On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Lars Kurth lars.ku...@xen.org wrote:
Hi,
just a quick note that I found the CentOS board meeting minutes which
state that the Virt SIG is moving forward. Consequently I updated
* http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization
*
:: Saludos, ya estoy cansado de preguntarle al Sr. Google por el
tema y no encuentro respuesta, ni siquiera mi emisor de certificados
SSL, validos para correo y web, no me supo dar indicaciones.
Bueno, el caso es que quiero configurar en el servidor un Centos-5.9
actualizado
Hola me parece que cuando tu compras un certificado para que este sea
válido y no te salga la leyenda que mencionas debe servir para asegurar
web, correo y n subdominios, te comento esto porque yo tengo igual un
certificado el mismo que pense que me servía para segurar todos los
servicios que
hola! los certificados comprados tienen que tenerlos para dominio pero
también para los subdominios, si tu tienes como dirección
ftp.dominio.com ese certificado .pem tiene que ser para ftp.dominio.com.
Tanto los certificados auto-firmados como los comprados se configuran de
la misma manera ya
Perdón me he dejado lo de la creación del certificado pem :P
hay una web que te los crea; entra en
http://www.digicert.com/es/apoyo-tecnico/crear-archivo-pem.htm, pero
creo que es más idoneo que el que te ha generado los otros certificados
también te genere el certificado pem ya que si lo
:: Pues despues de leer la pagina que me indicas y hacer lo que van
explicando, y que de hecho ya habia yo intentado, se me encendio una
lucecita, y pense ...
¿ Y si la culpa no es del pure-ftp sino del FileZilla ?
Instale el primer programa de FTP que me mostro el Sr.
yo siempre uso el gftp que me va muy bien y sin problemas jejeje! :)
Lo que ahora tendrias que mirar que servidor FTP es el que se adapta
mejor a filezilla ya que ese cliente de ftp lo utiliza mucha gente :)
Saludos
El 10/04/14 15:43, Salvador Guzman - Salman PSL escribió:
:: Pues
:: Acabo de hacer una prueba con GoFTP y tampoco genera errores.
Me resulta extrañisimo que FileZilla genere un error de algo que es
correcto.
Probare a instalar otro servidor distinto a pure-ftp pero me
fastidiaria, pues es muy sencillo de instalar y de mantener con
For Systems Administrators who missed this broadcast live, it is also
available via a recorded webcast.
I most highly recommend that if you are in charge of any server that is
vulnerable to heartbleed (in CentOS terms, that is anyone with SSL/TLS
services and CentOS-6.5 installed) that you
Dne 9.4.2014 17:27, Johnny Hughes napsal(a):
It is only things that actually used SSL in memory (like httpd, imaps,
pop3s, etc) . those certificates COULD have been impacted. openssh was
not impacted (based on my reading).
What about the user credentials sent over this insecure communication
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 04/10/2014 05:17 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
Dne 9.4.2014 17:27, Johnny Hughes napsal(a):
It is only things that actually used SSL in memory (like httpd, imaps,
pop3s, etc) . those certificates COULD have been impacted. openssh was
not impacted (based on my reading).
What about the user
Dne 10.4.2014 14:47, Johnny Hughes napsal(a):
Those are the two possible things that could have happened.
=
In the case of CentOS servers, the time period where that could have
occurred is from December 1, 2013 (when openssl-1.0.1e-15.el6 was
released in
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:10:31PM +0200, David Hrbá?? wrote:
are going to regenerate the user passwords and ssh keys. What more we
SSH keys were not compromised by heartbleed (unless you had a management
tool that was vulnerable or an alternative ssh daemon that used libssl).
Nothing in the
On 09.Apr.2014, at 22:12, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 04/10/2014 03:09 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
I am assuming that client certificates are handed out to staff. Basically
you can't
really control where people install client certificates and which client
software is used.
If one
Logrotate, by default, runs daily (not hourly) and renames the log files
that it rotates by appending to them the current date. In your case, you
are running it hourly, so it only runs successfully only once a day. The
second time that it will attempt to run in the same day, it will find that
New build:
chromium-33.0.1750.152-4.el6.src.rpmhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9RlkKQB1POSWWhvaHhfWlZKd1E
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSWWhvaHhfWlZKd1E
chromium-33.0.1750.152-4.el6.i386.rpmhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9RlkKQB1POSZTF3MWJYOVE1a1E
http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/logrotate/tags/r3-8-5/logrotate.8
shows hourly as a .conf option was added to 3.8.5...
current centos 6 version is logrotate-3.7.8-17.el6.x86_64
centos6$ man logrotate:
dateformat format_string
Specify the extension for dateext using the
Hi there.
I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to
repurpose with CentOS.
The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade
Manual
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf
Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are
hard to find
H wrote:
Thank you. I have now rebuilt the database and also secured the server
against the heartbleed bug. I do wonder, however, why the rpm database
crashed? It completed the last yum update just fine.
Top posting yet again. This is a disease that apparently has no cure!!!
Tsk, tsk,
ak.
Yep, Marios and Steven are right ... I have changed dateformat for one
log file and I have done another test changing time rotations ... And
all works ok.
Many thanks for your help.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Steven Tardy sjt5a...@gmail.com wrote:
21 matches
Mail list logo
