[CentOS] chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6

*New version of chromium (33.0.1750.152)*Build by me :-)i686 chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.i686.rpm SRPM chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.src.rpm -- View this message in c

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Paul, One big question, before I try to file a bug against EPEL: what version of trac is your package at? I'll reiterate that I don't now use nor have I ever used the Agilo plugin. We've got five servers running Trac: * two run trac-0.12-2.ce

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

Paul, One big question, before I try to file a bug against EPEL: what version of trac is your package at? Yeah, I realize that you probably set it up under an older version that didn't have this bug, but My latest trick (and I've been googling for days now) was to run trac-admin /pa

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: A possibly related question: as I said, I installed via yum trac-agilo-plugin. In /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ I see both agilo and agilo-0.9.7-py2.6.egg-info. In the SetEnv in my apache config *what* do I put in? I see, by running python from t

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

Paul Heinlein wrote: >On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> I'm not sure if the issue is just the agilo plugin or not. Seems as >> though there *ought* to be an admin icon, or at least that the >> existing admin (in small print at the right top) shouldn't be >> ".../trac.cgi/undefined".

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > op 04-04-14 03:01, Always Learning schreef: > > On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 10:09 +1000, David Beveridge wrote: > > > > Children, and indeed people, develop at different ages. I think what is > > needed is something like, for example, > > > >> *

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm not sure if the issue is just the agilo plugin or not. Seems as though there *ought* to be an admin icon, or at least that the existing admin (in small print at the right top) shouldn't be ".../trac.cgi/undefined". Haven't seen that bit of fun.

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

mark wrote> > On 04/03/14 18:21, Paul Heinlein wrote: >> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the >>> information shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why admin is >>> undefined? >>> >>> All of this is from the

Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

On 04/03/14 18:21, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the information >> shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why admin is undefined? >> >> All of this is from the quick-start for agilo,

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 3

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

I have been considering doing a basic intro to computing course along these lines aimed at 8-12yo kids. The school where my kids go have XO machines that run Sugar Desktop for the little kids and gnome for the older kids. We just upgraded all the XO machines to something based on Fedora18. (from 17

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

op 04-04-14 03:01, Always Learning schreef: > On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 10:09 +1000, David Beveridge wrote: > >> There is this >> >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar >> >> based on fedora, for younger children. > Thanks Dave. > > But, looking at the initial web page, this is NOT what I believe is > req