CentOS Errata and BugFix Advisory 2014:C001
Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7364
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
a2b5ece4065075c7b11e9ce59d6281bebc9b9b98b3076160f388f3eb1e965fc2
On 8/21/2014 9:50 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-08-22, Valeri Galtsevgalt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
3ware was independent company till it was first bought by AMCC, then LSI
bought them from AMCC. I didn't know LSI sold them to someone else,
Sorry, I was not clear: LSI was bought, not
On 08/21/2014 10:03 AM, Bill Gee wrote:
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:00:03 centos-requ...@centos.org wrote:
Re: [CentOS] SELinux vs. logwatch and virsh
From: Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
On 08/18/2014 02:13 PM, Bill Gee wrote:
Hi Dan -
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Toralf Lund toralf.l...@pgs.com wrote:
What is formally correct about putting executables in some obscure
place under /var?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that. For the alternatives setup I
have links on /usr/bin or whatever pointing to other links on
On 2014-08-22, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
there's been a whole lot of merging and splitting.
You know more about this than is probably healthy. ;-)
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
/var for the java
executables?? /opt might have made sense.
Oops, I guess it is actually under /usr/lib/jvm which isn't quite as
bad, but still not the first place you'd expect for an executables
like java, javac,
Hi,
I didn't find system-config-lvm package on centos 7 official repo's, why?
:)
Greetings
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 8/22/2014 10:10 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I didn't find system-config-lvm package on centos 7 official repo's, why?
there isn't any such package any more. manage lvm with its basic
commands (vgcreate, vgs, vgextend, lvcreate, lvs, lvextend, etc).
--
john r pierce
What's the story with php-fpm on centos 6?
There's a php-fpm rpm for centos 6 in epel but other essential mods like
mod_fastcgi or mod_proxy_fcgi
seem to be missing from the repos I'm usually using. Need a push in
right direction.
Thanks.
___
CentOS
I don't rely on such a tool to manage lvms but I'm making a doc about
LVM's and it was interesting to have a graphical approach...
2014-08-22 14:55 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 22.08.2014 um 19:10 schrieb Sergio Belkin:
I didn't find system-config-lvm package on
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:17 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Yes, but try a software RAID when you have intermittently bad RAM.
I've been there. Mirrored disks that were almost, but not quite,
mirrors.
try any file system when you've got flakey ram.data thats not quite
what
On Fri, August 22, 2014 12:23 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/22/2014 10:10 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I didn't find system-config-lvm package on centos 7 official repo's, why?
there isn't any such package any more. manage lvm with its basic
commands (vgcreate, vgs, vgextend, lvcreate, lvs,
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:17 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
wrote:
Yes, but try a software RAID when you have intermittently bad RAM.
I've been there. Mirrored disks that were almost, but not quite,
mirrors.
try any file system when you've got flakey ram.data
Remi repo provides it?
22.8.2014 20.59 kirjoitti Александр Кириллов nevis...@infoline.su:
What's the story with php-fpm on centos 6?
There's a php-fpm rpm for centos 6 in epel but other essential mods like
mod_fastcgi or mod_proxy_fcgi
seem to be missing from the repos I'm usually using. Need
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:06:36PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, August 22, 2014 12:23 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/22/2014 10:10 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I didn't find system-config-lvm package on centos 7 official repo's, why?
there isn't any such package any more. manage
Does it? There's mod_fastcgi in rpmforge but I don't feel
quite comfortable with packages from this repo.
Eero Volotinen писал 2014-08-22 22:46:
Remi repo provides it?
22.8.2014 20.59 kirjoitti Александр Кириллов nevis...@infoline.su:
What's the story with php-fpm on centos 6?
There's a
Hi folks,
on CentOS 6.5 I run tripwire software which verifies data integrity. My
system is automatically updated by yum (as far as I understand the
/etc/cron.daily/0yum.cron is responsible for the regular system
updates). After a system update I'm then notified by tripwire about the
changes
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Meikel wrote:
By browsing those tripwire reports I found that there are files which
did not change at all (i.e. the MD5 hash is the same as before) but the
inode changed. I do not understand what yum did to the file that
resulted in an inode change,
Meikel,
Aside from the stupid way:
create a file org_name
copy it to new_name
rm org_name
mv new_name org_name
I don't know of a way to change inode
and keep md5 the same.
Does anyone know of a way?
This would be the perfect question for this forum.
GKH
Hi folks,
on CentOS 6.5 I run
So I noticed that the minimal installation of CentOS 7 comes - in
contrary to minimal CentOS 6.5 - preinstalled with the NetworkManager.
I somewhat understand its usefulness, especially for wlan / desktops,
and its not like it really bothers me.. That being said, it seems to me
with my naive
On 8/22/2014 2:55 PM, Christof Stocker wrote:
So I noticed that the minimal installation of CentOS 7 comes - in
contrary to minimal CentOS 6.5 - preinstalled with the NetworkManager.
I somewhat understand its usefulness, especially for wlan / desktops,
and its not like it really bothers me..
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:58:29PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/22/2014 2:55 PM, Christof Stocker wrote:
So I noticed that the minimal installation of CentOS 7 comes - in
contrary to minimal CentOS 6.5 - preinstalled with the NetworkManager.
I somewhat understand its usefulness,
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:58:29PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/22/2014 2:55 PM, Christof Stocker wrote:
So I noticed that the minimal installation of CentOS 7 comes - in
contrary to minimal CentOS 6.5 - preinstalled with the NetworkManager.
I somewhat
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 06:13:56PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
And most of us *still* don't like it
And luckily there is a solution. Don't use CentOS-7.
John
--
The price we pay for money is paid in liberty.
-- Robert Louis Stevenson
On 22/08/14 06:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 02:58:29PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/22/2014 2:55 PM, Christof Stocker wrote:
So I noticed that the minimal installation of CentOS 7 comes - in
contrary to minimal CentOS 6.5 - preinstalled
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
More important with regards to the minimal install set it matches what
Red Hat is doing.
And most of us *still* don't like it
mark
Time is ticking on... The longer you avoid learning what is coming, the
further
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:24:06PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Except that wasting time re-learning a new and strange way to do
something that already worked - or how to disable the new thing so it
doesn't break your working setup - doesn't really put you ahead of
anything.
This is a _major_
On 08/23/2014 12:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Except that wasting time re-learning a new and strange way to do
something that already worked - or how to disable the new thing so it
doesn't break your working setup - doesn't really put you ahead of
anything.
I totally agree, Les, I think RH and
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:33 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:24:06PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Except that wasting time re-learning a new and strange way to do
something that already worked - or how to disable the new thing so it
doesn't break your
On 8/22/2014 3:39 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's not so much 'The' Red Hat way of doing things - although SysV
mostly had it right in the first place. But the annoying part is the
number of Red Hat Ways' that are just arbitrarily different - like a
car company swapping the brake and gas pedal
On 22/08/14 06:39 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:33 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:24:06PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Except that wasting time re-learning a new and strange way to do
something that already worked - or how to disable
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
To continue your analogy, should car companies have stopped changing
after the 20s? I mean, the cars then got you were you needed to go, right?
The point is to abstract an interface so you can make changes behind
it without
On 22/08/14 07:07 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
To continue your analogy, should car companies have stopped changing
after the 20s? I mean, the cars then got you were you needed to go, right?
The point is to abstract an interface so
On 2014-08-22, GKH x...@darksmile.net wrote:
Aside from the stupid way:
create a file org_name
copy it to new_name
rm org_name
mv new_name org_name
I don't know of a way to change inode
and keep md5 the same.
If the bug that Matthew cited is involved, then that's likely very much
what
On 2014-08-22, Bernard Lheureux bernard.lheur...@bbsoft4.org wrote:
I totally agree, Les, I think RH and CentOS are really going the wrong
way since the release of that ugly version 7 !!!
You can always start a NoNetworkManager SIG.
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
What are the significant changes in Centos 6.6 (as released so far)?
Ted Miller
Elkhart, IN, USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:21:48AM -0400, Ted Miller wrote:
What are the significant changes in Centos 6.6 (as released so far)?
There is no CentOS 6.6 release yet :) The upstream beta was released
a couple weeks back but it is a closed beta available to current RHEL6
clients and partners only.
On 08/22/2014 11:27 PM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
Does it? There's mod_fastcgi in rpmforge but I don't feel
quite comfortable with packages from this repo.
Just check the spec file from the src.rpm and see if you find something
suspicious. Or, if you have a bit more spare time, check the spec
38 matches
Mail list logo
