On 08/13/2014 12:37 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Package hwloc-1.5-2.el6_5.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>
fixed, signed rpms now posted. thanks for the heads up
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Package hwloc-1.5-2.el6_5.x86_64.rpm is not signed
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Great, thanks!
It looks like I will survive even if they drop "iptables-service" in some
future to come. Just for my understanding which of the following is
incorrect:
1. firewalld is a front end to the iptables kernel module (pretty much as
"iptables-service" is)
2. therefore the rules syntax is
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:59:17AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Wonderful!
>
> Can you do with firewalld an equivalent of the following done with iptables:
>
> :SSHSCAN - [0:0]
> -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -j SSHSCAN
> -A SSHSCAN -m recent --set --name SSH
> -A SSHSCAN -m
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 21:19 -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote:
> I have now been alerted by two list members to the behavior of the
> individual involved. I will not allow myself to be baited again.
I have blocked his normal and private email addresses on every incoming
MTA. Details available.
--
Reg
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 09:59 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Long ago I learned a rule
> (what users will expect from a good sysadmin): do not make any changes
> unless they are absolutely necessary.
The English (non-American) version is
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
So, to use in
Wonderful!
Can you do with firewalld an equivalent of the following done with iptables:
:SSHSCAN - [0:0]
-A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -j SSHSCAN
-A SSHSCAN -m recent --set --name SSH
-A SSHSCAN -m recent --update --seconds 300 --hitcount 10 --name SSH -j DROP
-A INPUT -p tcp --
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:26:17AM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>
> Jonathan:
>
> > Looking at the documentation closer, there does appear to be a way to
> > add rules to the OUTPUT table, using the rich rules syntax.
>
> Do you see a way to set the default policy to DROP?
Most likely, just addin
We are working on an update to docker within RHEL7. First we are
releasing it to our High Touch Beta process. If you are on HTB you
should see a release in the next week.
On 08/12/2014 08:54 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2014 07:02 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> Looks like docker-io
Jonathan:
> Looking at the documentation closer, there does appear to be a way to
> add rules to the OUTPUT table, using the rich rules syntax.
Do you see a way to set the default policy to DROP?
Thanks,
Neil
--
Neil Aggarwal, (972) 834-1565
We lend money to investors to buy or refinance sing
Am 2014-08-08 23:55, schrieb Neil Aggarwal:
> Hello all:
>
> I am looking at the documentation of the new firewalld service in
> CentOS 7.
> It looks like no matter what I configure with it, outgoing connections
> are
> still going to be allowed. That does not seem very secure.
>
> I always se
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 04:55:15PM -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> I am looking at the documentation of the new firewalld service in CentOS 7.
> It looks like no matter what I configure with it, outgoing connections are
> still going to be allowed. That does not seem very secure.
Looking at the doc
On 08/11/2014 07:02 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Looks like docker-io-1.0.0 is available in EPEL:
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/repoview/docker-io.html
This package is due to be removed from EPEL soon, because of EPEL's
policy of not competing/conflicting with base
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
Am 12.08.2014 um 00:09 schrieb David Beveridge:
> Another alternative to milters is the postfix policy daemons.
> The best one to use for block and reject is policyd-weight.
> found here http://www.policyd-weight.org/
>
> This gives spam a weight based on a number of factors.
> I setup to do this
Hello again,
here is my solution on how to use Postfix + Spamassassin on CentOS in 4
steps:
1) yum install spamassassin
2) useradd spam
3) Add the following line to /etc/postfix/header_checks:
/^Subject: \[SPAM\]/ DISCARD
4) Add the following lines to /etc/postfix/master.cf:
smtp ine
16 matches
Mail list logo
