Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Mar 1, 2014 9:39 PM, "Lists" wrote: > > On 03/01/2014 06:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > > The biggest thing for us is subversion's ability to use svn 'external' > > properties at any point in a tree to reference any other svn URL. > > Checkouts and updates automatically pull in those other locati

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Lists
On 03/01/2014 06:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > The biggest thing for us is subversion's ability to use svn 'external' > properties at any point in a tree to reference any other svn URL. > Checkouts and updates automatically pull in those other locations into > your working copy. That lets each comp

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Lists wrote: >> > That you want to have a "Central" or "Master" repo is no reason set > things up so you have no ability to change your mind, IMHO. I cannot > think of any significant features that SVN offers that Mercurial does > not. We started with SVN before swi

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux testing effort

2014-03-01 Thread Lists
I had promised to weigh in on my experiences using ZFS in a production environment. We've been testing it for a few months now, and confidence is building. We've started using it in production about a month ago after months of non production testing. I'll append my thoughts in a cross-post from

Re: [CentOS] suggestions for large filesystem server setup (n * 100 TB)

2014-03-01 Thread Lists
On 02/28/2014 06:30 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: >> I'd highly recommend getting a NetApp storage device for something that big. >> >> It's more expensive up front, but the amount of heartache/time saved in the >> long run is WELL worth it. >>

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Lists
On 03/01/2014 11:20 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Lists wrote: >> All good suggestions. I'd prefer mercurial to either of Subversion >> (central repo? Blagh!) > A central repo is exactly what you want when you want one > authoritative copy and you have a network to reac

[CentOS] backing up pending at commands

2014-03-01 Thread Frank Cox
I can easily get a copy of my pending cron jobs so I can keep a backup. "crontab -l > mycron.txt" is part of my backup script, and that does the job nicely. Is there a way that I can get a copy of pending at jobs for this purpose? I can get a list of pending jobs with atq, and I can show each

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread KD Pawson
On 2 Mar 2014, at 7:25, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Lists wrote: >>> >>> All good suggestions. I'd prefer mercurial to either of Subversion >>> (central repo? Blagh!) >> >> A central repo is exactly what you

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Lists wrote: >> >> All good suggestions. I'd prefer mercurial to either of Subversion >> (central repo? Blagh!) > > A central repo is exactly what you want when you want one > authoritative copy and you have a n

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Lists wrote: > > All good suggestions. I'd prefer mercurial to either of Subversion > (central repo? Blagh!) A central repo is exactly what you want when you want one authoritative copy and you have a network to reach it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Lists
On 03/01/2014 08:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Paolo De Michele > wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> I have many server in production but I would verify this: >> >> ex.: I have many domain in /var/www/html/ (domain1 / domain2 / domain3) >> >> now, >> >> How I do check if

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Paolo De Michele wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I have many server in production but I would verify this: > > ex.: I have many domain in /var/www/html/ (domain1 / domain2 / domain3) > > now, > > How I do check if the files are added or changed? > I should apply this "

Re: [CentOS] cachefs

2014-03-01 Thread Steven Tardy
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/Storage_Administration_Guide/#rhel6storage-whatsnew fs-cache is a tech preview(Zero support from redhat). Tried cachefs on a few servers(don't remember if it was rhel 6.1 or 6.2 at the time), had problems (

[CentOS] cachefs

2014-03-01 Thread Rita
has anyone been using cachefs with 6.x series? i have tried using it but i keep getting hung processes after 2 weeks. ATM, running 6.3 but was curious if its more stable on Centos 6.5? -- --- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- ___

Re: [CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Rob Kampen
On 03/01/2014 10:23 PM, Paolo De Michele wrote: Hi everybody, I have many server in production but I would verify this: ex.: I have many domain in /var/www/html/ (domain1 / domain2 / domain3) now, How I do check if the files are added or changed? I should apply this "politic" for all domains

[CentOS] - automation script

2014-03-01 Thread Paolo De Michele
Hi everybody, I have many server in production but I would verify this: ex.: I have many domain in /var/www/html/ (domain1 / domain2 / domain3) now, How I do check if the files are added or changed? I should apply this "politic" for all domains but I don't know how It is possible send me an e