I took the drive out and partitioned it on windows 7 64bit.
Now parted crashes:
# parted /dev/sdb
GNU Parted 2.1
Using /dev/sdb
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) print
Error: Invalid argument during seek for read on /dev/sdb
Retry/Ignore/Cancel? i
Error: The
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:15:25 +
Styma, Robert E (Robert) wrote:
> My skill with RPM's is somewhat limited, but does anyone know
> of a set of instructions and a spec file that could be used to
> get started on this process?
I've never tried it with hplip, but many rpms can be updated by simp
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Keith Keller
wrote:
> >
> At any rate, for CentOS 6 we can still say "if you don't like NM, don't
> use it".
Yes, but we are approaching the end of an era. As soon as 7 is out,
you won't be able to get applications for 6 and you'll be forced to
switch, Oh wait,
My fully patched CentOS 6.5 system uses:
hplip-common-3.12.4-4.el6_4.1.i686
hpijs-3.12.4-4.el6_4.1.i686
hplip-libs-3.12.4-4.el6_4.1.i686
My wife's printer becomes supported at 3.13.somethingOrOther
and the current release is 3.14.something.
Why are we so far behind?
I realize that I can download
On 2014-04-30, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Keith Keller
> wrote:
>>
>> No settings might be better. If I take my laptop from one site to
>> another, keeping my previous resolv.conf intact, and NM doesn't remove
>> it, then my laptop will try to query the previous site'
hdparm reports 4096 (reading
http://karelzak.blogspot.com/2010/05/4096-byte-sector-hard-drives.html)
Now I am really going nuts.
root@five-72 ~
# cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/physical_block_size
512
root@five-72 ~
# cat /sys/block/sdb/queue/logical_block_size
512
root@five-72 ~
# cat /sys/block
root@five-72 ~
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 8.67101 s, 121 MB/s
root@five-72 ~
# parted /dev/sdb
GNU Parted 2.1
Using /dev/sdb
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) mklabel gp
Anyone know of a safe repo I can find DSDP-devel?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>>
> So, have you ever had to deal with a CentOS box and multiple NICs.
> Especially one where you've cloned it or moved a disk to a new
> chassis? Apparently there is just not a good way to identify
> interfaces.
>
> Yep, do it all the time -
On 04/30/2014 02:10 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Just like what Lose, I mean, WinDoze, logs... paragraph long "error
> messages" that are mostly useless and information-free.
As long as there is unique information to google, it will work out. And
while I detest them, the Windows hexadecimal co
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
>> I'll take [SRV record examples] as a 'no' for the general case.
> How is an RFC quote and an example of a running standardized application
> using the feature a 'no?' Please read
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRV_record and see just how
On 04/30/2014 02:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> You do know that windows servers have a fairly complete set of command
>> line options, don't you?
>>
>> Well the one and only time I configured an interface on windows from the
>> command line I c
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 01:46 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>> Dynamic DNS can be, yes. It depends upon the way the zone file is
>>> updated and whether it's Internet-exposed on not.
>> So how can it be dynamic, but controlled at the sam
On 4/30/2014 11:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Makes me wonder why we have cars that are
>> >all approximately the correct widths to fit on a road and brake and
>> >accelerator pedals in the same relative positions.
> a) Human fits to where pedals are.
> b) I still go with the Roman milspec on m
On 04/30/2014 01:46 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> Dynamic DNS can be, yes. It depends upon the way the zone file is
>> updated and whether it's Internet-exposed on not.
> So how can it be dynamic, but controlled at the same time?
>
Set up a DD-WR
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>
> You do know that windows servers have a fairly complete set of command
> line options, don't you?
>
> Well the one and only time I configured an interface on windows from the
> command line I couldn't believe I had to type
> some great big st
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:04 PM, wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 04/30/2014 12:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I blame all our economic problems on the wastefulness of
>>> duplicated effort in learning to
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:04 PM, wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2014 12:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Yes, I blame all our economic problems on the wastefulness of
>> duplicated effort in learning to manage computers. That an
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 10:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> The upstream documentation has some info; the man pages (nm-applet(1),
> nm-connection-editor(1), nm-online(1), nm-tool(1), nmcli(1),
> NetworkManager.conf(5), nm-system-settings.conf(5), and
> NetworkManager(8) all have useful in
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Steve Clark
> wrote:
>>
>> What I meant about Windows is everything seems to be hidden behind some
>> gui interface, which
>> leads people to not really understand the underpinnings of what is truly
>> happening. NM seems akin
>> to this, at
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On 04/30/2014 12:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Yes, I blame all our economic problems on the wastefulness of
> duplicated effort in learning to manage computers. That and everyone
> having to stock a near-infinite numbe
On 04/30/2014 01:01 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> What I meant about Windows is everything seems to be hidden behind some gui
>> interface, which
>> leads people to not really understand the underpinnings of what is truly
>> happening. NM seems
On 04/30/2014 01:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I do have a reason for that hope... remember the thread a month or so
> ago, where *we* *were* asked about tcp-wrappers?
Yes; I don't recall if I commented or not.
> For things that mean major changes - systemd, NM, etc, I'm hoping
> that, in t
On 04/30/2014 10:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I agree that WiFi networking is difficult, but ethernet networking, in
> my experience, is 99.9% stable.
Sure is; but we do bonding for a reason.
> I wish NM would just stick to WiFi.
There are other interfaces, like various VPN's and WWAN cards,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> You forgot to mention interoperable along with effective and complete.
>
> No, I didn't forget it.
>
>>> Dynamic DNS and/or mDNS with associated addresses deals with the need
>>> for a static IP;
>> Is that secure?
>
> Dynamic DNS can be, ye
Lamar Owen wrote:
> But the simple fact is that NetworkManager is with us for a long time
> coming. You don't have to use it if you don't need it's particular
Which leads to a thought: you said that the time to "vote" on NM was long
past. My response was that none of *us* saw, or were solicited,
On 04/30/2014 12:54 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> What I meant about Windows is everything seems to be hidden behind
> some gui interface, which
> leads people to not really understand the underpinnings of what is
> truly happening.
A GUI and a registry; and I agree with that assessment.
> NM seems
On 04/30/2014 11:10 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> My last test with Network Manager was a couple of years ago. At that time,
> a client that was set to boot using DHCP and NM would not set its hostname
> when such was provided with the DHCP response. That was a show stopper for
> me (none of my 200+
On 04/30/2014 12:56 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Choice is great, surprises not so much. And I find it surprising that
> NM sometimes runs, sometimes doesn't, depending on seemingly unrelated
> things.
Those would be bugs, and bugs need fixing. But they can't be fixed if
they're not reported.
>
On 04/30/2014 11:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> You forgot to mention interoperable along with effective and complete.
No, I didn't forget it.
>> Dynamic DNS and/or mDNS with associated addresses deals with the need
>> for a static IP;
> Is that secure?
Dynamic DNS can be, yes. It depends upon t
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>
> What I meant about Windows is everything seems to be hidden behind some gui
> interface, which
> leads people to not really understand the underpinnings of what is truly
> happening. NM seems akin
> to this, at least the last time I tried
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 10:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I've got two rooms, with a number of servers in each room behind a
>> firewall, *required* by US law (HIPAA & PII data). I've got compute
>> clusters, and all the compute nodes are all 192.168.
On 04/30/2014 11:22 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 10:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Define "stable". please.
> I define stable in this context as 'behaving in a completely consistent
> and predictable fashion.'
>
>> I have servers (and I really, REALLY want to
>> reboot them, but they're
On 04/30/2014 10:47 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I've got two rooms, with a number of servers in each room behind a
> firewall, *required* by US law (HIPAA & PII data). I've got compute
> clusters, and all the compute nodes are all 192.168.etc, and they MUST
> NOT CHANGE, EVER!!! All of those s
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 12:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I think it is unfortunate there there is no standard defined for
>> configuration files or tools to stabilize it and make common
>> operations across platforms possible in spite of the bizarre
>> d
On 04/30/2014 11:01 AM, Keith Keller wrote:
> I don't use NetworkManager, so I don't know the answer to this
> question: is there a way to tell it not to clobber portions of your
> network configuration, and/or to provide it with defaults if it can't
> determine values for a particular option?
On Wed Apr 30 12:12:41 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> That's not what I think, nor is it what I said.
Quote 1:
> Back in the late 1800's people who had used tillers to steer their
> horseless carriages probably though the same thing about this new fancy
> gizmo called a steering wheel. And automatic
On 04/30/2014 12:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I think it is unfortunate there there is no standard defined for
> configuration files or tools to stabilize it and make common
> operations across platforms possible in spite of the bizarre
> differences each vendor tries to add. Something like posi
On 04/30/2014 11:39 AM, Zube wrote:
> I find this common argument execrable. It seems to suggest that if
> I don't accept and embrace the new things that you do, I'm somehow a
> Luddite or my thinking is backwards.
That's not what I think, nor is it what I said. Being unwilling to even
try some
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Zube wrote:
>
> I run CentOS because I want stability. It works and I know how to
> work it. When something like this is changed, there is an opportunity
> cost for having to figure out how to get it back to the way I want it
> to be (compare to recent issues wi
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 11:18 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> But freenx/NX/x2go put the big picture back the way it belongs.
>
> For certain usess I agree with that; for others, not so much. Seamlessly
> pulling applications from an application server to the
On 04/30/2014 11:18 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> But freenx/NX/x2go put the big picture back the way it belongs.
For certain usess I agree with that; for others, not so much. Seamlessly
pulling applications from an application server to the display server
has its distinct advantages, particularly
On Wed Apr 30 11:22:56 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> I really try hard to not be snide or offend very often, but the idea
> that something needs to stay a certain way either just because it's
> always been that way or because we can't do it the way someone else who
> we don't like has done it deserve
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Keith Keller
wrote:
>
> No settings might be better. If I take my laptop from one site to
> another, keeping my previous resolv.conf intact, and NM doesn't remove
> it, then my laptop will try to query the previous site's DNS. They may
> not like that; depending
On 04/30/2014 10:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Define "stable". please.
I define stable in this context as 'behaving in a completely consistent
and predictable fashion.'
> I have servers (and I really, REALLY want to
> reboot them, but they're home directory or project servers, and so it's
>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>> That hasn't been a reasonable assumption for anything running X, ever, and
>> even less so with freenx/x2go.
>
> Interestingly, X turns the whole client/server thing on its head.
> and always has.
But freenx/NX/x2go put the big picture
My last test with Network Manager was a couple of years ago. At that time,
a client that was set to boot using DHCP and NM would not set its hostname
when such was provided with the DHCP response. That was a show stopper for
me (none of my 200+ non-wifi clients have any configuration on them th
On 2014-04-30, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> I don't mind NM editing resolv.conf if it knows
> - or even thinks it knows - how to improve
> on the current settings, but what I don't understand
> is why it occasionally deletes the current settings
> without substituting anything else.
> I can't imagine
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 03:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> There are two sides to this. On the one hand you want to be able to
>> nail down server configurations - and probably anything that is going
>> to stay wired.
>
> Ok, I'll bite on this one.
>
> *Why
Lamar Owen wrote:
> My experience? There is no such thing as a 100% stable networking
> environment.
I agree that WiFi networking is difficult,
but ethernet networking, in my experience, is 99.9% stable.
I wish NM would just stick to WiFi.
> NetworkManager is well-documented.
Where?
I haven't
On 04/30/2014 10:36 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> ...If you install the Desktop
>> package, there's a bit of an assumption that you want a Desktop, no?
>>
> No. Just no. Not if you think that means there is just one Desktop
> and it is physically
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 03:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> There are two sides to this. On the one hand you want to be able to
>> nail down server configurations - and probably anything that is going
>> to stay wired.
>
> Ok, I'll bite on this one.
>
> *Why* do we want a server configuratio
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> >
> NetworkManager is well-documented. You just have to read the docs and
> be willing to try something new. It also logs to /var/log/messages in
> plain text, too. There are more pieces, yes, to trace through. But,
> unless you install the
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 02:42 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> This may be fine for users that don't know what they are doing or
>> don't have a stable networking environment, but I have found for me it
>> causes nothing but heartache.
> My experience? There is no such thing as a 100% stable n
On 04/29/2014 03:17 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I think upstream might consider, esp. that we're now a "partner",
> talking to *us*. I mean, this is an ENTERPRISE o/s, and that means,
> heavily, *servers*, and does anyone actually use wireless, or anything
> other than hardwired, for a server?
On 04/29/2014 03:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> There are two sides to this. On the one hand you want to be able to
> nail down server configurations - and probably anything that is going
> to stay wired.
Ok, I'll bite on this one.
*Why* do we want a server configuration to be nailed down? Is i
I will not have access to email on Wed 30th April 2014.
If you need urgent support please email or call
Dan Benton on d...@dogsbodytechnology.com or 07718 679512
Thank you
Alex Last
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
On 04/29/2014 02:42 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> This may be fine for users that don't know what they are doing or
> don't have a stable networking environment, but I have found for me it
> causes nothing but heartache.
Steve, first, if this comes off as a rant, that's not my intention, and
it's n
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Wed, April 30, 2014 07:52, Robert Heller wrote:
>> Before I go through the hassle of building it myself I want to know if
>> someone else has built RPMS for Mailman 2.1.16. I *need* to update the
version
>> of Mailman on my CentOS 5 server to Mailman 2.1.16 in order to
op 30-04-14 15:09, schreef Alexandru Chiscan:
In KDE you can force the position, size, fullscreen etc based on the
window
properties: class title, etc.
you can access the options by clicking right mouse button on the window title
and
selecting "Advanced->Special Window Settings..."
you
In KDE you can force the position, size, fullscreen etc based on the
window
properties: class title, etc.
you can access the options by clicking right mouse button on the window title
and
selecting "Advanced->Special Window Settings..."
you can memorize the positioning for your windows on
On Wed, April 30, 2014 07:52, Robert Heller wrote:
> Before I go through the hassle of building it myself I want to know if someone
> else has built RPMS for Mailman 2.1.16. I *need* to update the version of
> Mailman on my CentOS 5 server to Mailman 2.1.16 in order to be able to use the
> from_i
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Before I go through the hassle of building it myself I want to know if someone
else has built RPMS for Mailman 2.1.16. I *need* to update the version of
Mailman on my CentOS 5 server to Mailman 2.1.16 in order to be able to use the
from_is_list option to deal with DMARC issues with Yahoo, Aol,
On 30.04.2014 11:00, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> I'd like to start from konsole a virt-viewer to vm1 on screen vga1
> and another virt-viewer to vm2 on screen lvds1.
>
> Anyone knows if this is possible with KDE on a CentOS 6.5?
>
> Thanks
> Patrick
Hello,
I have used Devilspie for this in Gnome2
Anyone seeing this?
/etc/cron.daily/rkhunter:
/usr/bin/rkhunter: regel 13967: [: eenzijdige operator werd verwacht, -ne
gevonden
Translating: line 13967 unary operator expected -ne found
Line 13967 is: if [ `${IPCS_CMD} -u 2>/dev/null | awk -F' ' '/segments
allocated/ {print $3}'` -ne 0 ]; t
I'd like to start from konsole a virt-viewer to vm1 on screen vga1 and another
virt-viewer to vm2 on screen lvds1.
Anyone knows if this is possible with KDE on a CentOS 6.5?
Thanks
Patrick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos
Les Mikesell wrote:
> For example, I think there are ways to tell NM not to
> mess with a specific interface setting, and maybe a way to say you
> don't want it to screw up your resolv.conf file,
I don't mind NM editing resolv.conf if it knows
- or even thinks it knows - how to improve
on the cur
68 matches
Mail list logo
