Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks

2014-03-09 Thread SilverTip257
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: > > > > > > I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way > > > CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought > > > I could call it CentAP, for

Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks

2014-03-09 Thread Digimer
On 09/03/14 08:26 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: >>> >>> I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way >>> CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought >>> I could call it CentAP, for Community Enterprise

Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks

2014-03-09 Thread Always Learning
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: > > > > I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way > > CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought > > I could call it CentAP, for Community Enterprise Application Platform. > > Will this infringe o

Re: [CentOS] cachefs

2014-03-09 Thread Rita
Yes, compiler cache is different. I suppose I should ask is there something similar to cache? On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 02.03.2014 15:58, Rita wrote: > > thanks steve. seems like we are in the same boat. > > > > I was wondering if there was an alternative to cachefs lik

Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks

2014-03-09 Thread SilverTip257
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: > I've tried emailing this to centos...@redhat.com , but > mailer-dae...@googlemail.com sent me this > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > centos...@redhat.com > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried t

[CentOS] Question about trademarks

2014-03-09 Thread Pouar
I've tried emailing this to centos...@redhat.com , but mailer-dae...@googlemail.com sent me this Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: centos...@redhat.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for

Re: [CentOS] Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

2014-03-09 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014, P J wrote: James & Paul, Thank you for your suggestions, I will give them a try. Paul, it is indeed a SuperMicro with onboard Intel 82574L's. So I will try the kmod-e1000e package as well. Don't neglect the pcie_aspm=off in grub.conf; that and the elrepo package made the

Re: [CentOS] Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

2014-03-09 Thread P J
James & Paul, Thank you for your suggestions, I will give them a try. Paul, it is indeed a SuperMicro with onboard Intel 82574L's. So I will try the kmod-e1000e package as well. Very grateful for your help to and to this list. Thanks, PJF On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

2014-03-09 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, James A. Peltier wrote: | Every few months I lose network connectivity and have to restart the | server: What kind of machine are you running this on? If you have a BIOS check to see if there is an update available for it. Assuming that you have the latest BIOS on the ma