On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 22:49 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> can you reboot this system, then paste a copy of dmesg immediately after
> it finishes booting ?
>
>
>
I found it. Stupid me. I reserved 4096M for crash dumps.
Thanks.
Joe
___
CentOS mailing
Hi Guys,
It is surprised that VMware-tools gives 4 options only for resolutin after
I install VMware-tools for CentOS release 5.10 (Final), a guest OS running
with VMware player 6.0.1 build-1379776. The kernal is 2.6.18-371.4.1.el5
x86_64 x86_64. The host system is win7 64bit OS. The hardware is T
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:46 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:33 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:09 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
> > GiB of RAM when I actually have 1638
can you reboot this system, then paste a copy of dmesg immediately after
it finishes booting ?
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:33 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:09 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
> GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
> mem=xxM to the end of the
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:33 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:09 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >>> I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
> >>> GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
> >>> mem=xxM to the end of the k
> On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:09 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
>>> I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
>>> GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
>>> mem=xxM to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf. The result is the
>>> same. Any sugges
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 00:09 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
> > GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
> > mem=xxM to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf. The result is the
> > same. Any suggesti
> I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
> GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
> mem=xxM to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf. The result is the
> same. Any suggestions?
Is this a Dell or other major server vendor system that h
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 21:48 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/16/2014 9:38 PM, Joseph Godino wrote:
> > I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
> > GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
> > mem=xxM to the end of the kernel line in grub.
On 2/16/2014 9:38 PM, Joseph Godino wrote:
> I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
> GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
> mem=xxM to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf. The result is the
> same. Any suggestions?
this is a 64bi
Hello All,
I noticed that my CentOS 6.5 system reports that I only have about 10.9
GiB of RAM when I actually have 16384M. I have already tried adding
mem=xxM to the end of the kernel line in grub.conf. The result is the
same. Any suggestions?
Joe
___
On 2/16/2014 8:26 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> A server has FakeRAID installed, I want to remove it to make it mdadm driven
>
>
> If I delete the FakeRAID including
>
> - disabling it in the BIOS
> - removing the dmraid driver from initrd
the dmraid driver is really not functionally d
Hi
A server has FakeRAID installed, I want to remove it to make it mdadm driven
If I delete the FakeRAID including
- disabling it in the BIOS
- removing the dmraid driver from initrd
- deleting all meta data from partitions
- deleting all dmraid packages
is the data still available on
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, g wrote:
> On 02/11/2014 04:08 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> What surprises me is that its current mechanical
>> arrangement corresponds to its orignal design.
>> To me, the radiator seemed to have fallen down.
>> For all I knew, it might have been held up by persuasion.
>
>
Answers to questions...
It really depends on your use case.
I'm looking to be able to pull out old dead drive, and replace it with
new (almost up to date) drive and reboot.
The USB disk is a 1TB disk in a case.
> Been considering dump and restoring to the usb disk periodically? or
> maybe somet
> OK, the original CentOS mirror does not make any changes to that :-(
>
> Is there any way I can debug these kernel panics?
> The hardware I'm testing on is definetily working well (Memtest did not
> find any errors, besides that, this machine is using ECC RAM) and as
> mentioned, no other machin
OK, the original CentOS mirror does not make any changes to that :-(
Is there any way I can debug these kernel panics?
The hardware I'm testing on is definetily working well (Memtest did not
find any errors, besides that, this machine is using ECC RAM) and as
mentioned, no other machine on this ho
On 16 February 2014 @14:27 zulu, Darr247 wrote:
> downloads that package
should be
"downloads a missing package"
Sorry. :-|
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 16 February 2014 @11:10 zulu, Giorgio Bersano wrote:
> Student: "Can we run Chrome?"
> Me: "Well, in his farsighted view Google decided it is uninterested
> to have it running on the prominent linux enterprise distribution.
> It worked in the past but after version 31 they made it impossible to
I tested one KVM machine - but this problem occured on several different
hardwares, most of them are running other virtual machines without
problems...
I'm going to test, if it's related to the mirror I'm using.
All machines were this is happening are using the same mirror server.
I't very unlikel
2014-02-16 8:54 GMT+01:00 Robert Arkiletian :
> Me: "Hey students, we are using a premier LTS Linux distro, look at
> all you can do!"
> Student: "Can we run Chrome?"
> Me: " Well.no, not on our version."
Hi Robert,
better you make it clear:
Me: "Hey students, we are using a premier LTS Linux
Am 15.02.2014 um 20:40 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
> What this means for all Chromium users is that after upgrade, you will
> no longer have built in flash. I apologize for the inconvenience, but
> we have no real choice in the matter.
i haven't follow this chromium technology discussion right now, t
23 matches
Mail list logo
