Re: [CentOS] Log rolling with a daemon

2013-12-21 Thread Cliff Pratt
John's suggestion is still pertinent. You'll need a SIGHUP handler in your script. Logrotate could send the SIGHUP in a postrotate 'script'. Cheers, Cliff On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Larry Martell wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 8:52 PM, John R Pierce > wrote: > > On 12/21/2013 4:56 PM,

Re: [CentOS] Log rolling with a daemon

2013-12-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/21/2013 6:15 PM, Larry Martell wrote: > This is not using syslog. If you look at the daemonizing script I gave > the link to, you pass in the log files for stdout and stderr, and it > does some double fork magic and then associates the given files with > them i rarely read links on emails, a

Re: [CentOS] Log rolling with a daemon

2013-12-21 Thread Larry Martell
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 8:52 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/21/2013 4:56 PM, Larry Martell wrote: >> I'm looking for advice or suggestions for rolling log files with a >> daemon. I have a python script that I daemonized with >> http://www.jejik.com/articles/2007/02/a_simple_unix_linux_daemon_in_

Re: [CentOS] Log rolling with a daemon

2013-12-21 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/21/2013 4:56 PM, Larry Martell wrote: > I'm looking for advice or suggestions for rolling log files with a > daemon. I have a python script that I daemonized with > http://www.jejik.com/articles/2007/02/a_simple_unix_linux_daemon_in_python/. > Before I daemonized it it was run from a bash scr

[CentOS] Log rolling with a daemon

2013-12-21 Thread Larry Martell
I'm looking for advice or suggestions for rolling log files with a daemon. I have a python script that I daemonized with http://www.jejik.com/articles/2007/02/a_simple_unix_linux_daemon_in_python/. Before I daemonized it it was run from a bash script that invoked the underlying python script. It ra

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-21 Thread Peter
On 12/22/2013 09:00 AM, Scot P. Floess wrote: > > as much as I hate to admit it, I'm not sure what mono/moonlight are... Linux implementation of Microsoft .net and Silverlight respectively. Silverlight was supposed to be Microsoft's answer to flash which never really took off except in some high

[CentOS] Serial Console Config in 6.5

2013-12-21 Thread Camron W. Fox
Alle, After upgrading from 6.4 to 6.5, our serial console configuration non longer work. We have the following upstart file: [cwfox@hilo ~]$ cat /etc/init/ttyS0.conf # ttyS0 - agetty # # This service maintains a agetty on ttyS0. stop on runlevel [S016] start on runlevel [23] respawn exe

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-21 Thread Fabrizio Di Carlo
I'm using too in these hours, 4-5 hours, no crash, and finally also the site of MVA works with Chrome :) Fabrizio On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Scot P. Floess wrote: > > Dave, > > To be honest, I never tried - as much as I hate to admit it, I'm not sure > what mono/moonlight are... > > But

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-21 Thread Scot P. Floess
Dave, To be honest, I never tried - as much as I hate to admit it, I'm not sure what mono/moonlight are... But I've had Chrome working for me for at least 6 months if not a year and it works fine (I'm not on CentOS 6.5)... Thanks, Flossy On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, David G. Miller wrote: > Scot

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-21 Thread David G . Miller
Scot P. Floess writes: > > > All, > > I don't know if this will help y'all, but I have gotten Chrome working > with CentOS 6.x: > > http://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedora-linux/ > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Kwan Lowe wrote: > > > No consolation for CentOS 6, but C

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/21/2013 04:14 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote: >>> Well, turns out it was more than a rumour. Here it is, some test >>> version: >>> >>> http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ >>> >> I would recommend trying those RPMs .. I will see if I can get it to >> build and get it into my chromium soon.

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-21 Thread Nux!
On 20.12.2013 21:14, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Robert Arkiletian >> wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know of secret plans to eventually support >>> Chrome/Chromium >>> on C6? (crossing fingers) >> >> I heard a rumour ab

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 106, Issue 13

2013-12-21 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-21 Thread Александр Кириллов
>> Well, turns out it was more than a rumour. Here it is, some test >> version: >> >> http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ >> > > I would recommend trying those RPMs .. I will see if I can get it to > build and get it into my chromium soon. FYI chromium-31.0.1650.63-1.el6_5.src.rpm builds (i