On gio, 2014-06-12 at 07:17 +0200, lee wrote:
Lars Kurth lars.ku...@xen.org writes:
Let me wear the hat of the user. The major hurdles were network setup,
installing something in a vm, and the chaotic state the documentation is
in.
Wow... chaotic state :-O
Don't get me wrong. I know
On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, lee wrote:
I knew before I started that network setup would be a PITA because years
ago, I set up a VM for someone who didn't have a 64bit system to compile
a 64bit version of some software. The network setup being so
ridiculously difficult has kept me from touching
On 06/11/2014 04:21 AM, Lars Kurth wrote:
Hi all,
following the discussion on about documentation, I was wondering whether
we need to look at a standard way in which we recommend how to provision
images for VMs. Am starting this with a Xen hat, but the discussion
should not be specific
On mar, 2014-06-10 at 17:21 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
Hi all,
Hi!
== #1 virt-install ==
Advantages: similar to KVM
Disadvantages: may cause weird issues / confusion with people switching
back to xl. The core issue is that with the current version of xen and
libvirt, this only works
On gio, 2014-06-12 at 22:34 +1200, Peter wrote:
This is not a complete list of the ways you can install a VM either. My
personal preference is to manually create the filesystem for the VM and
then install the OS core with yum. Then after tweaking some config
files you can start up the VM and
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 17:21 +0100, Lars Kurth wrote:
Hi all,
following the discussion on about documentation, I was wondering whether
we need to look at a standard way in which we recommend how to provision
images for VMs. Am starting this with a Xen hat, but the discussion
should not be
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Dario Faggioli raist...@linux.it wrote:
On gio, 2014-06-12 at 22:34 +1200, Peter wrote:
This is not a complete list of the ways you can install a VM either. My
personal preference is to manually create the filesystem for the VM and
then install the OS
Hm, xen kinda makes the cpus and their power management invisible, too:
root@heimdall:~# xenpm get-cpufreq-para
[CPU0] failed to get cpufreq parameter
[...]
root@heimdall:~# xenpm get-cpufreq-states
root@heimdall:~#
So I guess it could as well make it so that lspci doesn't show
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2014 03:47 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
If you're up for it, Xen wiki will be glad to host it! :-P
I would love to do a writeup on this, but my time is extremely limited
right now. I'll see what I can do.
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2014 08:30 AM, Peter wrote:
On 06/13/2014 03:47 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
If you're up for it, Xen wiki will be glad to host it! :-P
I would love to do a writeup on this, but my time is extremely
limited right now. I'll see what I can
Hello,
I am running two dom0s, one on CentOS 5 with Xen 4.1.2 (from Gitco) and the
other one on CentOS 6 with Xen 4.2.4 (from Xen4CentOS). I host one LVM
based domU on both from the same template (CentOS 6 PV) with the same Xen
config (see below). However, the domU on Xen 4.1 reports itself as
The world needs documentation bounties.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2014 03:47 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
If you're up for it, Xen wiki will be glad to host it! :-P
I would love to do a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/11/2014 10:44 AM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote:
buenos Dias
Me pueden horientar sobre el siguiente caso tengo un servidor
centos 6.4 con MailScanner el problema que tengo es que para que
mis usuarios internos puedan mandar email
Am 11.06.14 17:57, schrieb Arun Khan:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Am 11.06.14 15:43, schrieb Arun Khan:
CentOS version?
old one 5.10
Squid version?
squid-2.6.STABLE21-6.el5
FWIW, Squid2 supports http 1.0 and
Les Mikesell wrote:
Does XFS have any advantages over ext4 for normal users, eg with laptops?
I've only seen it touted for machines with enormous disks, 200TB plus.
It is generally better at handling a lot of files - faster
creation/deletion when there are a large number in the same
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Wed, June 11, 2014 18:31, Frank Cox wrote:
I decided that the next time I reformatted my main desktop computer (this one)
I would have a ssd installed in it to use for the boot drive. Now that Centos
7 is on the horizon, I'm thinking that the time is approaching when I'll want
to do that.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
However, I can start a chrome connection to gmail and it just goes
direct (which happens to work, I just prefer the proxy which will use
a
Makes me wonder what happens if a site uses spdy://
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
wrote:
However, I
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Billy Crook bcr...@riskanalytics.com wrote:
Makes me wonder what happens if a site uses spdy://
I'd expect that to be the case for chrome talking to gmail. But it is
supposed to run over https://.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:35 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
wrote:
On Wed, June 11, 2014 18:31, Frank Cox wrote:
I decided that the next time I reformatted my main desktop computer
(this one)
I would have a ssd installed in it to use for the boot drive. Now that
Centos
7 is
On 6/12/2014 9:38 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
A former employer of mine contracts out destruction of conventional hard
drives with a machine that has a hydraulic arm and a wedge. Effectively
bending the platters and some of the drive. Hardware destruction (prior to
recycling/disposal) in certain
SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:35 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
wrote:
On Wed, June 11, 2014 18:31, Frank Cox wrote:
snip
I have a question about SSD respecting security. Recently I have been
investigating sanitizing these devices, together with 'smart-phones,
On 6/12/2014 10:12 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We use two methods: for the drives that are totally dead, or*sigh* the
SCSI drives, they get deGaussed. For SATA that's still running, we use
DBAN.*Great* software. From what I've read, one pass would probably be
good enough, given how data's
On 6/11/2014 07:11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Does XFS have any advantages over ext4 for normal users, eg with laptops?
If you graph machine size -- in whatever dimension you like -- vs number
deployed, I think you'd find all laptops over on the left side of the
CentOS deployment curve. I'd
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
Does XFS have any advantages over ext4 for normal users, eg with laptops?
I've only seen it touted for machines with enormous disks, 200TB plus.
It is generally better at handling a lot of files - faster
This little bit here is awesome and made me laugh. Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
[*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million terabytes,
which requires about 500 cubic meters of the densest HDDs available
today. You'd
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
[*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million terabytes,
Isn't there some ratio of RAM to filesystem size (or maybe number of
files or inodes) that you need to make it through an fsck?
--
Les Mikesell
On Thu Jun 12 17:21:43 UTC 2014, John R Pierce pierce at hogranch.com wrote:
On 6/12/2014 10:12 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
We use two methods: for the drives that are totally dead, or*sigh* the
SCSI drives, they get deGaussed. For SATA that's still running, we use
DBAN.*Great*
James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu Jun 12 17:21:43 UTC 2014, John R Pierce pierce at hogranch.com
wrote:
On 6/12/2014 10:12 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
We use two methods: for the drives that are totally dead, or*sigh* the
SCSI drives, they get deGaussed. For SATA that's still running, we use
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
This little bit here is awesome and made me laugh. Thanks!
Agreed. Warren wins the Internet today.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
[*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million
terabytes,
On 6/12/2014 12:54, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
This little bit here is awesome and made me laugh. Thanks!
Agreed. Warren wins the Internet today.
Thank you, thank you.
Now go read some What if? to see how a true master plays this game.
[*]
Oh yeah.. He does great work. I'm looking forward to his book that comes
out.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On 6/12/2014 12:54, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
This little bit here is awesome and made me laugh.
Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
This little bit here is awesome and made me laugh. Thanks!
Agreed. Warren wins the Internet today.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
[*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8
--On Thursday, June 12, 2014 10:35:26 AM -0400 James B. Byrne
byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I have a question about SSD respecting security. [...]
I have come to the rather
unsettling conclusion that it is effectively impossible to 'sanitize'
these things short of complete and utter physical
Hi Dan,
Chroot gets you a space that looks like it is a separate system. Given
this is R, I assume you are probably wanting this for HPC like
purposes... Could I suggest building your own version of R and
installing into a nfs area? You may also wish to investigate the
facilities provided by
--On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 07:52:56 AM -0400 Robert Heller
hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Before I go through the hassle of building it myself I want to know if
someone else has built RPMS for Mailman 2.1.16.
Following up on this, has anyone got a documented procedure, .spec
files, or
37 matches
Mail list logo
