CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0096
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0096.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0097 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0097.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0097 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0097.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Buenos dias listeros
Tengo un proyecto para montar un servidor de correo para una empresa
de aproximadamente 100 usuarios con sus cuentas de correo con clientes
en windows. Quisiera montarles ese servidor de correo bajo centos pero
no estoy muy familiarizado con este servicios de correo, he leido
Hola a tod@s.
He tenido el servidor bajo ataque de spam. Usaron una cuenta válida con
usuario y contraseña que capturaron desde un equipo window y con outlook al
cual le metieron un troyano y se hicieron con la configuración.
El envio masivo se produjo desde Ucrania, y no hay usuarios ni clientes
Hola.
Por el tipo de ataque que describes de poco serviría hacer una
restricción por localización geográfica.
De todas formas efectivamente necesitarás usar el módulo de geoip que
está disponible para iptables. Esta guía puede serte de utilidad:
Ese tema me lo plantee yo hace unos meses, después de que a un usuario le
hackeasen la clave.
Pero yo no podía bloquear por países, pues hoy día casi todo el mundo tiene el
correo en el móvil, y
cuando viajan, pues se conectan desde cualquier país para leer el correo.
Mi solución:
1.- Un
El sistema más completo para mi es este:
http://www.campworld.net/thewiki/pmwiki.php/LinuxServersCentOS/Cent6VirtMailServer
Así monte yo mi servidor, solo que añadi la variable Horde5
Saludos,
David
El día 27 de enero de 2014, 11:13, Carlos Garcia
cgarcia01...@gmail.com escribió:
Buenos dias
I've got a 1Tb USB disc that appears to be dying - eg it took about 10 days
(!) to run 'badblocks -nsv /dev/sdc' and it only did less than 2% in that
time. Read access became _really_ slow.
So there's definitely something amiss and I've got it offline.
There's no drama about the content as I
Thanks
But the way I understand it, please correct me if I´m wrong.
Before you can do the ¨wvdial¨ command, you firs need to get a ¨ttyUSB¨
device created.
My issue here is that I do not get to the ¨ttyUSB¨ device.
Regards
On 01/27/2014 07:14 AM, Mihamina RKTMB wrote:
On 01/26/2014 10:36 PM,
Hello All,
I am facing a strange issue, I use eclipse and I was using Ubuntu
earlier, Now I am trying with Centos. As in my Ubuntu i Can find my
share in ~/.gvfs.
but now I am unable to locate the same in Centos(release 6.5 Final). I
have also checked /var/run/ and I dont have /run in my
On 2014-01-27, anant.saras...@techblue.co.uk anant.saras...@techblue.co.uk
wrote:
Hello All,
I am facing a strange issue, I use eclipse and I was using Ubuntu
earlier, Now I am trying with Centos. As in my Ubuntu i Can find my
share in ~/.gvfs.
but now I am unable to locate the same in
On 2014-01-25, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
On Centos 6.5, I use NM to bring up the VPN to my office, and to disconnect
from it.
every now and then I screw up and disconnect the LAN itself instead of
the VPN.
once I do that, even after reconnecting to the LAN I'm hosed.
I've seen similar cases where a USB drive appears to fail but the SMART
reports success. The most recent was a 500 GB disk which had internally
a Seagate Barracuda SATA drive. It appeared to work well until I sent
it
a largish (7GB) tarball. As well as SMART I ran a surface check and
exercise,
On 01/27/2014 09:11 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
# 1 Extended offlineCompleted: read failure 90% 14545
1141581559
If the test fails after 10% and it were my disk I would buy a new one.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
On Monday 27 January 2014 03:36 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2014-01-27, anant.saras...@techblue.co.uk anant.saras...@techblue.co.uk
wrote:
Hello All,
I am facing a strange issue, I use eclipse and I was using Ubuntu
earlier, Now I am trying with Centos. As in my Ubuntu i Can find my
share
I have a rule in iptables to drop certain packets from addresses, like:
iptables --list | grep 37
DROP all -- 37.0.0.0/8 anywhere
So I am wondering how this got through???
[Jan 27 02:36:52] NOTICE[9298][C-05ce] chan_sip.c: Call from '' (
37.8.28.217:10024) to extension
I have a rule in iptables to drop certain packets from addresses, like:
iptables --list | grep 37
DROP all -- 37.0.0.0/8 anywhere
So I am wondering how this got through???
[Jan 27 02:36:52] NOTICE[9298][C-05ce] chan_sip.c: Call from '' (
37.8.28.217:10024) to
Is network manager available during Gnome login?
Users (using laptops etc) need to authenticate and login having their home
directory on NFS using autofs.
However this is not possible when there is no valid network connection
present; either using Wireless LAN or VPN
Is network manager available during Gnome login?
Users (using laptops etc) need to authenticate and login having their home
directory on NFS using autofs.
However this is not possible when there is no valid network connection
present; either using Wireless LAN or VPN
In the Gnome
On 01/27/2014 02:43 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a rule in iptables to drop certain packets from addresses, like:
iptables --list | grep 37
DROP all -- 37.0.0.0/8 anywhere
So I am wondering how this got through???
[Jan 27 02:36:52] NOTICE[9298][C-05ce]
On 27-01-14 11:37, Rushton Martin wrote:
I can't test further, the disk has been broken up for destruction, but I
wonder if the problem is the disk or the USB/SATA conversion board?
If the USB disk also has an eSATA port, use that one and test again. If
it doesn't have an eSATA port then I
On 27-01-14 13:32, Jerry Geis wrote:
I have a rule in iptables to drop certain packets from addresses, like:
iptables --list | grep 37
DROP all -- 37.0.0.0/8 anywhere
So I am wondering how this got through???
[Jan 27 02:36:52] NOTICE[9298][C-05ce] chan_sip.c: Call
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Matt matt.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on input from everyone here I am thinking of an alternate setup.
Single small inexpensive 64GB SSD used as /boot, / and swap. Putting
/vz on software RAID1 array on the two 4TB drives. I can likely just
zip tie
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Bob Hepple wrote:
I've got a 1Tb USB disc that appears to be dying - eg it took about
10 days (!) to run 'badblocks -nsv /dev/sdc' and it only did less
than 2% in that time. Read access became _really_ slow.
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 192 192 000Old_age
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Matt matt.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on input from everyone here I am thinking of an alternate setup.
Single small inexpensive 64GB SSD used as /boot, / and swap. Putting
/vz on software RAID1 array on the two 4TB drives. I can
On 01/27/2014 03:22 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 03:18 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Hi.
I have updated system/server that worked for a long time. It was upgrade
from 6.4 to latest.
After restart, system freezes after most/all of the daemons are booted.
From
I installed Centos 6.x 64 bit with the minimal ISO and used two disks
in RAID 1 array.
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2 97G 918M 91G 1% /
tmpfs16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/md1485M 54M 407M 12% /boot
/dev/md33.4T
On 01/27/2014 04:26 PM, Matt wrote:
I installed Centos 6.x 64 bit with the minimal ISO and used two disks
in RAID 1 array.
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2 97G 918M 91G 1% /
tmpfs16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/md1485M 54M 407M
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rswrote:
Hi.
I have updated system/server that worked for a long time. It was upgrade
from 6.4 to latest.
After restart, system freezes after most/all of the daemons are booted.
From interactive mode I found out that
On 01/27/2014 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 03:53 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
ls /etc/rc5.d/S*
Yeah, thanks.
I managed to find out X server is a culprit (system is server with
Virtual Windows accessed remotely but has X system in place).
Funny thing is that startx (from
On 01/27/2014 03:53 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
ls /etc/rc5.d/S*
Yeah, thanks.
I managed to find out X server is a culprit (system is server with
Virtual Windows accessed remotely but has X system in place).
Funny thing is that startx (from init 3) does not write to the X.org.log
at all.
Well,
Based on input from everyone here I am thinking of an alternate setup.
Single small inexpensive 64GB SSD used as /boot, / and swap. Putting
/vz on software RAID1 array on the two 4TB drives. I can likely just
zip tie the SSD in the 1u case somewhere since I have no more drive
bays. Does
Hi.
I have updated system/server that worked for a long time. It was upgrade
from 6.4 to latest.
After restart, system freezes after most/all of the daemons are booted.
From interactive mode I found out that services starting are:
...
...
atd
jexec
atieventsd
libvirtd
certmonger
On 01/27/2014 03:18 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Hi.
I have updated system/server that worked for a long time. It was upgrade
from 6.4 to latest.
After restart, system freezes after most/all of the daemons are booted.
From interactive mode I found out that services starting are:
...
On 01/27/2014 04:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 03:53 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
ls /etc/rc5.d/S*
Yeah, thanks.
I managed to find out X server is a culprit (system is server with
Virtual Windows accessed remotely but has X
From: Matt matt.mailingli...@gmail.com
I am thinking I will not have much I/O traffic on the SSD hopefully
extending its lifespan. If it dies I will just need to reinstall
Centos on a replacement SSD. My critical files will be in /vz that I
need backup on and I think RAID1 will give me
On 01/27/2014 05:46 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 01/27/2014 04:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 03:53 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
ls /etc/rc5.d/S*
Yeah, thanks.
I managed to find out X server is a culprit (system is
On 01/27/2014 05:50 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 01/27/2014 05:46 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
On 01/27/2014 04:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/27/2014 03:53 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
ls /etc/rc5.d/S*
Yeah, thanks.
I
On 01/27/2014 05:45 PM, John Doe wrote:
From: Matt matt.mailingli...@gmail.com
I am thinking I will not have much I/O traffic on the SSD hopefully
extending its lifespan. If it dies I will just need to reinstall
Centos on a replacement SSD. My critical files will be in /vz that I
need
On 01/27/2014 06:31 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I've just installed centos 6.4 from a live spin I had but can't get it
to install yumex or xfce for that matter.
What is the secret? Or can it not be done ...
Bob
You need 3rd party repositories. For these two you need EPEL.
I've just installed centos 6.4 from a live spin I had but can't get it
to install yumex or xfce for that matter.
What is the secret? Or can it not be done ...
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/w2bod
Box10 Fedora-20/64bit Linux/XFCE
___
CentOS mailing
On 27 January 2014 @17:31 zulu, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I've just installed centos 6.4 from a live spin I had but can't get it
to install yumex or xfce for that matter.
What is the secret? Or can it not be done ...
Bob
The secret is giving the list more detail, not just
On 27/01/14 12:44, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
You need 3rd party repositories. For these two you need EPEL.
Yes, I know that from Google but I need to know where and how to get it?
I first downloaded 6.5 minimal but could never get it connected to my
Ethernet/LAN!
So I downloaded 6.5 DVD [2
On 01/27/2014 07:09 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 27/01/14 12:55, Darr247 wrote:
The secret is giving the list more detail, not just saying can't get it
to install xyz...:)
e.g. what is the output you get from
# yum install yumex
Well, now it is finally trying to work. I
On 27/01/14 12:55, Darr247 wrote:
The secret is giving the list more detail, not just saying can't get it
to install xyz...:)
e.g. what is the output you get from
# yum install yumex
Well, now it is finally trying to work. I had been trying earlier
without success?
However it produces a
On 01/24/2014 06:58 PM, Matt wrote:
I installed Centos 6.x 64 bit with the minimal ISO and used two disks
in RAID 1 array.
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2 97G 918M 91G 1% /
tmpfs16G 0 16G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/md1485M 54M
On 27/01/14 13:20, Jitse Klomp wrote:
Do you have a working internet/network connection in VirtualBox?
- Jitse
Yes, I have a good high speed connection.
And the yumex problems have cleared! I tried again and everything
appears to be working, dunno why? It is currently installing XFCE.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
for quite some time (since 5.x era) i use
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Install_On_Partitionable_RAID1
(with 6.x i don't even need the patch to mkinitrd)
the mbr or whatever it is is written in /dev/md_d0 .. and
On 01/27/2014 08:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
for quite some time (since 5.x era) i use
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Install_On_Partitionable_RAID1
(with 6.x i don't even need the patch to mkinitrd)
the mbr or
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
On 01/27/2014 08:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
for quite some time (since 5.x era) i use
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Install_On_Partitionable_RAID1
(with 6.x i don't even need the patch to
2014-01-27 Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
Is network manager available during Gnome login?
Users (using laptops etc) need to authenticate and login having their
home
directory on NFS using autofs.
However this is not possible when there is no valid network connection
I have a ATI Radeon X1300 video card installed in a ThinkPad Advanced
Docking Station where the laptop runs Centos 6.5.
Upon Googling it seems that Centos 6.4 broke compatibility with the
kmod-fglrx-legacy driver and that the only way around it is to downgrade
X to an older version. However,
On 01/27/2014 10:07 PM, H wrote:
I have a ATI Radeon X1300 video card installed in a ThinkPad Advanced
Docking Station where the laptop runs Centos 6.5.
Upon Googling it seems that Centos 6.4 broke compatibility with the
kmod-fglrx-legacy driver and that the only way around it is to downgrade
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
On 01/27/2014 08:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
for quite some time (since 5.x era) i use
Hi.
I had to replace a disk that was part of a mirrored pare attached to Intel
Corporation 82801 SATA RAID Controller At boot the raid bios says that the
rebuild with take place within the OS. Bit disk activity seems very low.
How can I tell the progress of the rebuild ?
Thanks
G
On 01/27/2014 09:41 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
And the yumex problems have cleared! I tried again and everything
appears to be working, dunno why?
In fact, nothinf was broken.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Paul Heinlein heinlein@... writes:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Bob Hepple wrote:
I've got a 1Tb USB disc that appears to be dying - eg it took about
10 days (!) to run 'badblocks -nsv /dev/sdc' and it only did less
than 2% in that time. Read access became _really_ slow.
197
58 matches
Mail list logo
