
enters
>>> the system or when we send a packet from a system?
>> Hi, there. Sounds li
On 12/6/2013 11:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> If you know the process, you could use strace.
that will only show user mode calls, which are basically select() and
read(). as I said, the packet transversal is all done in the network
related kernel modules, under the covers where strace can't
On 12/6/2013 11:28 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query
>> >that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the
>> >system or when we send a packet from a system?
> Hi, there. Sounds like you want to do a tcpdum
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Robert Clove wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query
> that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the
> system or when we send a packet from a system?
>
> Thanks
>
This link might hel
Robert Clove wrote:
> On Saturday, December 7, 2013, wrote:
>> Robert Clove wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a
>> > query that how to know that what system call are called when packet
enters
>> > the system or when we send a packet from a system?
>>
Tcpdump won"t tell the system calls
On Saturday, December 7, 2013, wrote:
> Robert Clove wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query
> > that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the
> > system or when we send a pac
Robert Clove wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query
> that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the
> system or when we send a packet from a system?
Hi, there. Sounds like you want to do a tcpdump, or some such, on et
Hi All
I don't know whether i am asking on a correct list or not i have a query
that how to know that what system call are called when packet enters the
system or when we send a packet from a system?
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Wes James wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe wrote:
>
>> From: Wes James
>>
>> > Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many
>> panes,
>> > but the corner trick will have to do.
>>
>> I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to "move
On 04.12.2013 14:05, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>>> >>On 04.12.2013 14:05, John Doe wrote:
> From: Lists
>
>>> >>Our next big test is to try out ZFS filesystem send/receive in
>>> >>lieu
>>> >>of
>>> >>our current backup processes based on rsync. Rsync i
Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2013-12-06, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>> and yes, as has been said before, megacli is a rather messy complex
>> command line.
>
> The newer storcli command line tool is slightly less horrifying. There
> are also GUI tools, but I don't have a lot of experience with them.
I
On 6 December 2013 12:53, Nux! wrote:
> On 06.12.2013 12:20, Cian Mc Govern wrote:
>> I believe discard support is only available since kernel 3.1.
>>
>> It'd be great if it was added to RHEL 6 - I'm using Fedora 18 on any
>> machines that require it in the meantime.
>
> Discard has been supported
On 2013-12-06, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> and yes, as has been said before, megacli is a rather messy complex
> command line.
The newer storcli command line tool is slightly less horrifying. There
are also GUI tools, but I don't have a lot of experience with them.
If you have a system drive/arra
The list "pays" very well. It's just that your hosting provider is
regularly or irregularly on it. That's the only reason you think it
doesn't "pay". Not a good reason. It "pays" for everybody else on this
list except you. Consider that. It may even "pay" for you, just that you
don't notice (le
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:47:37 -0500:
>
>> I keep hoping, perhaps foolishly, that others who get hit with this will
>> add their voice, and that the list might go to using some other source
>> to block spam.
>
> Oh, yeah, until the day where that list adds
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:37:29 -0500:
>
>> And here's two thoughts that just struck me: first, they have no way to
>> apply to be whitelisted.
>
> I think there are ways, they do maintain a whitelist. Maybe Hostmonster is
> just not good enough to get on it
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Wes James
>
> > Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes,
> > but the corner trick will have to do.
>
> I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to "move the workspaces under the window".
> But I do not use compiz, s
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Wes James
>
> > Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes,
> > but the corner trick will have to do.
>
> I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to "move the workspaces under the window".
> But I do not use compiz, s
On 12/06/2013 01:51 PM, Igor Littig wrote:
>
> 2013/12/6 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>
>> On 12/06/2013 12:32 PM, Igor Littig wrote:
>>> Oh, yes. I forgot that should be "devel". I installed
>>> libstdc++-devel-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 and compat-libstd and "rpm -qa"
>> shows
>>> that they are installed
>
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:51 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Wes James
>
> > Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes,
> > but the corner trick will have to do.
>
> I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to "move the workspaces under the window".
> But I do not use compiz, s
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:47:37 -0500:
> I keep hoping, perhaps foolishly, that others who get hit with this will
> add their voice, and that the list might go to using some other source to
> block spam.
Oh, yeah, until the day where that list adds Hostmonster as well and
sudd
On 06.12.2013 13:51, John Doe wrote:
> From: Wes James
>
>> Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many
>> panes,
>> but the corner trick will have to do.
>
> I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to "move the workspaces under the
> window".
> But I do not use compiz, so I do
From: Wes James
> Yes, I know... I had gotten used to dragging the apps in the many panes,
> but the corner trick will have to do.
I often use ctrl+alt+shit+arrows to "move the workspaces under the window".
But I do not use compiz, so I do not know if it works with it...
JD
___
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:37:29 -0500:
> And here's two thoughts that just struck me: first, they have no way to
> apply to be whitelisted.
I think there are ways, they do maintain a whitelist. Maybe Hostmonster is
just not good enough to get on it. Did you consider that?
>
From: Igor Littig
> But when I'm installing " libstdc++.i686" I'm getting the
> error
> "Protected multilib versions: libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 !=
> libstdc++-4.4.7-3.el6.x86_64
> "
> Does anybody have ideas how can I work around this problem ?
man yum.conf
protected_multilib Ei
On 12/06/2013 07:58 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> On 06/12/13 12:26, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
about switchboxes
On 06/12/13 12:26, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>> KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
>>> about switchboxes;-)
>>>
>>> Can it be configured to run an actual
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of mark
> Sent: den 6 december 2013 13:35
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions
>
> > We have one really old Dell rack server with a PERC
On 06.12.2013 12:20, Cian Mc Govern wrote:
> I believe discard support is only available since kernel 3.1.
>
> It'd be great if it was added to RHEL 6 - I'm using Fedora 18 on any
> machines that require it in the meantime.
Discard has been supported in EL6 for a long time now!
--
Sent from the
Ok... Sorry...
If I'm doing just "yum install wine" it's installing 64bit wine, which is
useless for me, because most of my windows applications require 32 bit
libraries.
2013/12/6 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
> On 12/06/2013 12:32 PM, Igor Littig wrote:
> > Oh, yes. I forgot that should be "devel". I
On 12/06/13 02:22, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>>
>> I wouldn't recommend the RocketRaid. We have a few of them here; they
>> work ok, but Highpoint, who makes them, are *not* really great about
>> updating
I believe discard support is only available since kernel 3.1.
It'd be great if it was added to RHEL 6 - I'm using Fedora 18 on any
machines that require it in the meantime.
Cian.
On 4 December 2013 21:59, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 04.12.2013 um 19:20 schrieb Akemi Yagi :
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 a
On 12/06/2013 12:32 PM, Igor Littig wrote:
> Oh, yes. I forgot that should be "devel". I installed
> libstdc++-devel-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 and compat-libstd and "rpm -qa" shows
> that they are installed
>
>
> [igor@localhost wine-1.7.3]$ rpm -qa | grep libstdc
> compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-144.el6.i6
> md5sum python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm.*
> 20bb02e6f3b7b71e09dcaff7f3b0ca02
> python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm.64
> d37fe4404a7a5fdb27b29f9b5ed09c73
> python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm.65
Something got mixed up somewhere. The first one (md5 20bb...) is from t
Hello,
when I download python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm from CentOS 6.5
repository the md5sum is different than when I download same file from 6.4.
wget http://msync.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/Packages/
python-slip-dbus-0.2.20-1.el6_2.noarch.rpm
-O python-slip-dbus-0.2.
> However, configure still cannot find the libraries, the same error. Here is
> the full output of configure
Not helpful. The relevant details are in config.log.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento
Oh, yes. I forgot that should be "devel". I installed
libstdc++-devel-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 and compat-libstd and "rpm -qa" shows
that they are installed
[igor@localhost wine-1.7.3]$ rpm -qa | grep libstdc
compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-144.el6.i686
libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:08:05AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> > KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
> > about switchboxes;-)
> >
> > Can it be configured to run an actual Windows partition? (This is how I
> > use Vi
Greetings,
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Igor Littig wrote:
>
> However, I've got "libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686" installed. Maybe "configure"
> search the lbraries in a wrong place ?
>
I am not sure.
But there is something like compat-libstd* which may help.
--
Regards,
Rajagopal
___
Thanks, I was able to upgrade yum by deleting some mirrors which I didn't
need slready. But I still cannot install wine. When I'm running configure
script I'm getting
"checking whether gcc -m32 works... no
configure: error: Cannot build a 32-bit program, you need to install 32-bit
development libr
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
> Sent: den 6 december 2013 08:19
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions
>
> In any case, I sent the thing back to the deale
On 06/12/2013 08:18, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 06/12/13 04:15, Anthony K wrote:
On 06/12/13 01:08, Toralf Lund wrote:
OK. So it's my system.
- Toralf
Not necessarily! I wouldn't worry too much about VirtualBox 4.3 - it is
terribly hosed; I suggest you downgrade back to 4.2.20 which,
Problem is
-- Forwarded message --
From: Igor Littig
Date: 2013/12/6
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 64bit centos and wine
To: Reindl Harald
I've been trying to do "yum upgrade" right now, but I'm getting the same
multilib error with "gnutls" package and it stops
"gnutls-2.8.5-15.el6.x86_64 != gnutl
On 12/6/2013 12:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> KVM? I must admit I haven't even heard of it, except if you are talking
> about switchboxes;-)
>
> Can it be configured to run an actual Windows partition? (This is how I
> use VirtualBox today.)
"Kernel Virtualization Mode" or something. its a hypervis
On 12/6/2013 12:04 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> BIOS... Now when you mention it, I didn't see any message on the screen at
> POST from the raid-card.
> Don't cards like these usually throw a message about setup, raid status, found
> harddrives etc during POST. This one didn't.
the megaraid bios is nast
On 12/06/2013 08:10 AM, Igor Littig wrote:
>
> But when I'm installing " libstdc++.i686" I'm getting the error
>
> "Protected multilib versions: libstdc++-4.4.7-4.el6.i686 !=
> libstdc++-4.4.7-3.el6.x86_64
> "
first do a yum update
___
CentOS mailing l
On 05/12/13 19:08, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>> Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for
>> some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started
>> exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, befo
On 05/12/13 18:50, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/5/2013 5:35 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>> Precisely! An the host being the CentOS 6.5 system. Perhaps I wasn't
>> clear enough about this, although it seemed obvious when I wrote the post.
>>
>> The guest OS really doesn't come into the picture at all, in
On 06/12/13 04:15, Anthony K wrote:
> On 06/12/13 01:08, Toralf Lund wrote:
>> OK. So it's my system.
>>
>> - Toralf
>>
> Not necessarily! I wouldn't worry too much about VirtualBox 4.3 - it is
> terribly hosed; I suggest you downgrade back to 4.2.20 which,
Problem is, I also tried a couple of dif
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 6 december 2013 08:32
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Third-party SATA-RAID cards suggestions
>
> > I see several of you guys say that the Megar
65 matches
Mail list logo
