Re: [CentOS] [OT] how do I remove a battery

On 04/26/14 00:06, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, g wrote: > >> something i will suggest, being that you pulled cell from >> a dead board, consider getting another cell. >> >> then, wrap cell and package it is in with 'saran wrap', squeeze >> out as much a possible, then wrap with

Re: [CentOS] chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6

On25 April 2014 @22:54 zulu, ngeorgop wrote: > New version of chromium (34.0.1847.132) chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.i686.rpm > > Source: chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.src.rpm >

Re: [CentOS] chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: > Is there a version of chromium for CentOS with a new enough flash plug-in > to work with VMware vSphere client for ESXi 5.5? > I'd expect pepperflash is missing from builds due to licensing restrictions [0] (as Johnny mentioned in relat

Re: [CentOS] chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6

Is there a version of chromium for CentOS with a new enough flash plug-in to work with VMware vSphere client for ESXi 5.5? Thanks, Mark MARK H RICHER, MS CS NPS-NCR Digital Forensics Lab IT Manager Computer Science Department Naval Postgraduate School - National Capital Region (NCR) 900 N Glebe

[CentOS] chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6

New version of chromium (34.0.1847.132) chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.i686.rpm Source: chromium-34.0.1847.132-1.el6.src.rpm I was *OBLIGED* to patch g

Re: [CentOS] Some basic SELinux questions

Sorry, I got trigger happy with the "delete" key... so this message is a little out of order... Eero Volotinen wrote: > how about using auditd or ossec ? And it looks like auditd may be exactly what I need. Thanks! -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailin

Re: [CentOS] Some basic SELinux questions

how about using auditd or ossec ? -- Eero 2014-04-25 23:32 GMT+03:00 Bowie Bailey : > On 4/25/2014 4:27 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Stephen Harris wrote: > >>> a problem when CFe modifies a file that I don't want modified

Re: [CentOS] Some basic SELinux questions

how about using audits ? 2014-04-25 23:32 GMT+03:00 Bowie Bailey : > On 4/25/2014 4:27 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Stephen Harris wrote: > >>> a problem when CFe modifies a file that I don't want modified on my > >>> machin

Re: [CentOS] Some basic SELinux questions

On 4/25/2014 4:27 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Stephen Harris wrote: >>> a problem when CFe modifies a file that I don't want modified on my >>> machine. >> Doesn't cfengine allow for logging changes on a per-system basis? > I don'

Re: [CentOS] Some basic SELinux questions

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:51:40PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Stephen Harris wrote: > > a problem when CFe modifies a file that I don't want modified on my > > machine. > Doesn't cfengine allow for logging changes on a per-system basis? I don't control the cfengine configuration, so I don't

Re: [CentOS] RHEL7 beta discussions?

This one might be more of a GNOME3 question. I'm running the RHEL7 beta on a laptop where I used to run windows xp. It's a Dell Latitude w/docking station and the dock has a coax/digital sound output. On windows, it would automatically switch to the analog headphone jack if I plugged headphone

Re: [CentOS] Some basic SELinux questions

Stephen Harris wrote: > At my place we don't use SELinux because we have a gazillion tonnes of > legacy software that just are not compatible with the default policies. > No one wants to go to the effort of working out everything that needs > changing. > > We also use cfengine for central managemen

[CentOS] Some basic SELinux questions

At my place we don't use SELinux because we have a gazillion tonnes of legacy software that just are not compatible with the default policies. No one wants to go to the effort of working out everything that needs changing. We also use cfengine for central management. Which somestimes causes a pro

Re: [CentOS] [OT] how do I remove a battery

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, g wrote: > something i will suggest, being that you pulled cell from > a dead board, consider getting another cell. > > then, wrap cell and package it is in with 'saran wrap', squeeze > out as much a possible, then wrap with aluminum foil. place in > freezer and it will be wai

Re: [CentOS] Need Python3 for C6

- Original Message - | I need Python 3.4 (latest) on CentOS 6 for development purposes | (teaching programming). | | Need advice for best method to do this. I am concerned about not | breaking the internal plumbing of C6. I was thinking about installing | it into /opt. | | I noticed http

Re: [CentOS] Need Python3 for C6

On 2014-04-25 19:27, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > I need Python 3.4 (latest) on CentOS 6 for development purposes > (teaching programming). > > Need advice for best method to do this. I am concerned about not > breaking the internal plumbing of C6. I was thinking about installing > it into /opt. > >

[CentOS] Need Python3 for C6

I need Python 3.4 (latest) on CentOS 6 for development purposes (teaching programming). Need advice for best method to do this. I am concerned about not breaking the internal plumbing of C6. I was thinking about installing it into /opt. I noticed http://puias.math.ias.edu/data/puias/computationa

[CentOS] Solved? - Re: Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?

On 04/25/2014 12:13 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? > > On CentOS 6.5, OpenSSL does but SSH does not. > >> How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the >> OpenS

Re: [CentOS] Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? On CentOS 6.5, OpenSSL does but SSH does not. How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the OpenSSL list) On a CentOS 6.5 box, asking for an ECDSA key fa

Re: [CentOS] SELInux and POSTFIX

On Wed, April 23, 2014 16:44, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Looks like this is allowed in rhel6.5 policy. You could try > > selinux-policy-3.7.19-235.el6 > on people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6 > yum --enablerepo=localfile update selinux\* Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities Loa

Re: [CentOS] Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?

On 04/25/2014 08:53 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 04/25/2014 08:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 25.04.2014 13:57, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >>> Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? >>> >>> How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the >>>

Re: [CentOS] Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?

On 04/25/2014 08:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 25.04.2014 13:57, schrieb Robert Moskowitz: >> Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? >> >> How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the >> OpenSSL list) >> >> The reason I suspect a problem i

Re: [CentOS] Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?

From: Robert Moskowitz > Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? Google finds: "ECDSA Support in OpenSSL Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) is a variant of the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) which uses Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC). Note that o

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 12

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

[CentOS] Support for ECDSA in OpenSSL?

Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the OpenSSL list) The reason I suspect a problem is that HIPL for Centos (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/) is not creating the ECDSA Host Identity, whereas my Fedora i

Re: [CentOS] Ulimit problem - CentOS 5.10

Am 24.04.2014 um 19:44 schrieb James Pearson : > Nathan Duehr wrote: >> >> Attempting to force the ulimit up inside the RC script has no effect, since >> the package is running >> as a non-root user. It fails to raise the limit. > > init.d scripts run as root so you should be able to set a hard