[CentOS] Thunderbird bug, anyone else have seen it?

2014-06-15 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541130 The bug I see is using thunderbird 24.6 which is the latest update on centos 6.5. The issue is that every time I open an email with some "+" somewhere in the source (which I didn't traced yet) I get annoying message: An error occurred while loa

Re: [CentOS] dumb developer explodes yum

2014-06-15 Thread Dejan
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > ... and I kind of feel dumb asking this, but couldn't you just restore > whatever was deleted from a backup? Or since it was a development machine, just rescue what data you really need and re-image the machine from scratch. Might be _way

Re: [CentOS] dumb developer explodes yum

2014-06-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
... and I kind of feel dumb asking this, but couldn't you just restore whatever was deleted from a backup? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] dumb developer explodes yum

2014-06-15 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 06/15/2014 09:46 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hi thanks for your input. I should've realized the versions were different. > But when I try that suggestion you made, this is the result I get: > > [root@host1 i386]# rpm -Uvh elfutils-libs-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm > elfutils-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm You are mi

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-15 Thread John R Pierce
On 6/15/2014 1:23 AM, Warren Young wrote: > I assume we’re climbing out of the doubling doldrums brought on by the Taiwan > floods by now. The floods that knocked out WDC were in Thailand, not Taiwan. and I do believe the spinning media industry is running into physics and much further progress

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-15 Thread EGO-II.1
On 06/15/2014 04:23 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Warren Young wrote: > >> [*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million terabytes, >> which requires about 500 cubic meters of the densest HDDs available today. > I’ve been wondering what 500 TB looks like

Re: [CentOS] apr buildconf fails

2014-06-15 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 15.06.2014 05:43, schrieb Tim Dunphy: First of all, please stop this nasty top-posting. There is no need on a mailinglist to repeat content of the previous mailing which you do not directly reply to. You already select the part you want to respond to, that's good. So just strip off the rest.

Re: [CentOS] dumb developer explodes yum

2014-06-15 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 06/14/14 23:00, Tim Dunphy wrote: >> >> Try just rebuilding the database... >> rpm --rebuilddb > > > > Thanks for the advice! However, no luck there. :( > > btw.. obscuring the host name > > [root@host1 apr-util-1.5.1]# rpm --rebuilddb > > [root@host1 apr-util-1.5.1]# cd /tmp/install/i38

Re: [CentOS] dumb developer explodes yum

2014-06-15 Thread Tim Dunphy
> > Reinstall the package versions which are already registered in your > rpm_db and not the old ones: elfutils*-0.137-3.el5. All at the same time. Reinstall the package versions which are already registered in your > rpm_db and not the old ones: elfutils*-0.137-3.el5. All at the same time. Hi t

Re: [CentOS] Question about clustering

2014-06-15 Thread Digimer
On 15/06/14 08:54 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Another question is about fencing. I've ridden that a cluster must have > fencing to be considered as such. On CentOS 6.5 there is stonith that > concerns node level fencing. For this type of fencing I must have ilo, > ilom, drac, and other. It's poss

[CentOS] Question about clustering

2014-06-15 Thread Alessandro Baggi
Hi list, I'm new to clustering, and I'm running a little cluster@home. The cluster is running on a workstation hardware and running on Centos 6.5. Component: corosync, pacemaker, drbd and pcs. All works good. This cluster has different resources: 1) drbd0 2) drbd1 3) drbd0_fs 4) drbd1_fs 5) pgs

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-15 Thread Warren Young
On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Warren Young wrote: > [*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million terabytes, > which requires about 500 cubic meters of the densest HDDs available today. I’ve been wondering what 500 TB looks like, so I worked it out. It requires a mere 100 x 6