Thank you John, that is what I think all the time. But as it is a
play-project where he tries to get that trash running at all (...)
btw, I looked it up for you guys, my toaster has 1,2KW, my water-cooker was
the one with 2,2KW ;-)
In the HP-blade-configurator, one blade-server that you described
> > I'm currently using Flash Player 11,2,202,346. The most recent version
> > is 11.2.202.350. The package is from rpmforge. When will be there an
> > update?
Updates from rpmforge have been spotty for a while, so I've been building
my own.
___
Cen
On 04/12/14 10:57, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/12/2014 10:46 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> Now, if I may rant just a bit.
>>
>> ...
>> Sorry for the rant.
>>
>
> And even more sorry that I didn't make it clear that the rant was
> directed at no-one in particular, but just out there on the list, and
> defi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:12:54AM +1000, David Beveridge wrote:
> see https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0160
> This issue did not affect the versions of openssl as shipped with Red
> Hat Enterprise Linux 5, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 and earlier, Red
> Hat JBoss Enterprise Applicat
Stephen Harris writes:
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 02:06:42PM +, David G. Miller wrote:
>
> > Be aware that the actual "owner" of the dynamic IP address is still
> > authoritative for reverse look ups. This means that some uses of a system
> > with a dynamic IP address are problematic (e.g
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:42:07PM +, David G. Miller wrote:
> Interesting. I had to have my ISP add a C record to their DNS for my fixed
> IP address before most of my e-mails were accepted. I recently also had to
> add an SPF (sender policy framework) record on my DNS to get my e-mails
> ac
On 04/14/2014 08:02 AM, mark wrote:
> We've got servers that are 5+ years old, including a
> once-supercomputer from SGI that's from, I think, '03. And if *anyone*
> thinks we need to get rid of it, they can contact me offlist, to
> arrange, from their pocket, a donation to the civilian sector o
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:41:14PM -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
> >
> > In the context of the OP, when mutt tries to deal with a message (e.g.,
> > deleting, moving to a folder), it can be boatloads faster, since
> > handling the message w
Good Afternoon,
As per the installation guide, section 30.2.2 I’ve created an efidefault file
at /var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux/pxelinux.cfg/efidefault
However, this file is never requested by the 64 bit PXE loader (bootx64.efi),
as shown by tcpdump:
75 RRQ "/pxelinux/42272635-0011-5053-ACF2-82A
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 08:02 AM, mark wrote:
>> We've got servers that are 5+ years old, including a
>> once-supercomputer from SGI that's from, I think, '03. And if *anyone*
>> thinks we need to get rid of it, they can contact me offlist, to
>> arrange, from their pocket, a donation to
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:28 AM, wrote:
> >
> Oh. START THE PROCESS to budget for replacements of the PE 1950's. Start
> it last week. We replaced all ours a couple of years ago - inside of a
> month, we had something like 4? 6? of them have the RAID daughterboard
> croak (talk about quality con
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Adam Bishop wrote:
49 RRQ "/pxelinux/efidefault" octet tsize 0 blksize 512
I’ve worked around this by placing a separate efidefault in the root
of the pxelinux directory - however this is undesirable as this
means I have to maintain separate configs for BIOS and UEFI.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014, Russell Miller wrote:
>
>On Apr 13, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
>>
>> In the context of the OP, when mutt tries to deal with a message (e.g.,
>> deleting, moving to a folder), it can be boatloads faster, since
>> handling the message works on a small file which
I recently received an 8GB usb stick that fails to mount on my fully
patched CentOS 6.5 desktop machine.
The stick works just fine on a windoze 7 laptop (my daughter's) with no
special drivers installed.
fdisk -l /dev/sdf gives the following:
Disk /dev/sdf: 8004 MB, 8004829184 bytes
102 heads
On 4/14/2014 6:06 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> I recently received an 8GB usb stick that fails to mount on my fully
> patched CentOS 6.5 desktop machine.
>
> The stick works just fine on a windoze 7 laptop (my daughter's) with
> no special drivers installed.
most USB sticks are formatted FAT32
--
On Apr 14, 2014, at 7:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/14/2014 6:06 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>> I recently received an 8GB usb stick that fails to mount on my fully
>> patched CentOS 6.5 desktop machine.
>>
>> The stick works just fine on a windoze 7 laptop (my daughter's) with
>> no special d
>
> We have been using Maildir with courier-imap for decades, and
> haven't had an issue with this. My security folder typically has
> 25,000+ messages for the last 7 days messages, and accessing
> either with IMAP or directly with mutt isn't a problem.
>
> I have written various scripts over th
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Russell Miller wrote:
>>
> Even if there aren't huge issues with doing this, it's an easily fixed thing.
> Allowing directories to have
> hundreds of thousands of entries as a matter of course, even if it's
> something that causes no issues
> in many cases, to me
On 4/14/2014 9:51 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Even if modern systems sort-of handle it, it still seems like a bad
> thing to do when you consider that opening a file for writing has to
> atomically decide whether that name already exists before creating it
> - so other concurrent create/delete operat
19 matches
Mail list logo
