Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2014-02-04 Thread Robert Arkiletian
new potential remote code exploit in Chromium flash. http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.html Doesn't look like these repos are being updated. http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/ Any info on this issue would be wel

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading Perl (modules) / RequestTracker

2014-02-04 Thread Chris
Well, it seems you have to install RT manually on CentOS 6 [1]. On 02/05/2014 12:33 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > I have no experience with Debian/Ubuntu, but I’d really only use > packages in case I could package them up myself, specifically for > this task. For Debian, there are packages readily

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Bane Ivosev
yeah. my apologies too. didn't saw it. fresh problem & busy tuesday. On 02/04/2014 02:50 PM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > > op 04-02-14 14:42, Mike Burger schreef: >> Don't assume that just because someone inquired about the same problem for >> which you've inquired that they're "/not/ seeing" your e

Re: [CentOS] virtualisation

2014-02-04 Thread David Beveridge
I've run proxmox as a VMware guest on esx and it allows openvz guests inside proxmox, but not KVM. Dave On 5 Feb 2014 11:49, "Yanis Guenane" wrote: > > On 02/04/2014 02:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 2/3/2014 1:31 PM, Ridhwaan Mayet wrote: > >> I run a small company and I would like to virtu

Re: [CentOS] virtualisation

2014-02-04 Thread Yanis Guenane
On 02/04/2014 02:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/3/2014 1:31 PM, Ridhwaan Mayet wrote: >> I run a small company and I would like to virtualise our setup. My internet >> provider offers a cloud server running CentOS. The server is managed by >> vmware software, they haven't been able to tell me

Re: [CentOS] virtualisation

2014-02-04 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 02/04/2014 01:01 AM, Digimer wrote: > Virtual Machine Manager (virt-manager is the package name) is a nice and > easy to use GUI for creating, modifying and deleting virtual servers on > CentOS. It uses the KVM hypervisor by default, which "just works". > > I'd strongly recommend giving it a

Re: [CentOS] Upgrading Perl (modules) / RequestTracker

2014-02-04 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 04.02.2014 um 22:49 schrieb Michael Mol : > I'm attempting to install RequestTracker on CentOS 6.5. Running "make > testdeps" as recommended by RT's installation guide, I'm presented with > lists of missing Perl modules. > > One of these lines reads: > >Encode >= 2.39 ...MISSING > >

Re: [CentOS] nautilus[3920]: segfault ( used to be : Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0127 Moderate CentOS 6 librsvg2 Update )

2014-02-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > Yes, it's a bug. See > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414 The fixed version librsvg2-devel-2.26.0-6.el6_5.3 is syncing to the mirrors. Akemi _

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > > > On 02/04/2014 10:32 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > temporary solution > > yum downgrade librsvg2 >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414

[CentOS] Upgrading Perl (modules) / RequestTracker

2014-02-04 Thread Michael Mol
I'm attempting to install RequestTracker on CentOS 6.5. Running "make testdeps" as recommended by RT's installation guide, I'm presented with lists of missing Perl modules. One of these lines reads: Encode >= 2.39 ...MISSING Now, "yum whatprovides '*/Encode.pm' " informs me that that mo

Re: [CentOS] died again

2014-02-04 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Well just a note that sometimes CPU and other parts overload can cause a similar effect while newer software might offer better stability based on some sensors in the MB. All The Bests, Eliezer On 11/25/2013 07:45 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > CentOS 6.4 died on me again. > Didn't leave any tra

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Phelps, Matt
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg < nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote: > > > On 02/04/2014 10:32 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > >> FYI: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085 > >> > >> > >> On 02/04/2

Re: [CentOS] odd automount issue

2014-02-04 Thread m . roth
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > We're seeing, in the log, automount trying (and failing) to mount a few > directories NFS in the middle of the night. For example: > 03:49:50 automount[7872]: key "httpd" not found in > map source(s) > > It doesn't seem to be triggered by the pen testers, nor by logs (I t

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
On 02/04/2014 10:32 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> FYI: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085 >> >> >> On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: >>> >>> op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef: after morning update of

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Phelps, Matt
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > FYI: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085 > > > On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > > > > op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef: > >> after morning update of librsvg2 > >> > >> Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2

Re: [CentOS] 6.5 single user mode

2014-02-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> >>> I want to boot into single user mode and run a script automatically. >> >> >> How often - every time, or just once? If every time, create a script and >> put it in /etc/init.d/, with a link to /etc/rc1.d, or use whatever it is >> in syst

Re: [CentOS] nautilus[3920]: segfault ( used to be : Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0127 Moderate CentOS 6 librsvg2 Update )

2014-02-04 Thread Phelps, Matt
Yes, it's a bug. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414 Fixed upstream. On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > > op 04-02-14 11:03, Johan Vermeulen schreef: > > op 04-02-14 06:35, Johnny Hughes schreef: >

Re: [CentOS] Experience with BTRFS?

2014-02-04 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > 3.14 does not matter at all in context of RHEL > 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64 is not a pure 2.6.32 kernel > I understand that but since Oracle Linux is a RHEL derivative like CentOS ... I wanted to mention the OL Playground repo... It doesn´t c

Re: [CentOS] NFS not recognizing available file space

2014-02-04 Thread James A. Peltier
change mount to nobarrier,inode64,delaylog - Original Message - | | Hi: | | > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Pat Haley wrote: | > | >> Hi, | >> | >> I have a server running under CentOS 5.8 and I appear to be in a | >> situation in which the NFS file server is not recognizing the | >>

[CentOS] odd automount issue

2014-02-04 Thread m . roth
We're seeing, in the log, automount trying (and failing) to mount a few directories NFS in the middle of the night. For example: 03:49:50 automount[7872]: key "httpd" not found in map source(s) It doesn't seem to be triggered by the pen testers, nor by logs (I think), so we're all at a loss to gu

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Jim Perrin
FYI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085 On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > > op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef: >> after morning update of librsvg2 >> >> Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64 >> >> nautilus crashed with >> >> nautilus[3419

Re: [CentOS] 6.5 single user mode

2014-02-04 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/04/2014 03:17 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Steve Clark wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> I want to boot into single user mode and run a script automatically. > > > How often - every time, or just once? If every time, create a script and > put it in /etc/init.d/, with a link to /etc/rc1.d, or use

Re: [CentOS] 6.5 single user mode

2014-02-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > Hello List, > > I want to boot into single user mode and run a script automatically. > > I have been looking for a couple of hours and have found one solution I don't > like. > > How can I get the shell that is started in single user mode to ru

Re: [CentOS] Experience with BTRFS?

2014-02-04 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Lists wrote: > . It would seem that BTRFS is slightly more flexible than > ZFS, EG the ability to add RAID-levels for improved redundancy after > initial creation without taking the system(s) offline. > Indeed. Check this out A tour of BTRFS http://www.youtube.com

Re: [CentOS] 6.5 single user mode

2014-02-04 Thread m . roth
Steve Clark wrote: > Hello List, > > I want to boot into single user mode and run a script automatically. How often - every time, or just once? If every time, create a script and put it in /etc/init.d/, with a link to /etc/rc1.d, or use whatever it is in systemd's analog. mark _

Re: [CentOS] I want to ask about some Kernel level operations.

2014-02-04 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 2/4/2014 2:57 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/4/2014 9:15 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> On 1/1/2014 6:53 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >>> I want to make sure that while compiling as root nothing will break down >>> inside the machine. >> The basic issue is limiting your exposure in the case of a pro

[CentOS] Experience with BTRFS?

2014-02-04 Thread Lists
Was wondering if anyone here could weigh in on using BTRFS for CentOS 6 in a "near production" environment? I've been using ZFS on Linux and am very happy with the results so far, but don't particularly want to put all my eggs in one basket. Our application architecture allows us to have multip

Re: [CentOS] 6.5 single user mode

2014-02-04 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 03:04:05PM -0500, Steve Clark wrote: > Hello List, > > I want to boot into single user mode and run a script automatically. > > I have been looking for a couple of hours and have found one solution I don't > like. > > How can I get the shell that is started in single use

[CentOS] 6.5 single user mode

2014-02-04 Thread Steve Clark
Hello List, I want to boot into single user mode and run a script automatically. I have been looking for a couple of hours and have found one solution I don't like. How can I get the shell that is started in single user mode to run a script. My one solution was to add a profile in /etc/profile

Re: [CentOS] NFS not recognizing available file space

2014-02-04 Thread Pat Haley
Hi: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Pat Haley wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have a server running under CentOS 5.8 and I appear to be in a >> situation in which the NFS file server is not recognizing the available >> space on a particular disk (actually a hardware RAID-6 of 13 2Tb disks). >> If I t

Re: [CentOS] I want to ask about some Kernel level operations.

2014-02-04 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/4/2014 9:15 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 1/1/2014 6:53 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: >> I want to make sure that while compiling as root nothing will break down >> inside the machine. > The basic issue is limiting your exposure in the case of a problem. this is a month old thread, that was hamm

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:03:42 +0100 Bane Ivosev wrote: > after morning update of librsvg2 > Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64 > nautilus crashed with > nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 7f68b2d2733c sp 7fffe2ce04f0 > error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000

Re: [CentOS] NFS not recognizing available file space

2014-02-04 Thread SilverTip257
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Pat Haley wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a server running under CentOS 5.8 and I appear to be in a > situation in which the NFS file server is not recognizing the available > space on a particular disk (actually a hardware RAID-6 of 13 2Tb disks). > If I try to write to

[CentOS] NFS not recognizing available file space

2014-02-04 Thread Pat Haley
Hi, I have a server running under CentOS 5.8 and I appear to be in a situation in which the NFS file server is not recognizing the available space on a particular disk (actually a hardware RAID-6 of 13 2Tb disks). If I try to write to the disk I get the following error message [root@nas-0-1 msea

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:43:27AM -0800, John Doe wrote: > From: Fred Smith > > > so, Firefox has spawned a ton of child threads, and some of them appear > > in top as "Image Decoder #x". I dunno WHY they have a strange name, > > but at least I now know where they came from. > > Maybe webkit's

Re: [CentOS] I want to ask about some Kernel level operations.

2014-02-04 Thread Bowie Bailey
On 1/1/2014 6:53 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > I want to make sure that while compiling as root nothing will break down > inside the machine. > > I want to compile software on a Xeon SERVER. > The basic issue is that there is a recommendation to not compile it as a > root user. > > I have compiled

[CentOS] [OT] ssh and security DVR

2014-02-04 Thread m . roth
Does anyone have any "security appliance" DVR, and can you a) telnet or b) ssh into it? Also, I have read that on a lot of the low-end ones, like Swann, port 9000 is completely open, but it's not clear to me from the hack post

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread John Doe
From: Fred Smith > so, Firefox has spawned a ton of child threads, and some of them appear > in top as "Image Decoder #x". I dunno WHY they have a strange name, > but at least I now know where they came from. Maybe webkit's ImageDecoder "function"... JD _

Re: [CentOS] Memory leak - how to investigate

2014-02-04 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:53 AM, sjt5atra wrote: > > > Others have mentioned tuning httpd.conf parameters. Problem is apache > doesn't give you the math to know what to set those without lots of > trial-and-error. The best guide for this math is from F5: > http://www.f5.com/pdf/deployment-guides/

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread m . roth
Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:31:51PM +, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: >> Fred Smith a écrit : >> >> > Um, it appears in the process list as "ImageDecoder". I don't know how >> > one would determine that it's java or not. > here's some output from top (with ppid and thread id add

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:31:51PM +, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: > > Fred Smith a écrit : > > > > > Um, it appears in the process list as "ImageDecoder". I don't know how > > one would determine that it's java or not. > > > > Can you give me a hint? > > Try pstree ? pstree shows nothing by

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread m . roth
Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:26:32AM -0800, John Doe wrote: >> From: Fred Smith >> >> > I'm suddenly noticing multiple threads named "ImageDecoder" >> > showing up in the output of top (when threads are turned >> > on with "H"). I've no clue what this is, and haven't found out mu

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread Laurent Wandrebeck
Fred Smith a écrit : > > Um, it appears in the process list as "ImageDecoder". I don't know how > one would determine that it's java or not. > > Can you give me a hint? Try pstree ? HTH, Laurent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:26:32AM -0800, John Doe wrote: > From: Fred Smith > > > I'm suddenly noticing multiple threads named "ImageDecoder" > > showing up in the output of top (when threads are turned > > on with "H"). > > I've no clue what this is, and haven't found out much about it by > >

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Mike Burger
Don't assume that just because someone inquired about the same problem for which you've inquired that they're "/not/ seeing" your emails. It could simply be that they didn't read *every* email that's come through the list in the last few hours, so they didn't see yours. Chill. -- Mike Burger http

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Johan Vermeulen
op 04-02-14 14:42, Mike Burger schreef: > Don't assume that just because someone inquired about the same problem for > which you've inquired that they're "/not/ seeing" your emails. It could > simply be that they didn't read *every* email that's come through the list > in the last few hours, so th

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Johan Vermeulen
op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef: > after morning update of librsvg2 > > Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64 > > nautilus crashed with > > nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 7f68b2d2733c sp 7fffe2ce04f0 > error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000] > > > t

[CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

2014-02-04 Thread Bane Ivosev
after morning update of librsvg2 Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2.26.0-6.el6_5.2.x86_64 nautilus crashed with nautilus[3419]: segfault at 21 ip 7f68b2d2733c sp 7fffe2ce04f0 error 4 in librsvg-2.so.2.26.0[7f68b2d01000+37000] temporary solution yum downgrade librsvg2 signature.a

Re: [CentOS] Memory leak - how to investigate

2014-02-04 Thread sjt5atra
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:46 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > >> On 3.2.2014 19.58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> That's a*lot* of apache. Is that really correct? Do you really need that >> many threads? How heavily is the webserver used? > > Is this a good measure? At least it's exact. :-) > # du -sh /var

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 2

2014-02-04 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Password hash rounds solved - important security implications

2014-02-04 Thread george . shaffer
A member of the scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov wrote: On 01/14/2014 04:19 PM, George Shaffer wrote: > > If anyone has gotten password hash rounds using hash_rounds_min and > > hash_rounds_max in libuser.conf, or the counter part in login.defs > > (SHA_CRYPT_MIN_ROUNDS, SHA_CRYPT_MAX_ROUNDS), to w

Re: [CentOS] Missing Announcement

2014-02-04 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 02/04/2014 11:53 AM, Jake Shipton wrote: > On 02/02/14 03:06, Markus Falb wrote: >> Hi, >> I do see a kernel update to 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5 but I am missing the >> announcement. >> > Hi, > > It did get sent, just checked my announce folder (on another email) and > it is there. > > Also: > https:/

[CentOS] nautilus[3920]: segfault ( used to be : Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0127 Moderate CentOS 6 librsvg2 Update )

2014-02-04 Thread Johan Vermeulen
op 04-02-14 11:03, Johan Vermeulen schreef: > op 04-02-14 06:35, Johnny Hughes schreef: >> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0127 Moderate >> >> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0127.html >> >> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently >>

Re: [CentOS] Missing Announcement

2014-02-04 Thread Jake Shipton
On 02/02/14 03:06, Markus Falb wrote: > Hi, > I do see a kernel update to 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5 but I am missing the > announcement. > Hi, It did get sent, just checked my announce folder (on another email) and it is there. Also: https://lwn.net/Articles/583977/ Kind Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeM

Re: [CentOS] what is: ImageDecoder

2014-02-04 Thread John Doe
From: Fred Smith > I'm suddenly noticing multiple threads named "ImageDecoder" > showing up in the output of top (when threads are turned > on with "H"). > I've no clue what this is, and haven't found out much about it by > searching. > Can someone tell me what it is, and if it's doing anything

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0127 Moderate CentOS 6 librsvg2 Update

2014-02-04 Thread Johan Vermeulen
op 04-02-14 06:35, Johnny Hughes schreef: > CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0127 Moderate > > Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0127.html > > The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently > syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) > > i

Re: [CentOS] Memory leak - how to investigate

2014-02-04 Thread Jussi Hirvi
On 3.2.2014 19.58, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > That's a*lot* of apache. Is that really correct? Do you really need that > many threads? How heavily is the webserver used? Is this a good measure? At least it's exact. :-) # du -sh /var/log/httpd 261M/var/log/httpd Those logs are rotated with def