Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]

2014-09-04 Thread m . roth
Tom Bishop wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:30 PM, wrote: >> >>Here's the answer: making a software RAID on a bare drive with no GPT >> works fine. If it has a GPT, and no partition, it fails on reboot, even >> with an /etc/mdadm.conf. >> >>I've proved this: >>first, I created th

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]

2014-09-04 Thread Tom Bishop
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:30 PM, wrote: > Ok, folks, > >Here's the answer: making a software RAID on a bare drive with no GPT > works fine. If it has a GPT, and no partition, it fails on reboot, even > with an /etc/mdadm.conf. > >I've proved this: >first, I created the array on the

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]

2014-09-04 Thread m . roth
Ok, folks, Here's the answer: making a software RAID on a bare drive with no GPT works fine. If it has a GPT, and no partition, it fails on reboot, even with an /etc/mdadm.conf. I've proved this: first, I created the array on the bare drive, rebooted, and /dev/md0 was there; t

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue

2014-09-04 Thread Lamar Owen
On 09/04/2014 01:35 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: .. (The 1.2 superblock goes 4K in from the first sector; prior to 1.1 the superblock went to the last sector of the drive). Does that mean autodetection/assembly would be possible with 1.2 but not 1.1

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue

2014-09-04 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > >> > Of course; but in the context of an MD RAID device with member devices as > raw disks I would not expect a partition table of any kind, GPT or > otherwise. Whether it can be there or not is not my point; it's whether > it's expected or not.

[CentOS] Dojo at Fossetcon (Orlando, FL) 11 Sep.

2014-09-04 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If any of you are attending Fossetcon next week in Orlando, FL, please join us for a CentOS Dojo on Thursday 11 Sep. http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Orlando2014 * Garrett Honeycutt - Why Automation is Important * Dmitri Pal - Active Directory Inte

Re: [CentOS] Kernel errors after updating

2014-09-04 Thread Rodrigo B Brasil
Here I have the same error, but we're using VMware. I tried to change de type os SCSI controller on VMware and the CentOS loaded other module too, but the VMs continues to displays this timeout erros on dmesg. The machine just do not respond to anything, and 3~5min after, it turns back to life. I

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue

2014-09-04 Thread Lamar Owen
On 09/02/2014 07:36 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Wait just a minute. How can you use the raw device but still have a GPT on it? That doesn't seem right, to have a GUID Partition Table but no partitions. Have you never deleted all the partitions on a disk under any scheme before? Of course; bu

[CentOS] Kernel errors after updating

2014-09-04 Thread C. L. Martinez
Hi all, I have updated my Centos 6.5 KVM host to kernel 2.6.32-431.23.3 this morning ... After 2 hours working, the following kernel error appears and all vm guests goes slowly device monif4 entered promiscuous mode monif: port 5(monif4) entering forwarding state INFO: task cgroup:83 blocke

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 4

2014-09-04 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ..

[CentOS] default MPM

2014-09-04 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi folks What is the default MPM in apache on CentOS 7? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos