Im having problems connecting to Hidden WIFI networks on my RHEL 7 beta.
I have an HP Elitebook 2560p.
But if I make the Wireless Access Point visible, im able to connect to it,
and NM is able to save the connection script under
"/sysconfig/network-scripts".
I tried on 3 different Hidden Network
On 12/12/2013 23:23, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article <52aa1175.5060...@gmail.com>, moeinvaz wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded from 6.4 to 6.5, and I don't see mod_fastcgi anymore.
Yum cannot find it to install either. I do have fasttrack repo
added. Any suggestions please?
I don't remember finding it
Hi all!
This isn't anything like urgent, or ultimately even particularly
important, but I find it a curious oddity and thought to in quire if
any of you have thoughts on it...
On my Centos 6.5 box, I have a PATA CDRW drive, and a SATA dvd drive.
when playing a CD in the CDRW drive, every short wh
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:47:40PM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
> Does NM need a gui to configure interfaces, etc.
No, there's some sort of cli tool. Again, I don't use it.
You're still able to get rid of it if desired.
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 12.12.2013 um 22:35 schrieb SilverTip257 :
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Leon Fauster <
> leonfaus...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> that is really an issue for us because we use EL for some small i586 hw
> (router etc.).
> >
> > Ind
Does NM need a gui to configure interfaces, etc.
On 12/12/2013 09:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 12 December 2013 14:06, wrote:
>
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> By the same logic you could argue that a text editor is not required
>>> for a bare minimum --- namely, you can always use cat and echo
Am 12.12.2013 um 22:35 schrieb SilverTip257 :
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
>
>> that is really an issue for us because we use EL for some small i586 hw
>> (router etc.).
>
> Indeed.
> Now RHEL/CentOS won't be able to run on PC Engines ALIX hardware (with PAE
> enable
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> I'd keep the separate firewall, but put it on more efficient hardware.
> You should be able to do this in about 5 W. At 11 cents per kWh, that's
> about $5 per year if it runs continually. I suspect it could actually
> be done in more li
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 11.12.2013 um 17:03 schrieb Alain Péan :
> > Le 11/12/2013 16:56, Karanbir Singh a écrit :
> >> http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/
> >>
> >> Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and
> >> file reports. D
In article <52aa1175.5060...@gmail.com>, moeinvaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded from 6.4 to 6.5, and I don't see mod_fastcgi anymore.
> Yum cannot find it to install either. I do have fasttrack repo
> added. Any suggestions please?
I don't remember finding it in 6.4 either.
I have been using mod_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2013 09:26 AM, Peter wrote:
>
>> I actually do not think you need these, these were all caused by
>> the originally mislabeled system. If you remove your custom
>> policy, I bet it will work fine.
>
> That makes sense. I will try removin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2013 08:20 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 01:49 PM, Peter wrote:
>> On 12/13/2013 02:45 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>>> What SELInux issue did you have? What policy did you need to
>>> add?
>
>> Unfortunately I've misplaced the a
we have CENTOS 5.10 on server. I tried to created bootable CD and have error.
Any ideal?
#mkbootdisk --verbose --iso --device /tmp/boot.iso 2.6.18-371.1.2.el5
Installing isolinux... cp: cannot stat `/usr/lib/syslinux/isolinux.bin': No
such file or directory
done
Copying /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-3
Hi,
I upgraded from 6.4 to 6.5, and I don't see mod_fastcgi anymore.
Yum cannot find it to install either. I do have fasttrack repo
added. Any suggestions please?
-AM
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2013 01:49 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 02:45 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>> What SELInux issue did you have? What policy did you need to add?
>
> Unfortunately I've misplaced the audit logs and report of the problem, but
> this is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2013 02:45 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> What SELInux issue did you have? What policy did you need to add?
Unfortunately I've misplaced the audit logs and report of the problem,
but this is the policy I had to add:
module mypol 1.0;
requi
On 12/12/13 11:17, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 11:03 AM, Peter wrote:
>> I've installed RHEL7 onto a Xen VM running off a CentOS 6 host.
> this is a great test to have done. Would really like to hear comments
> about process and result. I presume this is with the Xen4CentOS stack ?
>
> -
On 12/12/2013 10:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> so you have two layers of network address translation? or is one or
>> >the other of those 'routers' set to bridge ?
> Not exactly: I just have my router in a different 192.168 address space
> than the phone company one. As I said, I plugged the
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 9:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> You misunderstand me: I have the router plugged into the phone co.
>> router, going into my router's uplink port.
>
> so you have two layers of network address translation? or is one or
> the other of those 'routers' set to
On 12/12/2013 9:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> You misunderstand me: I have the router plugged into the phone co. router,
> going into my router's uplink port.
so you have two layers of network address translation? or is one or
the other of those 'routers' set to bridge ?
--
john r pierce
Mike Burger wrote:
>> Mike Burger wrote:
>>> I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
>>>
>>> The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface,
>>> when plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop
>>> system and using my serve
> Mike Burger wrote:
>> I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
>>
>> The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface,
>> when
>> plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop
>> system
>> and using my server as both the serve
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down
some equipment.
I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple
web stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am
considering giving
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
> equipment.
>
> I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
> stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am
On 12/12/2013 09:13, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 12 December 2013 15:32, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/2013 08:56, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the
>>> release upsteam
>>
>> In the aftermath of the CentOS 6.0 trauma, I recall there
You might want to be using some kind of apache benchmark tool such as
ab. Run it every minute or so on very small files and some very large
files and it will give you the relative latency and bandwidth.
On 12 December 2013 16:22, Frank Cox wrote:
> The ISP that I do some occasional work for is pl
On 12/11/2013 22:00, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
> I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
> stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am considering
> giving this server a public IP and plugging it directly into my cable
> modem. This box can handle
The ISP that I do some occasional work for is planning to roll out a new and
much faster Internet service, and as such they will be coming here on Monday to
upgrade my connection so I can test and play with it for a few weeks before
they roll it out for the general public.
It would be convenien
On 12 December 2013 15:32, Warren Young wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 08:56, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >
> > Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the
> > release upsteam
>
> In the aftermath of the CentOS 6.0 trauma, I recall there being
> speculation that building the next majo
Matt Garman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle <
> slackmoeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
>> equipment.
>>
> If you are in the USA, get yourself a Kill-a-Watt power meter. I'm sure
> other parts of
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:00:25PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
>> equipment.
>>
>> I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
>> stuff and Zimbra. I hav
On 12/11/2013 08:56, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the
> release upsteam
In the aftermath of the CentOS 6.0 trauma, I recall there being
speculation that building the next major release wouldn't be as
troublesome, for various reasons[*]
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle <
slackmoeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
> equipment.
>
If you are in the USA, get yourself a Kill-a-Watt power meter. I'm sure
other parts of the world have similar produc
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:00:25PM -0800, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down some
> equipment.
>
> I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web
> stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comc
On 12 December 2013 14:06, wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > By the same logic you could argue that a text editor is not required
> > for a bare minimum --- namely, you can always use cat and echo from the
> > command line to "edit" the config files.
> >
> > The point of the text editor in a mi
Mike Burger wrote:
> I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
>
> The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface, when
> plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop system
> and using my server as both the server and a firew
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:19:26 +1300
> Peter wrote:
>> Right, but core should be just the bare minimum. NetworkManager is
>> certainly not required to configure your network, in fact el7 runs
>> just fine without it. Just set your ifcfg-eth0 scripts, etc, and
>> you're goo
Le 12/12/2013 14:49, Leon Fauster a écrit :
> that is really an issue for us because we use EL for some small i586 hw
> (router etc.).
You can still use CentOS 6 or RHEL 6 (maintained until 2020) ? Or buy a
cheap hardware. They are now all 64 bits.
You cannot say your i586 hw will live this long
Am 11.12.2013 um 17:03 schrieb Alain Péan :
> Le 11/12/2013 16:56, Karanbir Singh a écrit :
>> http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/
>>
>> Go get it ( maybe consider using a mirror ), play with it, test it, and
>> file reports. Dont use it in production.
>>
>> As in the past, we highly encour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2013 06:03 AM, Peter wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 11:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>> The overall aim is to have as many people as possible test the rhel7 beta
>> and file bugs at bugzilla.redhat.com; that way everyone is testing anf
>> doing fee
I used to run everything in a similar manner, behind an IPCop system.
The UVerse gateway doesn't handle multiple IPs on the same interface, when
plugged directly into the gateway, so I wound up ditching the IPCop system
and using my server as both the server and a firewall/router as you're
asking
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:19:26 +1300
Peter wrote:
> Right, but core should be just the bare minimum. NetworkManager is
> certainly not required to configure your network, in fact el7 runs
> just fine without it. Just set your ifcfg-eth0 scripts, etc, and
> you're good to go.
By the same logic you
We have Software Collections for CentOS currently in our testing repo:
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/
To date I don't think I have gotten any feedback, positive or negative,
for these SCL RPMs though I know there are hundreds of people using them
(or at least downloading them).
I have added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter said the following on 12/12/2013 13:19:
> Right, but core should be just the bare minimum. NetworkManager is
> certainly not required to configure your network, in fact el7 runs just
> fine without it. Just set your ifcfg-eth0 scripts, etc,
On 12/13/2013 01:04 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:03:55AM +1300, Peter wrote:
>> On 12/12/2013 11:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>>
>>
>> The core group includes NetworkManager and postfix, neither should be
>> core packages and should be excluded from a core or minimal insta
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:03:55AM +1300, Peter wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 11:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >
>
> The core group includes NetworkManager and postfix, neither should be
> core packages and should be excluded from a core or minimal install.
Fedora, and RedHat, apparently feel that Net
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 12.12.2013 11:27, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Leon Fauster writes in "RHEL 7 Beta is now public":
>> RHEL7 without thunderbird :-(
>
> Speaking of which, the tb-24 update in 5.10 is totally broken. Cannot
> get
> lightning calendar to work all, even after starting with a fresh
> setup.
>
> Ther
On 12/13/2013 12:30 AM, Peter wrote:
> Oh I forgot to mention the other issue, I'm running it under pvgrub (and
> it works fine with a normal grub.conf file, btw, no need to install
> grub2 that way), and I had to regenerate the initramfs, the one supplied
> with the kernel did not come with the xe
On 12/13/2013 12:17 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 11:03 AM, Peter wrote:
>> I've installed RHEL7 onto a Xen VM running off a CentOS 6 host.
>
> this is a great test to have done. Would really like to hear comments
> about process and result. I presume this is with the Xen4CentOS stac
Leon Fauster writes in "RHEL 7 Beta is now public":
> RHEL7 without thunderbird :-(
Speaking of which, the tb-24 update in 5.10 is totally broken. Cannot get
lightning calendar to work all, even after starting with a fresh setup.
There are two calendar toolbars, the New Calendar iitem and nea
On 12.12.2013 05:00, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> So my electricity bill is through the roof and I need to pair down
> some
> equipment.
>
> I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple
> web
> stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am consi
On 12/12/2013 11:03 AM, Peter wrote:
> I've installed RHEL7 onto a Xen VM running off a CentOS 6 host.
this is a great test to have done. Would really like to hear comments
about process and result. I presume this is with the Xen4CentOS stack ?
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://
On 12/12/2013 11:05 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> The overall aim is to have as many people as possible test the rhel7
> beta and file bugs at bugzilla.redhat.com; that way everyone is testing
> anf doing feedback against the same builds, and we all win with a better
> overall end result.
I've in
Good informations. I will testing soon. I think I will installed on Virtualbox
and review.
Nếu có bất cứ vấn đề gì khác, hãy cho chúng tôi biết ngay.
Cám ơn bạn đã liên hệ với bộ phận chăm sóc khách hàng.
Regards,
Công Nghệ VPS - LEVU BIS Co., Ltd
Website : http://congnghevps.net
Email : i...@
Greetings,
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> strategies, start writing docs at wiki.centos.org, start doing migration
+1
Important considering that new critical things like grub2, systemd,
firewalld and the such.
With rhel7 entering many of us will be baby-sitting at le
On 12/12/2013 08:28 AM, Peter wrote:
>> well, they can't even really start until RHEL 7 is a done deal and
>> released. Investing too much effort in porting a beta often is wasted
>> when the final release has structural changes.
>
> Yes, but this seems to indicate otherwise:
>
>> Within Cent
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Johan Vermeulen
> Sent: den 12 december 2013 10:44
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public
>
> just installed it in Vurtualbox. That went fine.
I did t
Le 12/12/2013 10:41, Alain Péan a écrit :
> CentOS 6 has been released in November 2010
Ooops, I meant RHEL 6, of course.
--
Administrateur Système/Réseau
Laboratoire de Photonique et Nanostructures (LPN/CNRS - UPR20)
Centre de Recherche Alcatel Data IV - Marcoussis
route de Nozay - 91460 Marcou
Le 12/12/2013 09:28, Peter a écrit :
>> Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the
>> >release upsteam
> That said, there is, of course, no way to even speculate when CentOS 7
> final will be released until upstream releases 7.
Yes, but experience shows it takes about 6 mo
Op 12-12-13 08:49, Sorin Srbu schreef:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
>> Sent: den 11 december 2013 16:56
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ht
On 12/12/2013 09:16 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 11:49 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> I see nobody's asked when CentOS 7 will be out yet.;-)
>
> well, they can't even really start until RHEL 7 is a done deal and
> released. Investing too much effort in porting a beta often is wasted
> wh
On 12/11/2013 11:49 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> I see nobody's asked when CentOS 7 will be out yet.;-)
well, they can't even really start until RHEL 7 is a done deal and
released. Investing too much effort in porting a beta often is wasted
when the final release has structural changes.
--
joh
63 matches
Mail list logo
