On 9/7/2014 8:09 PM, Digimer wrote:
I'm not so familiar with software RAID, but I would be surprised if
there isn't a way to force write-through caching. If this is possible,
then Valeri's concern can be addressed (at the cost of performance).
software raid on enterprise grade JBOD *is* write-
On Sun, September 7, 2014 9:55 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> Indeed, lucky me. As of this moment I have 6 of 9650 in production
>> boxes.
>> For at least 6 years. During which time none of them ever failed on me
>> (including any trouble with arrays). Knocki
On 07/09/14 11:01 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-09-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Even more: system failure or power loss is more likely to destroy all data
on software RAID than on a single drive when there is a lot of IO present
(to the best of my understanding, loss of cache software RAID is u
On 07/09/14 10:43 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, September 7, 2014 9:30 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/7/2014 7:19 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I want to set up a new CentOS install using version 7 and would like
to experiment with various RAID levels. Anyone care to point out a
tutorial?
how m
On 2014-09-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Even more: system failure or power loss is more likely to destroy all data
> on software RAID than on a single drive when there is a lot of IO present
> (to the best of my understanding, loss of cache software RAID is using is
> more catastrophic compared t
On 2014-09-08, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> Indeed, lucky me. As of this moment I have 6 of 9650 in production boxes.
> For at least 6 years. During which time none of them ever failed on me
> (including any trouble with arrays). Knocking on wood.
You totally jinxed them! You'll probably have three
On Sun, September 7, 2014 9:30 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/7/2014 7:19 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
>> I want to set up a new CentOS install using version 7 and would like
>> to experiment with various RAID levels. Anyone care to point out a
>> tutorial?
>
> how many drives do you have for this exp
On 9/7/2014 7:19 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I want to set up a new CentOS install using version 7 and would like
to experiment with various RAID levels. Anyone care to point out a
tutorial?
how many drives do you have for this experiment? whats the target
usecase for the file systems on the rai
On Sun, September 7, 2014 8:55 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> I guess after that I should declare myself to be lucky. None out of more
>> than a couple of dozens of 3ware cards ever did harm for me. I did once
>> had one of them fried (my clumsiness most like
I want to set up a new CentOS install using version 7 and would like
to experiment with various RAID levels. Anyone care to point out a
tutorial?
TIA
Dave
--
We hang petty thieves and appoint great ones to office
-- Aesop
___
CentOS mailing
On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad wrote:
>
> I don't see a reason, why I should have a zoo of distros. A productive
> basic installation of CentOS 7 needs ~ 100 MB RAM. Why the installation
> needs more than 5 times that is really interesting question.
Are you volunteering to organize a SIG around low-
On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> I guess after that I should declare myself to be lucky. None out of more
> than a couple of dozens of 3ware cards ever did harm for me. I did once
> had one of them fried (my clumsiness most likely), which then just didn't
> come up (3ware just replaced car
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/14 16:06, Oliver Schad wrote:
> Ok, final result: deleting the initramfs files results in a clean
> installation. So we waste ~300 MB RAM during installation with a
> file nobody needs. Great.
>
> Best Regards Oli
>
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:
How much memory does it take to run and install from a live CD?
What about a clone of a partition that has CentOS installed?
--
Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical
reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young
goat to your SCSI chain
On Sep 7, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM, only the installer is
> br0ken. Is it a java installer? *g*
The installer (anaconda) is written in python. The memory limit is hard-coded
into the installer, not based on how much memory the installer
On Sun, September 7, 2014 5:44 pm, mn 320 wrote:
> Is Centos team going to publish a correct version of php-mcrypt via yum?
> Centos 6.5 and now 7 is out but no php-mcrypt. php-mcrypt is used by lots
> of applications. and the one from EPEL repository is buggy and sometimes
> makes my server crash
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 14:00 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Somehow it comes to my mind what someone called M$ Windows somewhere
> around Windows XP: "bloated pig" ;-)
Starting with Windoze 95, it has been "bloatware".
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/7/2014 3:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> Well they did have the opportunity to make changes in the minimal iso
>> since that doesn't directly correspond to a RHEL version. I haven't
>> used it yet because I already had the dvd download
6.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:53 AM, mn 320 wrote:
> It is not the server crashing. Apache stops responding and I could not
> find anything in the logs.
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:47 AM, John R. Dennison
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:44:44AM +0200, mn 320 wrote:
>> > Is Centos tea
It is not the server crashing. Apache stops responding and I could not
find anything in the logs.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:47 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:44:44AM +0200, mn 320 wrote:
> > Is Centos team going to publish a correct version of php-mcrypt via yum?
> > C
On 9/7/2014 3:44 PM, mn 320 wrote:
Is Centos team going to publish a correct version of php-mcrypt via yum?
Centos 6.5 and now 7 is out but no php-mcrypt.
is this package part of RHEL 6 or 7 ?
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left
On 9/7/2014 3:40 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Well they did have the opportunity to make changes in the minimal iso
since that doesn't directly correspond to a RHEL version. I haven't
used it yet because I already had the dvd downloaded, but if you have
reasonable internet bandwidth, I think a minim
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 12:44:44AM +0200, mn 320 wrote:
> Is Centos team going to publish a correct version of php-mcrypt via yum?
> Centos 6.5 and now 7 is out but no php-mcrypt. php-mcrypt is used by lots
> of applications. and the one from EPEL repository is buggy and sometimes
> makes my server
Is Centos team going to publish a correct version of php-mcrypt via yum?
Centos 6.5 and now 7 is out but no php-mcrypt. php-mcrypt is used by lots
of applications. and the one from EPEL repository is buggy and sometimes
makes my server crash.
___
CentOS m
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the CentOS
> packagers, you might wish to vent at the Upstream...because, when all is
> said and done, CentOS is a repackaged RHEL. Whatever the requirements are
> for the upstr
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/7/2014 11:56 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> >On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> >And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
>>> >
>>> >https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB m
On Sun, September 7, 2014 2:04 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> On 2014-09-07 2:56 pm, Oliver Schad wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
>>> > And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
>>>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/art
Ok, final result: deleting the initramfs files results in a clean
installation. So we waste ~300 MB RAM during installation with a file
nobody needs. Great.
Best Regards
Oli
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:45:40 +0200
Oliver Schad wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:19:01 +0200
> Oliver Schad wrote:
>
> > t
On 09/07/2014 10:22 PM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
This is an ipv6-enabled system and that's probably why yum tries to get
an ipv6 address first for mirror.centos.org and fails miserably. For
whatever reason I do not get an authoritative negative response for
query from upstream servers. Wel
On 9/7/2014 11:56 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
>On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> >And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
>
>https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
>x86_64.
It doesn't matter what
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:19:01 +0200
Oliver Schad wrote:
> tmpfs: /run/, 311 MB used
That is really funny: inside of this ramdisk is a tmp dir, with 279 MB
inside, where the biggest part is the squashfs image and some files
which are generated after start of installation.
├── curl_fetch_url0
├── c
Александр Кириллов писал 2014-09-06 18:32:
There seems to be a problem with my local dns server resolving
mirror.centos.org.
I know something about dns but obviously not enough to figure out
what
might be wrong here or how to fix
this in bind configs. The SERVFAIL errors below seem to be relate
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 15:04:12 -0400
Mike Burger wrote:
> Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the
> CentOS packagers
My first statement was a simple "FYI" so that you know this requirement
during installation.
I found one problem with the initramfs file which has 30
On 2014-09-07 2:56 pm, Oliver Schad wrote:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
x86_64.
It doesn't matter what it sa
On Sun, September 7, 2014 1:08 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad wrote:
>>
>> With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
>> more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...
Interestingly: I just looked up FreeBSD 64 bit (amd64 they cal
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> > And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
>
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
> x86_64.
It doesn't matter what it says. What matters is to think about
re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/2014 01:31 PM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:08:18 -0700
> Keith Keller wrote:
>
>> On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad wrote:
>>>
>>> With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
>>> more than 512 MB RAM on a te
On Sun, September 7, 2014 1:04 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't sound like you are flashing all 3ware cards you have in
>> production every time new firmware release it out. It doesn't sound
>> either
>> like you had fatal failure of production box b
On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for x86_64.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:38:36 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/7/2014 11:31 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
> > No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ...
> > doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough.
>
> a $50 beaglebone black has 512MB ram, and is best run with ucLin
On 9/7/2014 11:31 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ...
doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough.
a $50 beaglebone black has 512MB ram, and is best run with ucLinux and
busybox.
That is not the target market of RHEL7 and therefo
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:08:18 -0700
Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad wrote:
> >
> > With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
> > more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...
>
> Could switch to a different console and bounce on top,
On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad wrote:
>
> With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
> more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...
Could switch to a different console and bounce on top, if you're
interested.
512MB seems really small these days, so I'm g
On 2014-09-07, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> It doesn't sound like you are flashing all 3ware cards you have in
> production every time new firmware release it out. It doesn't sound either
> like you had fatal failure of production box because of bug in 3ware
> firmware. Correct me if I'm wrong, other
Just FYI:
I had several problems to install CentOS 7 with 512 MB RAM. No log
showed me that problem (I would expect a system check before).
With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...
Best Regards
Oli
sign
On 7 Sep 2014 13:01, "Frantisek Hanzlik" wrote:
>
> Are somewhere for these distribution available (unofficial) Samba4
> RPMs packages with Heimdal Kerberos?
>
http://www.enterprisesamba.com
We use these at my workplace.
As for the MIT bit according to the samba technical list if it doesn't lan
On 09/07/2014 03:24 AM, dE wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I installed CentOS 7 today, it's a minimal install, so it didn't have
> ifconfig command. So I installed net-tools, however I can't add ipv6
> address to it.
The cool kids are all using 'ip' these days since ifconfig is deprecated.
>
> # ifconfig en
On Sun, September 7, 2014 1:35 am, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2014-09-06, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> ... I've mentined manufacturers in another reply: tyan, lsi, 3ware,
>> ati...
>
> Even 3ware has had buggy firmwares. I once had to flash a 3ware card
> years into production because it was not un
Aly Khimji wrote:
> It would appear the samba4 DC isn't available for C7 just yet.
>
> "As Fedora and RHEL are using MIT Kerberos implementation as its Kerberos
> infrastructure of choice, the Samba Active Directory Domain Controller
> implementation is not available with MIT Kereberos at the mome
2014-09-07 11:24 GMT+03:00 dE :
> Hi!
>
> I installed CentOS 7 today, it's a minimal install, so it didn't have
> ifconfig command. So I installed net-tools, however I can't add ipv6
> address to it.
>
> # ifconfig enp0s3 add fc00::1002/124
> SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied.´
>
try disabling ipv6
Hi!
I installed CentOS 7 today, it's a minimal install, so it didn't have
ifconfig command. So I installed net-tools, however I can't add ipv6
address to it.
# ifconfig enp0s3 add fc00::1002/124
SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied.
Yes, I'm running as root.
CentOS is running in a Qemu instance w
51 matches
Mail list logo
